Social influence and persuasion are not synonyms. This paper traces back the different approaches and distinctions constituting the two concepts and argues that the two research traditions focused respectively on social influence in group processes and on individual attitude change through persuasive communication, could be re-examined from a different vantage point, casting a new light on the continuities between them.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adorno, T. (2002) Introduction to Sociology. Lectures given in 1968 . Cambridge: Polity Press .
2.
Allport, F. (1924) Social Psychology. Boston, MA : Houghton Mifflin .
3.
Asch, S. (1956) `Studies of Independence and Conformity: Minority of One against a Unanimous Majority' , Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70: 1—70 .
4.
Bargh, J. (2006) `What Have We Been Priming All These Years? On the Development, Mechanisms and Ecology of Non conscious Social Behaviour' , European Journal of Social Psychology, 36: 147—68 .
5.
Boudon, R. (1997) L'art de se persuader. Paris : Fayard .
6.
Boudon, R. (2003) Bonnes Raisons. Paris: PUF .
7.
Burnstein, E. and Vinokur, A. (1975) ` What a Person Thinks upon Learning He Has Chosen Differently from Others: Nice Evidence for the Persuasive Arguments Explanation of Choice Shifts ', Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 11: 412—26 .
8.
Burnstein, E. and Vinokur, A. (1977) `Persuasive Argumentation and Social Comparison as Determinants of Attitude Polarization' , Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13: 315—35 .
9.
Chaiken, S. (1980) `Heuristic versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source versus Message Cues in Persuasion' , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39: 752—66 .
10.
Chaiken, S. (1987) `The Heuristic Model of Persuasion', in M. Zanna , J. Olson and C. Herman (eds), Social Influence: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. 5, pp. 3—39. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
11.
Chaiken, S. and Trope, Y. , eds (1999) Dual-processes Theories in Social Psychology. New York: Guilford .
12.
Cialdini, R. , Vincent, J. , Lewis, S. , Catalan, J. , Wheeler, D. and Darby, B. (1975) `Reciprocal Concessions Procedure for Inducing Compliance: The Door-in-the-Face Technique' , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31: 206—15 .
13.
Crano, W. and Álvaro, E. (1998) `The Context/Comparison Model of Social Influence: Mechanisms, Structure and Linkage That Underlie Indirect Attitude Change', in W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone (eds), European Review of Social Psychology , Vol. 8, pp.175—202. Chichester : John Wiley and Sons .
14.
Deutsch, M. and Gerard, H. (1955) `A Study of Normative and Informational Social Influence upon Individual Judgment' , Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51: 629—36 .
15.
Faucheux, C. and Moscovici, S. (1967) `Le style de comportement d'une minorité et son influence sur les réponses d'une majorité' , Bulletin du CERP , 16: 337—60 .
16.
Freedman, J. and Fraser, S. (1966) `Compliance without Pressure: The Foot-in-the-Door Technique' , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4: 195—203 .
17.
Ghiglione, R. (1986) L'homme communiquant. Paris : Armand Colin .
18.
Gigone, D. and Hastie, R. (1996) `The Impact of Information on Group Judgment: A Model and Computer Simulation', in E. Witte and J. Davis (eds), Understanding Group Behavior: Consensual Action by Small Groups, Vol. 1, pp. 221—51. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
19.
Greimas, A. (1976) Sémiotique et Sciences Sociales. Paris: Seuil .
20.
Grize, J. -B. (2004) `Le point de vue de la logique naturelle: Démontrer, prouver, argumenter', in M. Doury et S. Moirand (eds), L'argumentation aujourd'hui. Positions théoriques en confrontation. Paris : Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle .
21.
Hovland, C. , Janis, I. and Kelley, H. (1953) Communication and Persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
22.
Kelman, H. (1958) `Compliance, Identification and Internalization: Three Processes of Attitude Change' , Journal of Conflict Resolution , 2: 51—60 .
23.
Kennedy, J. and Eberhart, R. (2001) Swarm Intelligence. London: Academic Press .
24.
Kruglanski, A. and Thompson, E. (1999) ` Persuasion by a Single Route: A View from the Unimodel ', Psychological Inquiry, 10(2): 83—109 .
25.
Latané, B. (1996) `The Fate of Opinion Minorities in Groups', in E. Witte and J. Davis (eds), Understanding Group Behavior: Consensual Action by Small Groups, Vol. 1, pp. 193—219. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
26.
