This paper considers Western approaches at different time periods to Chinese landscape painting, with a focus on the eleventh century Chinese painter Guo Xi’s Essay on landscape painting. First, brief information will be given about the artist and his work. A brief scrutiny of a review published in 1936 will show how the Essay became influential in the West. Later publications, which appeared in 1969, 2007, and 2009 respectively, will show some changes in Western approaches to Chinese landscape painting, revealing the main rhetoric of their times along with changing debates and approaches within Western art history.
BlairSBloomJ (2003) The mirage of Islamic art: Reflections on the study of an unwieldy field. The Art Bulletin85(1): 152–184.
2.
BozdoğanSNecipoğluG (2007) Entangled discourses: scrutinizing orientalist and Nationalist legacies in the architectural historiography of the “Lands of Rum”‘, Muqarnas. An Annual on the Visual Cultures of the Islamic World24: 1–6.
3.
ClunasC (1997) Art in China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
De SilvaA (1967) The Art of Chinese Landscape Painting in the Caves of Tunhuang. New York: Crown Publishers.
5.
FeleppaR (1986) Emics, Etics, and social objectivity. Current Anthropology27(3): 243–255.
6.
FernaldHE (1936) Review of An Essay on Landscape Painting by Kuo his. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland68(4): 681–683.
7.
FongWC (1969) Toward a structural analysis of Chinese landscape painting. Art Journal28(4): 388–397.
8.
GombrichEH (1960) Art and Illusion: A study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. New York: Pantheon Books.
9.
GrabarO (1976) Islamic art and archaeology. In BinderL (ed), The Study of the Middle EastNew York: Wiley, 229–263.
10.
GuoX (1935) An Essay on Landscape Painting, transl. SakanishiShio. London: John Murray.
11.
HarrisM (1976) History and significance of the Emic/Etic distinction. Annual Review of Anthropology5: 329–350.
12.
KesnerL (2007) Is a Truly global art history possible?. In ElkinsJ (ed) Is Art History Global?. New York-London: Routledge, 81–111.
13.
LinC (2006) The Art of Chinese Painting: Capturing the Timeless Spirit of Nature, transl. YanX.NiY.Beijing: China Intercontinental Press.
14.
LinY (1967) The Chinese Theory of Art. Translations from the Masters of Chinese Art. London: Heinemann.
15.
MorrisMWLeungKAmesDLickelB (1999) Views from Inside and Outside: integrating Emic and Etic Insights about Culture and Justice Judgment. The Academy of Management Review24(4): 781–796.
16.
NelsonRS (1997) The map of art history. The Art Bulletin79(1): 28–40.
17.
PikeKL (1967) Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior. The Hague: Mouton.
18.
SullivanM (2007) The gift of distance: Chinese landscape painting as a source of inspiration. Southwest Review92(3): 407–419.
19.
SullivanM (1979) Symbols of Eternity: The Art of Landscape Painting in China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
20.
SummersD (1996) Representation. In NelsonRSShiffR (eds) Critical Terms for Art History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 3–16.
21.
SummersD (2006) World art history and the rise of Western modernism, or goodbye to the visual arts. In OniansJ (ed) Compression vs Expression: Containing and Explaining the World’s Art. New Haven: Yale University Press, 215–234.
22.
TinsleyCH (2005) The heart of darkness: advice on navigating cross-cultural research. International Negotiation10: 183–192.
23.
TurnerM (2009) Classical Chinese landscape painting and the aesthetic appreciation of nature. The Journal of Aesthetic Education43(1): 106–121.
24.
XiaJ (2011) An anthropological Emic-Etic perspective on open access practices. Journal of Documentation67(1): 75–94.
25.
ZhangA (2002) A History of Chinese Painting, trans. LiD. J.Beijing: Foreign Languages Press.