Radical prostatectomy is the treatment of choice for stage A e B prostatic carcinoma and optional in locally advanced forms. This surgical treatment, however, can lead to various problems such as preservation of sexual function, urinary continence and local recurrence. We present our experience to show how preservation of bladder neck fibres can influence urinary continence without affecting local recurrence. The latter was found in 13.8% of patients, while 90.7% were continent within 24 hours after removal of the catheter.
Van de OudenD., DavidsonP.J.T., HopW., SchroderF.H.: Radical prostatectomy as a monotherapy for locally advanced (stage T3) prostate cancer. J. Urol., 151: 646–651, 1994.
5.
AckermanD.A., BarryJ.M., WicklundR.A., OlssonN., LoweB.A.: Analysis of risk factor associated with prostate cancer extension to the surgical margin and pelvic node metastasis at radical prostatectomy. J. Urol., 150: 1845–1850, 1993.
6.
BresselM.: Technical features of radical prostatectomy in stage A prostatic carcinoma. In: Incidental carcinoma of the prostate.AltweinJ.E., FaulP., SchneiderW., Eds. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1991.
7.
HerrH.: Quality of life of incontinent men after radical prostatectomy. J. Urol., 151: 652–654, 1994.
8.
RamonJ., LeandriP., RossignolG., GuterA.: Urinary continence following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Brit. J. Urol., 74: 47–51, 1993.
9.
AbramsP.: Urodynamic and the International Continence Society of age. Brit. J. Urol., 72: 527–533, 1993.
10.
CatalonaW.J., BaslerW.J.: Return of erection and urinary continence following nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol., 150: 905–907, 1993.
11.
EpsteinN., CarmichaelM., PizovG., WalshP.: Influence of capsular penetration on progression following radical prostatectomy: a study of 196 cases with long-term follow-up. J. Urol., 150: 135–141, 1993.
12.
BraslisK.G., BowsherW.G., JoyceG., PetresJ., CostelloA.J.: Evolving expedience with radical prostatectomy. B. J. Urol., 72: 341–348, 1993.
13.
Van de OudenD., BentvelsenF.M., BoevèE.R., SchroderF.H.: Positive margins after radical prostatectomy: correlation with local recurrence and distant progression. Brit. J. Urol., 72: 489–494, 1993.
14.
OnetoF., MartoranaG., MedicaM., FranchiniR., MaiettaG., CussottoM., SchenoneM., GiulianiL.: Correlazioni clinico patologiche nel carcinoma prostatico clinicamente localizzato: significato per la scelta della tecnica di prostatectomia radicale. Acta Urologica Italica, (suppl.)4: 171–172, 1992.
15.
VillersA., McNealJ.E., FreihaF.S., Boccon-GibodL., StameyT.A.: Invasion of Denonvillers fascia in radical prostatectomy specimens. J. Urol., 149: 793, 1993.
16.
AlgabaF.: Penetrazione capsulare e margini in workshop on Carcinoma prostatico. Fattori prognostici e valutazione patologiche del campione bioptico dopo Prostatectomia radicale. Portobuffolè (TV), 17–19 giugno, pp. 83–88, 1994.
17.
LottiT.: Penetrazione capsulare e margini in Workshop on Carcinoma prostatico. Fattori prognostici e valutazione patologiche del campione bioptico dopo prostatectomia radicale. Portobuffolè (TV), 17–19 giugno, pp. 72–75, 1994.
18.
JonlerM, MessingE.M., RhodesP.R., BruskewitzR.C.: Sequelae of radical prostatectomy. Brit. J. Urol., 74: 352–358, 1994.
19.
De GiovanniM., TagliabileA., CainiD., FanciullacciF., ZanolloA.: Prostatectomia retropubica radicale: una esperienza di 72 casi. Acta Urologica Italica, (suppl.)4: 173, 1992.
