AndhyarujinaTR (1992) Judicial Activism and Constitutional Democracy in India. Bombay: N. M. Tripathi.
2.
BaxiU (1985) Taking suffering seriously: social action litigation in the Supreme Court of India. Third World Legal Studies4: 107–132.
3.
BaxiU (2007) The rule of law in India. IJHR4: 6–25.
4.
BhagwatiPN (1985) Judicial activism and public interest litigation. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law23: 561–577.
5.
BhagwatiPN (1988) Inaugural address by the Convenor. In Developing Human Rights Jurisprudence. The domestic application of international human rights norms. Commonwealth Secretariat: xx–xxiv.
6.
CunninghamC (1987) Public interest litigation in the Indian Supreme Court: a study in light of the American experience. Journal of the Indian Law Institute29: 494–523.
7.
DesaiAMuralidharS (2000) Public interest litigation: potential and problems. In KirpalBN. (eds) Supreme but not Infallible. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp.159–192.
8.
MateM (2010) Two paths to judicial power: the basic structure doctrine and public interest litigation in comparative perspective. San Diego International Law Journal12(1): 175–222.
9.
MehtaPB (2007) The rise of judicial sovereignty. J. Democracy18(2): 70–83.
10.
RobinsonN (2009) Expanding judiciaries: India and the rise of the good governance court. Wash. U. Global Stud. Law Review8(1): 1–69.
11.
TamanahaBZ (1995) Review: The lessons of law and development studies. American Journal of International Law89(2): 470–486.
12.
TrubekDGalanterM (1974) Scholars in self estrangement: some reflections on the crisis in law and development studies in the United States. Wisconsin Law Review: 1062–1102.
13.
UngerRM (1976) Law in Modern Society: Toward a Criticism of Social Theory. New York: Free Press.