Bone tissue reacts in different ways to implant surfaces with different patterns. The aim of this study is to understand which laser generated surface pattern produces the best cell adhesion in vitro, evaluating both the activity of the alkaline phosphatase and the cells adhering to titanium samples. Tests were carried out on titanium samples with sandblasted surfaces with laser-produced holes with diameters of 5, 10, and 20 μm, and on sandblasted titanium cylinders without holes as controls. The samples were inserted into culture medium containing SaOS-2 cells for 3, 7 and 10 days. The results showed that at days 3 and 7 the laser surfaces stimulated a higher production of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) compared to the data from the control group. At day 10 there were no significant differences between the test group and the control group.
BowersKTKellerJCRandolphBRMichaelsCMWickDG. Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants1992; 7:302–310.
2.
Groessner-SchreiberBTuanRS. Enhanced extracellular matrix production and mineralization by osteoblast cultured on titanium surfaces in vitro. J Cell Sci1992; 101:209–217.
3.
WennerbergAAlbrektssonTAnderssonBKrollJJ. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Impl Res1995; 6:24–30.
4.
WennerbergAAlbrektssonTAnderssonB. Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminium oxide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants1996; 11:38–45.
5.
WennerbergAAlbrektssonTJohanssonCAnderssonB. Experimental study of turned and gritblasted implants with special emphasis on effect of blasting material surface topography. Biomaterials1996; 17:15–22.
6.
WennerbergAEktessabiAAlbrektssonTJohanssonCAnderssonB. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants1997; 12:486–494.
7.
WennebergA. Patent WO 01/35871 A1.
8.
AlbrektssonTBranemarkP-IHanssonH-ALindstromJ. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirement for ensuring a long-lasting direct bone anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand1981; 52:155–170.
9.
ParkJBBronzinoJDKimYK. Metallic Biomaterials, Ceramic Biomaterials, In: Biomaterials Principles and Application: ParkJ.B.BronzinoJ.D. (eds), pp 1–45, CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, 2003.
10.
TanJSaltzmanWM. Biomaterials with hierarchically defined micro- and nanoscale structure. Biornaterials2004; 25:3593–3601.
11.
JiBGaoH. Mechanical properties of nanostructure of biological materials. J. Mech Phy Solids2004; 52:1963–1990.
12.
DanN. Synthesis of hierarchical materials. Trends Biotechnol2000; 18:370–374.
13.
MannS. Biomaterializations and biomimetic materials chemistry. J Mater Chem1995; 5:935–946.
14.
RobinsonR. The possible significance of hexosephosphoric ester in ossification. Biochem J1923; 17:286–293.
15.
MiaoDScuttA. Histochemical localization of alkaline phosphatase activity in decalcified bone and cartilage. J Histochem Cytochem2002; 50:333–340.
16.
HenthornPMillanJLLeboyP. Principles of bone biology, 1999 eds. SeibelMJRobinsSPBilezikianJP. Academic, San Diego, pp. 127–136.
17.
HarrisH. The Human alkaline phosphatases: What we know and what we don't know. Clin Chim Acta1989; 186:133–200.
18.
PuleoDANanciA. Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface. Biomaterials1999; 20:2311–21.
19.
WielandMTextorMChehroudiBBrunetteDM. Synergistic interaction of topographic features in the production of bone-like nodules on Ti surfaces by rat osteoblasts. Biomaterials2005; 26(10):1119–30.
20.
CochranDLSchenkRKLussiAHigginbottomFLBuserD. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res1998; 40:1–11.
21.
CloverJGowenM. Are MG-63 and HOS TE 85 Human osteosarcoma cell lines representative models of the osteoblastic phenotype?Bone1994; 15:585–91.
22.
BoyanBDSchwartzZLohmannCHSylviaVLCochranDLDeanDD. Pretreatment of bone with osteoclasts affects phenotypic expression of osteoblast-like cells. J Orthop Res2003; 21(4):638–47.
23.
ZingerOZhaoGSchwartzZSimpsonJWielandMLandoltD. Differential regulation of osteoblasts by substrate microstructural features. Biomaterials2005; 26:1837–47.
24.
OwenTAHolthuisJMarkoseEvan WijnenAJWolfeSAGrimesSR. Modification of proteinDNA interactions in the proximal promoter of a cell-growth-regulated histone gene during onset and progression of osteoblast differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA1990; 87:5129–33.
25.
GeckelerKWackerRMartiniFHackAAicherW. Enhanced biocompatibility for SAOS-2 osteosarcoma cells by surface coating with hydrofilic epoxy resins. Cell Physiol Biochem2003; 13:155–64.
26.
MuhonenVHeikkinenRDanilovAJamsaTIlvesaroJTuukkanenJ. The phase state of NiTi implant material affects osteoclastic attachment. J Biomed Mater Res2005; 75:681–8.
