The authors describe their experience with 40 patients subjected to TUIP for BPH from May ‘92 to November ‘96. The criteria used for including patients in the study were based on the prostatic weight calculated ultrasonically by means of the ellipsoid rule. Results were similar to those reported in world literature. The authors conclude that although TURP is the best endoscopic technique for BPH, TUIP is also important since both catheterisation and hospitalisation times are shorter with resulting cost savings.
BerryS.J., CoffeyD.S., WalshP.H.: The development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age. J. Urol., 132: 474–479, 1984.
2.
OrandiA.: Transurethral incision of the prostate. J. Urol., 110: 229, 1973.
3.
PuppoP., PerachinoM., RicciottiG.: Transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP) a urodynamical and clinical study after our follow-up. Urodinamica, 3: 75, 1993.
4.
ChristensenM.M., AagaardJ., MadsenP.O.: Transurethral resection versus transurethral incision of the prostate. A prospective randomized study. Urol. Clin. North Am., 17: 621, 1990.
5.
EdwardsL.E.: Transurethral resection of the prostate and bladder neck incision: a review of 700 cases. Br. J. Urol., 57: 168, 1985.
6.
OrandiA.: Transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP) 646 cases in 15 years a chronological appraisal. Br. J. Urol., 57: 703, 1985.
7.
PuppoP., PerachinoM., RicciottiG., SozzoW., SedidoD.: Transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP): still the least invasive treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia? Acta Urol. Ital., 4: 177–183, 1995.
