AspectADalibardJRogerG (1982) ‘Experimental Test of Bell’s Inequalities Using Time-Varying Analyzers’, Phys. Rev. Lett., 49: 1804–1807.
4.
BitbolM (1997) Mécanique quantique, une introduction philosophique. Paris: Flammarion.
5.
BitbolM (1998) ‘Some Steps Towards a Transcendental Deduction of Quantum Mechanics’, Philosophia naturalis, 35: 253–280.
6.
BohmDHileyB J (1993) The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory. London: Routledge.
7.
BohrN (1961) Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. New York: Science Editions Inc.
8.
BooleG (1952) ‘On The Theory of Probabilities’, in id., Studies in Logic and Probability. London: Watts.
9.
BooleG (1958) An Investigation of the Laws of Thought. New York: Dover Publications.
10.
BornM (1983) ‘On the Quantum Mechanics of Collisions’, in WheelerJ AZurekW H (eds), Quantum Theory and Measurement, pp. 52–55. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
BrittanG G (1994) ‘Kant and the Quantum Theory’, in ParriniP (ed.) Kant and Contemporary Epistemology, pp. 131–155. Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer.
13.
CassirerE (1956) Determinism and Indeterminism in Modern Physics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
14.
ChiaoR YGarrisonJ (1999) ‘Réalité ou localité: laquelle faut-il abandonner?’ (unpublished paper from a conference at the UIP, Paris).
15.
ChiaoR YKwiatP GSteinbergA M (1995) ‘Quantum Non-Locality in 2-Photons Experiments at Berkeley’, Quantum and Semi-Classical Optics, 7: 259–278.
16.
Destouches-FévrierP (1951) La structure des théories physiques. Paris: PUF.
17.
DicksonM (1995) ‘An Empirical Reply to Empiricism: Protective Measurement Opens the Door for Quantum Realism’, Philosophy of Science, 62: 122–140.
18.
EinsteinA (1971) ‘Quantum Mechanics and Reality’, in EinsteinABornM, The Born-Einstein Letters. London: Macmillan.
19.
d’EspagnatB (1975) ‘Use of Inequalities for the Experimental Test of a General Conception of the Foundation of Microphysics i’, Phys. Rev. D 11: 1424–1435.
20.
d’EspagnatB (1978) ‘Use of Inequalities for the Experimental Test of a General Conception of the Foundation of Microphysics ii’, Phys. Rev. D 18: 349–378.
21.
d’EspagnatB (1979) À la recherche du réel. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.
22.
d’EspagnatB (1984) ‘Non-Separability and the Tentative Descriptions of Reality’, Physics Reports, 110: 201–264.
23.
d’EspagnatB (1990) ‘Towards a separable empirical reality’, Foundations of Physics, 20: 1147–1172.
24.
FévrierP (1956) L’interprétation physique de la mécanique ondulatoire. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.
25.
Gell-MannM (1995) The Quark and Jaguar. Adventures in the Simple and the Complex. New York: St Martin’s Press.
26.
HarocheSBruneMRaimondJ M (1997) ‘Reversible Decoherence of a Mesoscopic Superposition of Field States’, Phys. Rev. Lett., 79: 1964–1967.
27.
HarocheSRaimondJ MBruneM (1997) ‘Le chat de Schrödinger se prête à l’expérience’, La Recherche, 301, septembre.
28.
HeelanP (1970) ‘Complementarity, Context-Dependence, and Quantum Logic’, Foundations of Physics, 1(2): 95–110.
29.
HeisenbergW (1930) The Physical Principles of Quantum Theory. New York: Dover Publications Inc.
30.
HeisenbergW (1983) ‘The Physical Content of Quantum Kinematics and Mechanics’, in WheelerJ AZurekW H (eds), Quantum Theory and Measurement, pp. 62–84. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.
31.
HeisenbergW (2002) Der Teil und das Ganze. Munich: Piper.
32.
HermannG (1996) Les fondements philosophiques de la mécanique quantique, prés. par SolerL. Paris: Vrin.
33.
HughesR I G (1989) The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP.
34.
JammerM (1974) The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. New York: Wiley.
35.
KantI (1953) Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
36.
KantI (1964) Critique of Pure Reason. London: Macmillan.
37.
KantI (1971) ‘Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose’, in ReissHans (ed.), Kant’s Political Writings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
KistlerM (1999) Causalité et lois de la nature. Paris: Vrin.
39.
KojèveA (1990) L’idée du déterminisme dans la physique classique et dans la physique moderne. Paris: Le livre de poche.
40.
KolmogorovA N (1950) Foundations of the Theory of Probability. New York: Chelsea Publishing Co.
41.
Leite-LopesJEscoubèsB (1995) Sources et évolution de la physique quantique, Sources et évolution de la mécanique quantique. Paris: Masson.
42.
LewisD (1986) ‘Causation’, in id., Philosophical Papers II. Oxford: Oxford UP.
43.
MittelstaedtP (1994) ‘The Constitution of Objects in Kant’s Philosophy and in Modern Physics’, in ParriniP (ed.) Kant and Contemporary Epistemology, pp. 115–129. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
44.
MittelstaedtP (1998) The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Measurement Process. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP.
45.
Mugur-SchächterM (1997) ‘Mécanique quantique, réel et sens’, in BitbolMLaugierS (éds), Physique et réalité, un débat avec Bernard d’Espagnat, pp. 106–155. Paris: Frontières-Diderot.
PiagetJ (1970) Genetic Epistemology. New York: Columbia University Press.
48.
PitowskyI (1994) ‘George Boole’s “Conditions of Possible Experience” and the Quantum Puzzle’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45(1): 95–125.
49.
PopperK (1995) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London and New York: Routledge.
50.
ProustJ (1997) Comment l’esprit vient aux bêtes. Paris: Gallimard.
51.
SchlickM (1979) Philosophical Papers: II (1925–1936). Dordrecht: Reidel.
52.
SchrödingerE (1995) The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, ed. BitbolM. Woodbridge, Conn.: Ox Bow Press.
53.
SelleriF (1994) Le grand débat de la théorie quantique. Paris: Flammarion.
54.
SmithB C (1998) On the Origin of Objects. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
55.
StrawsonP (1966) The Bounds of Sense. An Essay on Kant’s ‘Critique of Pure Reason’. London: Methuen.
56.
von WrightG H (1974) Causality and Determinism. New York: Columbia UP.
57.
ZurekW H (1982) ‘Environment-Induced Superselection Rules’, Physical Review, D26: 1862–1880.