BatesP., BradleyW. E.: Third report on the standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Procedures related to the evaluation of micturition: Pressure-flow relationships. Residual Urine. Brit. J. Urol., 52; 348 (1980).
2.
BhatiaN. N., BergmanA.: Urodynamic effects of a vaginal pessary in women with stress urinary incontinence. Amer. J. Obst. Gynec., 147; 876 (1983).
3.
BottacciniM. R., GleasonD. M.: On the nature of urinary outflow resistance. Proc. 2nd Joint ICS/UDS Meeting, p. 22, Aachen 1983.
4.
FantlJ. A., SmithP. J.: Fluid weight uroflowmetry in women. Amer. J. Obst. Gynec, 145; 1017 (1983).
5.
FarrarD. J., OsborneJ. L.: A urodynamic view of bladder outflow obstruction in the female: factors influencing the results of treatment. Brit. J. Urol., 47; 815 (1975).
6.
Fischer vonB., DreherE.: The rate of increase of urinary flowrate during micturition: A valuable urodynamic parameter for the diagnosis and diferentiation of abnormalities of micturition in women. Proc. Joint ICS/UDS Meeting, p. 10, Los Angeles1980.
7.
GleasonD. M., BotacciniM. R.: Urodynamic norms in female voiding. II. The flow modulation zone and voiding dysfunction. J. Urol., 227; 495 (1982).
8.
GodecC. J., EshoJ.: Correlation among cystometry, urethral pressure profilometry and pelvic floor electromyography in evaluation of female patients with voiding dysfunction symptoms. J. Urol., 124; 678 (1980).
9.
GriffithsD. J.: Urethral resistance: an attempt to reduce confusion. Proc. 2ndJoint ICS/UDS Meeting, p. 25, Aachen1983.
10.
GriffithsD. J., ScholtmeijerR. J.: Precise urodynamic assessment of meatal and distal urethral stenosis in girls. Neurourol. Urodyn., 1; 89 (1982).
11.
HasegawaN., KitagawaY.: The effect of abdominal pressure on urinary flow rate. J. Urol., 130; 107 (1983).
12.
MeyhoffH. H., GriffithsD. J.: Clinical applications of momentum flux measurements with special reference to detrusor hyperreflexia and meatal stenosis. Urol. Res., 8; 71 (1980).
13.
ReesD. L. P, WhitfieldH. N.: Urodynamic findings in adult females with frequency and dysuria. Brit. J. Urol.47; 853 (1975).
14.
SandriS. D., FanciullacciF.: Clinical importance of pressure-flow study to detect doubtful proximal urethral obstruction. IX Congr. Ital. Soc. Urodynamics, p. 97, Ravenna1985.
15.
ShulmanY., BrownJ.: Pressure-flow analysis of micturition: A reappraisal. Urology, 19; 450 (1982).
16.
SjobergB., NymanC.: Hydrodynamics of micturition in stress incontinent women. Comparison of pressure and flow at different micturition volumes in stress incontinent and continent women. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol., 16; 1 (1982).
17.
SjobergB., NymanC. R.: Hydrodynamics of micturition in healthy females: Pressure and flow at different micturition volumes. Urol. Intern., 36; 23 (1981).
18.
StantonS. L., OzsoyC.: Voiding difficulties in the female: Prevalence, clinical and urodynamic review. Obst. Gynec, 61; 144 (1983).
19.
SussetJ. G., GhoniemG. M.: Abnormal urethral compliance in females. Diagnosis, results and treatment. J. Urol., 129; 1063 (1983).
20.
Turner-WarwickR. T.: Impaired voiding efficiency and retention in the female. Clin. Obst. Gynec, 5; 193 (1978).
21.
ZanolloA., CatanzaroF.: Ritenzione vescicale e sindrome uretrale nella donna. Fiuggi Ed. 1985.
22.
ZinnerN. R., GessnerF. B.: Micturitional total urethral pressure profile: A method of recording local urethral flow resistance. Proc. 2ndJoint ICS/UDS Meeting, p. 5, Aachen1983.
