Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is characterised by the development of a fibrotic mass in the prelumbar or presacral area which becomes clinically significant when it causes ureteral obstruction. New imaging techniques have improved accuracy of the morphological approach to the disease, but urography and sequential renal scintigraphy are still important for assessing ureteral involvement. The role of imaging techniques is discussed and current diagnostic and therapeutic tools are evaluated.
KuninM., GoodwinW.E.: The encased ureter: bullet and bodkin pattern, a reliable radiographic sign. Br. J. Urol., 66(5): 471–474, 1990.
7.
ArgerP.H., StolzJ.L., MillerW.T.: Retroperitoneal fibrosis: an analysis of the clinical spectrum and roentgenographic signs. AJR, 119: 812–821, 1973.
8.
SaldinoR.M., PalubinskasA.J.: Medial placement of the ureter: a normal variant which may simulate retroperitoneal fibrosis. J. Urol., 107: 582–585, 1972.
CampbellJ.E.: A cinefluorographic analysis of normal pyeloureteral dynamics. Invest. Radiol., 1: 198–204, 1966.
12.
KlainM., ImbriacoM., CuocoloA., CelentanoL., MaureaS., CarrilloF., SalvatoreM.: Valutazione morfofunzionale del rene nella fibrosi retroperitoneale; correlazione tra TC, MR e scintigrafia. Radiol. Med., 88: 146–149, 1994.
13.
MohsinJ., KimC.K.: Renal scintigraphy in patients with retroperitoneal fibrosis. Clin. Nucl. Med., 21: 390–393, 1996.
14.
LepejJ., KlimentJ., HorakV., BuchanecJ., MarosovaA., BelakovaS.: A new approach in radionuclide imaging to ureteric peristalsis using Tc-MAG3. Nucl. Med. Comm., 12: 237–241, 1991.
15.
SandersR.C., DuffyT., McloughlinM.G., WalshP.C.: Sonography in the diagnosis of retroperitonal fibrosis. J. Urol., 118: 944–946, 1977.
16.
CornudF., BlangyS., SibertA., BenacerrafR.: Echographie abdominale dans le diagnostic et la surveillance des fibroses rétropéritonéales. J. Radiol., 64: 111–115, 1983.
BennaniS., DebbaghA., JoualA., el-MriniM., BenjellounS.: Anueries obstructives. A propos de 30 cas. Ann. Urol., 29(3): 159–162, 1995.
19.
Dalla PalmaL., Rocca RossettiS., Pozzi-MucelliR.S., RizzatoG.: Computed tomography in the diagnosis of retroperitoneal fibrosis. Urol. Radiol., 3: 77–83, 1981.
20.
LemaitreG., RenouardO., KasbarianM.: Usefulness of computed tomography in the diagnosis and follow-up of retroperitoneal fibrosis. J. Belge Radiol., 67: 13–19, 1984.
21.
RheeR.Y., GloviczkiP., LuthraH.S., StansonA.W., BowerT.C., CherryK.J.Jr.: Iliocaval complications of retroperitoneal fibrosis. Am. J. Surg., 168(2): 179–183, 1994.
22.
DegesysG.E., DunnickN.R., SilvermanP.M., CohanR.H., IllescasF.F., CastagnoA.: Retroperitoneal fibrosis: use of CT in distinguishing among possible causes. AJR, 146: 57–60, 1986.
23.
RubensteinW.A., GrayG., AuhY.H., HonigC.L., ThorbjarnarsonB., WilliamsJ.J., HaimesA.B., ZirinskyK., KazamE.: CT of fibrous tissues and tumours with sonographic correlation. AJR, 147: 1067–1074, 1986.
24.
ThomasM., ChisholmG.D.: Retroperitoneal fibrosis associated with malignant disease. J. Urol., 28: 445–458, 1973.
25.
KendallA.R., LakeyW.H.: Sclerosing Hodgkin's disease vs idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. J. Urol., 35: 284–291, 1961.
26.
YuhW.T.C., BarloonT.J., SickelsW.J., KramolowskyE.V., WilliamsR.D.: Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and follow-up of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. J. Urol., 141: 602–605, 1989.
27.
BachmannG., BauerT., RauW.S.: MTR und CT in diagnose und Verlaufskontrolle der idiopathischen retroperitonealen fibrosis. Radiologe, 35: 200–207, 1995.
28.
BrooksA.P., ReznecR.H., WebbJ.A.W.: Magnetic resonance imaging in idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: measurement of T1 relaxation time. Br. J. Radiol., 63: 842–844, 1990.
29.
ArriveL., HricakH., TavarresN.J., MillerT.R.: Malignant versus nonmalignant retroperitoneal fibrosis: differentiation with MR imaging. Radiology, 172: 139–142, 1989.
30.
LeeJ.K.T., GlazerH.S.: Controversy in the MR imaging appearance of fibrosis. Radiology, 177: 21–22, 1990.
