to investigate the association between anogenital distance (AGD) and the risk of Late-onset Hypogonadism (LOH).
Methods:
We prospectively recruited 145 consecutive patients referred for transrectal prostate biopsy due to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) elevation or abnormal digital rectal examination, between September 2019 and December 2021. Two variants of AGD, anus to scrotum base (AGDas) and anus to dorsal insertion of penis (AGDap) were measured. Serum total testosterone levels in fasting conditions between 07.00 and 11.00 h were determined. Patients filled out the Aging Males’ Symptoms (AMS) scale questionnaire.
Results:
LOH was diagnosed in 29% of the participants and presented both AGDs shorter than men without LOH, with an AGDap of 116.09 mm (9.02 mm) versus 128.71 (10.76), and an AGDas 29.70 (8.01) versus 39.93 (11.64); both p < 0.05. ANCOVA test showed a significant association between the presence of LOH and both AGD measurements. Besides, AGD measurements presented adequate accuracy for the diagnosis of LOH.
Conclusions:
This work adds to the scientific evidence that AGD—a biomarker of fetal exposure—could provide a non-invasive measure to address LOH, providing a potential useful clinical tool.
ThankamonyAPasterskiVOngKK, et al. Anogenital distance as a marker of androgen exposure in humans. Andrology2016; 4(4): 616–625. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26846869
2.
FowlerPABhattacharyaSFlanniganS, et al. Maternal cigarette smoking and effects on androgen action in male offspring: unexpected effects on second-trimester anogenital distance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab2011; 96(9): E1502–E1506.
3.
EisenbergMLHsiehT-LipshultzLI. The relationship between anogenital distance and age. Andrology2013; 1(1): 90–93.
4.
AdibiJJLeeMKNaimiAI, et al. Human chorionic gonadotropin partially mediates phthalate association with male and female anogenital distance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab2015; 100(9): E1216–E1224.
5.
VafeiadiMAgramuntSPapadopoulouE, et al. In utero exposure to dioxins and dioxin-like compounds and anogenital distance in newborns and infants. Environ Health Perspect2013; 121(1): 125–130.
6.
MiaoMYuanWHeY, et al. In utero exposure to bisphenol-A and anogenital distance of male offspring. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol2011; 91(10): 867–872.
7.
PapadopoulouEVafeiadiMAgramuntS, et al. Anogenital distances in newborns and children from Spain and Greece: predictors, tracking and reliability. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol2013; 27(1): 89–99.
8.
EisenbergMLJensenTKWaltersRC, et al. The relationship between anogenital distance and reproductive hormone levels in adult men. J Urol2012; 187(2): 594–598.
9.
EisenbergMLHsiehMHWaltersRC, et al. The relationship between anogenital distance, fatherhood, and fertility in adult men. PLoS One2011; 6(5): e18973–e18973. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21589916
10.
MendiolaJStahlhutRWJørgensenN, et al. Shorter anogenital distance predicts poorer semen quality in young men in Rochester, New York. Environ Health Perspect2011; 119(7): 958–963. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21377950
11.
LuYFanSSongY, et al. The association between anogenital distance and benign prostatic hyperplasia related lower urinary tract symptoms in Chinese aging men. World J Urol2021; 39(7): 2645–2653.
WuFCWTajarABeynonJM, et al. Identification of late-onset hypogonadism in middle-aged and elderly men. New Engl J Med2010; 363(2): 123–135.
14.
HeinemannLASaadFZimmermannT, et al. The aging males’ symptoms (AMS) scale: update and compilation of international versions. Health Qual Life Outcomes2003; 1(1): 15.
15.
FeldmanHAGoldsteinIHatzichristouDG, et al. Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Urol1994; 151(1): 54–61.
16.
AraujoABO’DonnellABBrambillaDJ, et al. Prevalence and incidence of androgen deficiency in middle-aged and older men: estimates from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab2004; 89(12): 5920–5926.
17.
CapogrossoPCarvalhoJCoronaG, et al. Sexual and reproductive health EAU Guidelines. Arnhem, The Netherlands: EAU Guidelines Office, 2023. https://uroweb.org/guidelines.
18.
Oñate-CeldránJArense-GonzaloJMendiolaJ, et al. Study of anogenital distance as a diagnostic tool for prostate cancer. Rev Int Androl2019; 17(2): 60–67.
19.
Fuentes-PastorJPellejeroPOrtizI, et al. Association between late-onset hypogonadism syndrome plus metabolic syndrome and prostate cancer and its aggressiveness. Actas Urol Esp2016; 40(7): 440–445.
20.
KheraMAdaikanGBuvatJ, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of testosterone deficiency: recommendations from the Fourth International Consultation for Sexual Medicine (ICSM 2015). J Sex Med2016; 13(12): 1787–1804.
21.
ZhouNSunLYangH, et al. Anogenital distance is associated with serum reproductive hormones, but not with semen quality in young men. Hum Reprod2016; 31(5): 958–967.
22.
ParraMDMendiolaJJørgensenN, et al. Anogenital distance and reproductive parameters in young men. Andrologia2016; 48(1): 3–10.
23.
PriskornLBangAKNordkapL, et al. Re: Anogenital distance is associated with semen quality but not reproductive hormones in 1106 young men from the general population. Hum Reprod2019; 202(4): 646–647.
24.
MendiolaJMelgarejoMMoñino-GarcíaM, et al. Is anogenital distance associated with semen quality in male partners of subfertile couples?Andrology2015; 3(4): 672–676.
25.
Maldonado-CárcelesABSánchez-RodríguezCVera-PorrasEM, et al. Anogenital distance, a biomarker of prenatal androgen exposure is associated with prostate cancer severity. Prostate2017; 77(4): 406–411.
26.
SertkayaZErtaşKTokuçE. The relationship between premature ejaculation and anogenital distance. Andrologia2020; 52(6): e13571.
27.
EisenbergMLShyMWaltersRC, et al. The relationship between anogenital distance and azoospermia in adult men. Int J Androl2012; 35(5): 726–730.
28.
DriescheS.VanD. E. NSkakkebaekN. ESharpeR. M, et al. Experimentally induced testicular dysgenesis syndrome originates in the masculinization programming window Experimentally induced testicular dysgenesis syndrome originates in the masculinization programming window. 2017; 2(6): 11–12.
