Cultural Essentials versus Universal Values?

Abstract

This paper adopts a comparative approach to analyze the crucial issue of the dynamics between universally shared values and the essentials of different cultures. It presents the ways in which universal values are conceptualized in Western, Indian and Muslim philosophy, presenting not only a historical overview but referring to modern authors such as Daya Krishna, D.P. Chattopadhyaya, Richard Rorty, Muhammad Iqbal, S.H. Nasr and Abdolkarim Soroush to show how these authors implicitly use, or do not use, cultural essential and universal values in their own work. It is eventually claims that comparative philosophy is of crucial importance for the future of philosophical thought in a global world.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bernstein, Richard J. (1991) The New Constellation. The Ethical-Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Chattopadhyaya, D.P. (1982) Environment, Evolution and Values. Studies in Man and Science. New Delhi -Madras: South Asian Publishers Pvt Ltd.

Chattopadhyaya, D.P. (1996) Interdisciplinary Studies in Science, Technology, Philosophy and Culture, vol.6. New Delhi: Project of History of Indian Science, Philosophy and Culture.

Iqbal, Muhammad (1962) The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam . Lahore: Kashmiri Bazar.

Krishna D. (1988) Comparative Philosophy: What It Is and What It Ought to Be. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Nasr S. H. (1965) Islamic Philosophy Re-orientation or Re-understanding . Lahore: 11th Session of the Pakistan Philosophical Congress.

Nasr S.H. (1968) Science and Civilization in Islam. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Soroush, Abdolkarim (2000) Reason, Freedom & Democracy in Islam. Essential Writings of `Abdolkarim Soroush. New York: Oxford University Press.

Rorty, Richard (1989) Contingency, Irony and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.