AbbottA. C.: Uretero-ileo-sigmoidostomy: some observations on its limitations and dangers in urinary diversion based on experimental studies on mongrel dogs. Canad. J. Surg., 4; 356 (1961).
2.
BassoD. E.: The efficacy and applicability of an intussuscepted conical valve in preventing rigurgitation and leakage of intestinal contents. Ann. Surg., 133; 477 (1951).
3.
BergJ.: The treatment of ectopia vesicae. Surg., Gynec. & Obst., 5; 461 (1907).
4.
BrickerE. M.: Bladder substitution after pelvic evisceration. Surg. Clin. N. Amer., 30; 1511 (1950).
5.
ButcherH. R.: Ileal conduit method of ureteral urinary diversion. Ann. Surg., 156; 682 (1962).
6.
DelgadoG. E., MueckeE. C.: Evaluation of 80 cases of ileal conduits in children: indications, complications and results. J. Urol., 109; 311 (1973).
7.
GentilF.: Bilateral ureteroileal anastomosis with ileo-rectosigmoidostomy, following cystectomy for cancer of bladder: preliminary report. J. Urol., 80; 20 (1958).
8.
HendrenW. H.: Exstrophy of the bladder: alternative method of management. J. Urol., 115; 195 (1976).
9.
HopewellJ.: The hazards of uretero-intestinal anastomosis. Ann. Royal Coll. Surg. Engl., 24; 159 (1959).
10.
HoutappelH. C. E M.: Experience with uretero-ileosigmoidostomy. Brit. J. Urol., 35; 277 (1963).
11.
JaffeB. M., BrickerE. M., ButcherH. R.jr.: Surgical complications of ileal segment urinary diversion. Ann. Surg., 167; 367 (1968).
12.
KafetsioulisA., SwinneyJ.: Urinary diversion by conduit. A long-term follow-up. Brit. J. Urol., 40; 1 (1968).
13.
KnoxA. I. S, JagoR. H.: The value of intestinal valves in urinary diversion: an experimental study. Brit. J. Urol., 47; 391 (1975).
14.
LeadbetterW. F., ClarkeB. G.: Five years’ experience with uretero-enterostomy by the «combined» technique. J. Urol., 73; 67 (1955).
MoggR. A., SymeR. R.: The results of urinary diversion using the colonic conduit. Brit. J. Urol., 41; 434 (1969).
17.
MoorsD. E.: An intestinal valve in urinary diversion. J. Urol., 109; 824 (1973).
18.
MurphyJ. J., SchoembergH. W.: Survey of long-term results of total urinary diversion Brit. J. Urol., 39; 700 (1967).
19.
NiehP. T.: Staged ureterocolocolostomy urinary diversion. J. Urol., 120; 402 (1978).
20.
PinckB. D.: Ureteroileosigmoidostomy. J. Urol., 102; 37 (1969).
21.
RibaL.: Experimental ureteral transplants to an ileal segment anastomosed to the rectum. J. Urol., 70; 426 (1953)
22.
RichieJ. P., SkinnerD. G.: Urinary diversion: the physiological rationale for non-refluxing colonic conduits. Brit. J. Urol., 47; 269 (1975).
23.
RivardJ. Y.: Colonic neoplasms following ureterosigmoidostomy. J. Urol., 113; 781 (1975).
24.
SchlesingerR. E., BallonS. C., WatringW. G., MooreJ. G.: The choice of an intestinal segment for a urinary conduit. Surg., Gynec. & Obst., 148; 45 (1979)
25.
SchmidtJ. D.: Complications, results and problems of ileal conduit diversions. J. Urol., 109; 210 (1973).
26.
SmallM. P.: Clinical and experimental evaluation of ileal segment urinary diversion. Amer. J. Surg., 115; 782 (1968)
27.
SymmondsR. E., GibbsC. P.: Urinary diversion by way of sigmoid conduit. Surg., Gynec. & Obst., 129; 687 (1970).
28.
SymmondsR. E.: Exenterative operations; experience with 118 patients. Amer. J. Obst. Gynec, 101; 66 (1968)
29.
TurnbullR. B., HigginsC. C.: Ileal valve pouch for urinary diversion. Clevel. Clin. Quart., 24; 187 (1957) (cit. da Knox e Jago).
30.
UrdanetaL. F.: Late development of primary carcinoma of the colon following ureterosigmoidostomy. Ann. Surg., 164; 503 (1966).
31.
ZinckeH., SeguraJ. W.: Ureterosigmoidostomy: critical review of 173 cases. J. Urol., 113; 324 (1975).
