The wide-spread use of ESWL, especially if performed with anesthesia-free equipment, in treating urolithiasis patients, is justified by low rates in morbidity and complications. The best cost-benefit ratio and special applications are reviewed.
EisenbergerF., MillerK., RassweilerJ.: Stone Therapy in Urology.G. Thieme Medical Publishers, Chapt. 3, pag. 66, 1991.
2.
LingemanJ.E. in “Urinary calculi”.Lea & FebigerPhiladelphia1989.
3.
ChaussyC., FuchsG.: Current state and future developments of noninvasive treatment of human urinary stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J. Urol.141: 782, 1989.
4.
DrachG., WeberC., DonovanJ.: Treatment of pacemaker patients with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: experience from 2 Continents. J. Urol., 143: 895–896, 1990.
5.
PsihramisK., DrederS.: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of calyceal diverticula calculi. J. Urol., 138: 707, 1987.
6.
PattersonD., SeguraJ., Le RoyA.: Long-term follow-up of patients treated by percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy for struvite staghorn calculi. J. Endourol., 1: 177, 1987.
7.
HubnerW., HashekH., SchramekP.: Der Kelchstein: Verlaufskontrolle dei 63 Patienten ueber 1–21 Jahre, Verhandlungsbericht der Deutschen Gesellschaft fuer Urologie, 36. Tagung, 3 bis 6. Oktober, 1984.
8.
UenoA., KawamuraT., OgawaA.: Relation of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to size. Urology, 10: 544, 1977.
9.
MillerK., HautmannR.: Treatment of distal ureteral calculi with ESWL: experience with more than 100 consecutive cases. World J. Urol., 5: 259, 1987.
10.
McCulloughD.: Effects of shock waves on the rat ovary. J. Urol., 141: 666, 1989.
11.
GlennJ.: Analysis of 51 patients with horseshoe kidney. New Engl. J. Med., 261: 684, 1959.
12.
KollnC., BoatmanD., SchmidtJ.: Horseshoe kidney: a review of 105 patients. J. Urol., 107: 203, 1972.
13.
PittsW., MueckeE.: Horseshoe kidneys: a 40 year experience. J. Urol., 113: 743, 1975.
14.
EvansW., ResnickM.: Horseshoe kidney and urolithiasis. J. Urol., 125: 620, 1981.
15.
ComarrA., KawaichiG., BorsE.: Renal calculosis of patients with traumatic cord lesions. J. Urol., 87: 647, 1962.
16.
LarsenJ., PhilipJ.: Urolithiasis and poliomyelitis. Urol., Int.13: 40, 1962.
17.
KrachtH., BuscherH.: Formation of staghorn calculi and their surgical implications in paraplegics and tetraplegics. Paraplegia, 12: 98, 1974.
18.
GriffithD., McCueP., LeeH.: Stone cancer: palliative treatment with acetohydroxamic acid. World J. Urol., 1: 170, 1983.
19.
SeguraJ., EricksonS., WilsonD.: Infected renal lithiasis: result of long-term surgical and medical management. In SmithL., RobertsonW., FinlaysonB. (eds): “Urolithiasis Clinical and Basic Research”.New York, Plenum Press, 1981.
20.
StarzlT., GrothC., PutnamC.: Urological complications in 216 human recipients of renal transplants. Ann. Surg., 172: 1, 1970.
21.
NormannE., FryjordetA., HalvorsenS.: Stones in renal transplants. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 14: 73, 1980.
22.
MundyA., PodestaM., BewickM.: The urological complications of 1000 renal transplants. Br. J. Urol., 53: 397, 1981.
23.
GreiffF., DreznickZ., JacobE.: Calculus in 16-year-old cadaveric kidney transplant: a unique case and literature review. Nephron, 55: 423–428, 1990.
24.
EisenbergerF., MillerK., RassweilerJ.: Stone Therapy in Urology.G. Thieme Medical Publishers, Chapt. 3, pag. 66, 1991.