Latané, B. and L'Herron, T. (1996) ` Social Clustering in the Conformity Game: Dynamic Social Impact in Electronic Groups ', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70: 1218—30 .
27.
Latané, B. and Wolf, S. (1981) `The Social Impact of Majorities and Minorities' , Psychological Review, 88: 438—53 .
28.
Laurens, S. and Moscovici, S. (2005) `The Confederate's and Others' Self-Conversion: A Neglected Phenomenon' , Journal of Social Psychology, 145(2): 191—207 .
29.
Leibniz, G.W. (1765) Nouveaux Essais sur l'entendement humain, Livre iv, ch. xvi, para 6.
30.
Lewin, K. (1948) Resolving Social Conflicts. New York: Harper .
31.
Lewin, K. (1951) Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper .
32.
Marková, I. (2003) Dialogicality and Social Representations: The Dynamics of the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
33.
Martin, R. (1998) ` Majority and Minority Influence Using the Afterimage Paradigm: A Series of Attempted Replications ', Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34: 1—26 .
34.
Montmollin, G. (1984) `Le changement d'attitude', in S. Moscovici (ed.), Psychologie sociale. Paris: PUF .
35.
Moscovici, S. (1972) `Society and Theory in Social Psychology', in J. Israel and H. Tajfel (eds), The Context of Social Psychology: A Critical Assessment, pp. 17—68. London: Academic Press .
36.
Moscovici, S. (1976) Psychologie des minorités actives. Paris: PUF . (First edition in English, Social Influence and Social Change, 1979.)
37.
Moscovici, S. (1980) `Toward a Theory of Conversion Behaviour', in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 13, pp. 209—39. London: Academic Press .
38.
Moscovici, S. (1984) `Introduction. Le domaine de la psychologie sociale' , in S. Moscovici (ed.), Psychologie Sociale, pp. 5—22. Paris: PUF .
39.
Moscovici, S. (1992) `The Discovery of Group Polarization', in D. Granberg and G. Sarup (eds), Social Judgments and Intergroup Relations: Essays in Honour of Musafer Sherif, pp. 107—27. New York : Springer-Verlag .
40.
Moscovici, S. (1993) `The Return of the Unconscious' , Social Research, 60: 39—63 .
41.
Moscovici, S. and Doise, W. (1992) Dissensions and Consensus. Paris: PUF .
42.
Moscovici, S. and Zavalloni, M. (1969) ` The Group as Polarizer of Attitudes ', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12: 125—35 .
43.
Moscovici, S. , Lage, E. and Naffrechoux, X. (1969) `Influence of a Consistent Minority on the Response of a Majority in Colour Perception Task' , Sociometry, 32: 365—79 .
44.
Myers, D. (2004) Exploring Social Psychology, 3rd edn. Boston: McGraw-Hill .
45.
Parsons, T. (1963a) ` On the Concept of Political Power ', Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 107(3) June.
46.
Parsons, T. (1963b) ` On the Concept of Influence ', Public Opinion Quarterly, spring.
47.
Pérez, J. et Mugny, G. (1993) Influences sociales: La théorie de l'élaboration du conflit . Paris : Delachaux et Niestlé.
48.
Petty, R. and Cacioppo, J. (1981) Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown .
49.
Petty, R. and Cacioppo, J. (1986) `The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion ', in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 19, pp. 123—205. New York: Academic Press .
50.
Sherif, M. (1936) The Psychology of Social Norms. New York: Harper .
51.
Sherif, M. and Sherif, C. (1967) `Attitude as the Individual's Own Categories: The Social-Judgment— Involvement Approach to Attitude and Attitude Change' , in C. Sherif and M. Sherif (eds), Attitudes: Ego Involvement and Change, pp. 105—39. New York: Wiley .
52.
Simmel, G. (1999) Sociologie: étude sur les formes de la socialisation (1908), French transl. by L. Deroche-Gurcel and S. Muller. Paris: PUF .
53.
Stoner, J. (1961) A comparison of individual and group decision involving risk. Unpublished masters thesis, MIT .
54.
Tomasi di Lampedusa, G. (1991) The Leopard, transl. A. Colquhoun. New York: Knopf .
55.
Vinokur, A.Trope, Y. and Burnstein, E. (1975) ` A Decision Making Analysis of Persuasive Argumentation and the Choice Shift Effect ', Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11(2): 127—48 .
56.
Wallach, M. , Kogan, N. and Bem, D. (1962) `Group Influence on Individual Risk Taking' , Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65: 75—86 .
57.
Williams, B. (2002) Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
