The authors, according to their preliminary experience with laparoscopic lymphadenectomy and Mini-lap performed for the staging of 15 patients with prostatic carcinoma, have compared the morbidity, the diagnostic accuracy rate and costs of these two techniques, referring critically to international literature and evaluating the real efficacy of a delayed laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy prior to radical prostatectomy. Moreover they have tested the general applicability of the equation by Roach et al., which was empirically derived from a nomogram reported by Partin et al., to predict the risk of lymph node metastasis, applying it to a selected group of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy from 1992 to 1994 in order to maximize the utility of lymphadenectomy for prostatic cancer staging.
PaulsonD.F., LinG.H., HinshawW., SthepaniS.: The Uro-Oncology Research Group: radical surgery versus radiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. J. Urol., 128: 502, 1982.
2.
ReinerW.G., WalshP.C.: An anatomical approach to the surgical management of the dorsal vein and Santorinis plexus during radical retropubic surgery. J. Urol., 121: 198, 1979.
3.
WalshP.C., LeporH., EgglestonJ.C.: Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate, 4: 473, 1994.
4.
LieskovskyG., SkinnerD.G., WeisemburgerT.: Pelvic lymphadenectomy in the management of carcinoma of the prostate. J. Urol., 124: 635, 1990.
5.
BensonK.H., WatsonR.A., SpringD.B.: The value of computerized tomography in evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes. J. Urol., 126: 63, 1981.
6.
HricakH., DoomsG.C., JeffreyR.B.: Prostatic carcinoma: staging by clinical assessment, C.T. and M.R. imaging. Radiology, 162: 331, 1987.
7.
Van PoppelH., AmeyeF., OyenR., Van deVoorde W., BaertL.: Accuracy of combined computerized tomography and fine needle aspiration cytology in lymph node staging of localized prostatic carcinoma. J. Urol., 151: 1310, 1994.
8.
LucianiL., PiscioliF., MenichelliE., PusiolT.: The value and role of percutaneous pelvic lymph node aspiration biopsy in definitive staging of prostatic and bladder carcinoma. Eur. Urol., 9: 216, 1983.
9.
KavoussiL.R.: Editorial: techniques for nodal staging in prostate cancer. J. Urol., 151: 1324, 1994.
10.
HermansenD.K., WhitmoreW.F.: Frozen section lymph node analysis in pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer. J. Urol., 139: 1074, 1983.
11.
ZattoniF., GuazzieriS., ZamboliniT., LemboA.: Attendibilità dell'esame istologico al congelatore in corso di linfoadenectomia stadiante per neoplasia della prostata e del testicolo. Atti 57° Congresso SIU, Bari, 276–284, 1994.
12.
SchuesslerW.W., VancaillieT.G., ReichH., GriffithD.P.: Transperitoneal endosurgical lymphadenectomy in patients with localized prostate cancer. J. Urol., 145: 988, 1991.
13.
SchuesslerW.W., PhanandD., ValcaillieT.G.: Laparoscopic standard pelvic node dissection for carcinoma of the prostate: is it accurate?J. Urol., 150: 833, 1993.
ArtibaniW., ZattoniF., PaganoF.: La linfoadenectomia iliaco-otturatoria con mini-accesso parainguinale. Atti 4° Congresso Nazionale SIURO, Grado9–11 novembre 1994.
16.
MaffezziniM., CarmignaniG., PerachinoM., PuppoP., MartorsiF., GuazzoniG., GallucciM., Di SilverioF., MorelliM., MutoG.: Benefits and complications of laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy for detection of stage D1 prostate cancer: a multicenter experience. Eur. Urol., 27: 135, 1995.
17.
DanellaJ.F., de KerninJ.B., SmithR.B., SteckelJ.: The contemporary incidence of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer: implications for laparoscopic lymph node dissection. J. Urol., 149: 1488, 1993.
18.
WolfJ.S.junior, ShinoharaK., KerlikowskeK.M., NarayamP., StollerM.L., CarrolP.R.: Selection of patients for laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy prior to radical prostatectomy: a decision analysis. Urology, 42: 690, 1993.
19.
PartinA.W., YooJ., BallentineCarter H., PearsonJ.D., ChanD.W., EpsteinJ.I., WalshP.C.: The use of prostate specific antigen, clinical stage and Gleason Score to predict pathological stage in men with localized prostate cancer. J. Urol., 150: 110, 1993.
20.
RoachM., MarquezC., YvoH.S., NarayanP., NseyoV.O., NavvabZ., CarrolP.R.: Predicting the risk of lymph node involvement using the pre-treatment prostate specific antigen and Gleason Score in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Int. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 28: 33, 1994.
21.
TroxelS., WinfieldH.N.: Comparative financial analysis of laparoscopic versus open pelvic lymph node dissection for men with cancer of the prostate. J. Urol., 151: 675, 1994.
22.
PerrottiM., GentleD., KaufmanR.P.: Mini-lap pelvic lymph node dissection (MLPLND) minimizes morbidity, cost and hospitalization of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). J. Urol., 151: 498A, 1994.
