AndersonMR (1990) Classifications and coercions: themes in South Asian legal studies in the 1980s. South Asian Res., 10: 158–177.
2.
BentonL (2002) Law and Colonial Cultures. Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BourdieuP (1987) The force of Law: toward a sociology of the juridical field. (transl. by R. Terdiman). The Hastings Law Journal38: 805–853.
4.
CohnBS (1959) Some notes on law and change in North India. Economic Development and Cultural Change8(1): 79–93.
5.
ComaroffJLRobertsS (1981) Rules and Processes. The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
CommailleJDumoulinLRobertC, eds (2010) La Juridicisation du politique. Paris: LGDJ.
7.
CommailleJKaluszynskiM, eds (2007) La Fonction politique de la justice. Paris: La Découverte.
8.
GalanterML (1992) The aborted restoration of ‘indigenous’ law in India, In GalanterML, Law and Society in Modern India (introduction by R Dhavan). Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp.37–53.
9.
KaluszynskiM (2007) La fonction politique de la justice: regards historiques. Du souci d’historicité à la pertinence de l’historicisation. In CommailleJKaluszynskiM (eds) La Fonction politique de la justice. Paris: La Découverte, pp.9–23.
10.
Lazarus-BlackMHirschSF, eds (2010) Contested States. Law, Hegemony and Resistance. New York/London: Routledge.
11.
MerrySE (2003) Rights talk and the experience of law: implementing women’s human rights to protection from violence. Human Rights Quarterly25(2): 343–381.
12.
MertzEEGoodaleM (2012) Comparative anthropology of law. In ClarkD (ed) Comparative Law and Society Elgar Series: Research Handbooks in Comparative Law. Northampton, MA: E Elgar, pp.77–91; http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1988908.
13.
MooreEP (1993) Gender, power, and legal pluralism: Rajasthan, India. American Ethnologist20(3): 522–542.
14.
MooreH (1994) The problem of explaining violence in the social sciences. In HarveyPGowP (eds) Sex and Violence: Issues in Representation and Experience. London: Routledge, pp.522–542.
15.
MooreSF (1973) Law and social change: the semi-autonomous social field as an appropriate subject of study. Law & Society Review7: 719–746.
16.
MukhopadhyayA (2006) Behind the Mask. The Cultural Definition of the Legal Subject in Colonial Bengal (1715–1911). Delhi: Oxford University Press.
17.
RanderiaS (2007) The state of globalization: legal plurality, overlapping sovereignties and ambiguous alliances between civil society and the cunning state in India. Theory, Culture and Society24(1): 1–33.
18.
SinghaR (1998) A Despotism of Law: Crime and Justice in Early Colonial India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
19.
WadiaSPN (1897) The Institution of Trial by Jury in India. Bombay: Fort Printing Press.