AndersonMR (1990) Classifications and coercions: themes in South Asian legal studies in the 1980s. South Asia Research10(2): 158–177.
2.
BaxiU (2003) The colonialist heritage. In MundayPLMundayR (eds), Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.46–75.
3.
BertiD (2010) Hostile witnesses, judicial interactions and out-of-court narratives in a North Indian district court. Contributions to Indian Sociology44(3): 235–263.
4.
BertiD (2011a) Trials, witnesses and local stakes in a district court of Himachal Pradesh (North India). In PfaffJToffinG (eds) Citizenship, Democracy, and Belonging in the Himalayas,. New Delhi: Sage, pp.290–313.
5.
BertiD (2011b) Courts of law and legal practice. In Clark-DecesI (ed) A Companion to the Anthropology of India. Oxford: Blackwell, pp.355–370.
6.
BrownM (2003) Ethnology and colonial administration in nineteenth-century British India: the question of native crime and criminality. British Journal for the History of Science36(2): 201–219.
7.
CohnBS (1959) Some notes on law and change in North India. Economic Development and Cultural Change8(1): 79–93.
8.
CohnBS (1965) Anthropological notes on disputes and law in India. American Anthropologist, 67(6) The Ethnography of Law: 82–122.
9.
DaviesMCroallHTyrerJ (1995) Criminal Justice: An Introduction to the Criminal Justice System in England and Wales. London: Longman.
10.
EckertJ (2006) From subjects to citizens: legalism from below and the homogenisation of the legal sphere. Journal of Legal Pluralism53–54: 45–75.
11.
GalanterML (1992) The aborted restoration of ‘indigenous’ law in India. In Galanter ML, Law and Society in Modern India (introduction by R Dhavan). Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp.37–53.
12.
GuhaR (1989) Dominance without hegemony and its historiography. Subaltern Studiesvi: Writings on South Asian History and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.210–309.
13.
HaydenR (1984) A note on caste panchâyats and government courts in India: different kinds of stages for different kinds of performances. Journal of Legal Pluralism22: 43–52.
14.
KolskyE (2005) Codification and the rule of colonial difference: criminal procedure in British India. Law and History Review23(3): 631–683.
15.
LewisHS (1993) A new look at actor-oriented theory. PoLAR (Political and Legal Anthropology Review)16(3): 49–56.
16.
LuddenD (ed) (2001) Reading Subaltern Studies: Critical History, Contested Meaning, and the Globalisation of South Asia. New Delhi: Permanent Black.
17.
MerrySE (2003) Rights talk and the experience of law: implementing women’s human rights to protection from violence. Human Rights Quarterly25(2): 343–381.
18.
MooreEP (1993) Gender, power, and legal pluralism: Rajasthan, India. American Ethnologist20(3): 522–542.
19.
MooreH (1994) The problem of explaining violence in the social sciences. In HarveyPGowP (eds) Sex and Violence: Issues in Representation and Experience. London: Routledge, pp.522–542.
20.
RaoN (2007) Custom and the courts: ensuring women’s rights to land, Jharkhand, India. Development and Change38(2): 299–319.
21.
RousselG (2005) Les procès-verbaux d’interrogatoire : Rédaction et exploitation. Paris: L’Harmattan.
22.
ShahAM (1998) The Family in India: Critical Essays. New Delhi: Orient Longman.
23.
SivaramakrishnanK (2008) Some intellectual genealogies for the concept of everyday resistance. American Anthropologist107(3): 346–355.
24.
SrinivasMN (1962) Caste in Modern India, and Other Essays. Mumbai: Asia Publishing House.
25.
SteinB (1980) Peasant, State and Society in Medieval India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
26.
WardhaughJ (2005) The jungle and the village: discourses on crime and deviance in rural North India. South Asia Research25(2): 129–140.