Abstract
The use of tumoral markers and especially of BHCG and AFP in the diagnosis, staging and follow-up of patients affected by testicle germinai neoplasms is now widespread. Nevertheless, controversies stili exist in each one of these fields. Especially for clinical staging, high percentages of understaging of stage I tumours are reported in literature with considerable effects on therapeutical indications and prognosis. The Authors attempt a criticai review on the use of markers for diagnosis and staging of testicular neoplasms based upon their own experience of 79 cases over a 14-year period.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
