Abstract
Twenty-eight elderly high-risk (ASA 3) patients undergoing elective major urological surgery were prospectively randomised to receive either combined epidural and general anaesthesia (CEGA) or general anaesthesia (GA). The use of intraoperative vasopressors was significantly higher in the CEGA group (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between groups with regard to blood loss, volume replacement, postoperative complications and mortality. The CEGA allowed saving of inhalatory anaesthetic agents (p<0.001) and a shorter total hospital stay than GA (p<0.0044). The authors conclude that the CEGA exerted a significant beneficial effect on the intraoperative outcome in a group of high-risk surgical patients.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
