COVID-19 effect on perioperative findings of flexible/semi-rigid ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy: A match-pair analysis

Abstract

Purpose:

If not treated on time with proper management options, urolithiasis cause serious morphologic and functional alterations in the involved renal units. Like many other pathologies, the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up principles of patients with urinary stones have been negatively affected by the unestimated changes in the healthcare systems dealing intensively with COVID-19 patients. In this present study, we aimed to evaluate and present the possible effects of COVID-19 infection on the ureterorenoscopic stone treatment.

Materials and methods:

Clinical and procedural characteristics of 96 patients undergoing flexible and/or rigid ureterorenoscopy because of urolithiasis between March 2020 and January 2021 were evaluated in a retrospective manner. Obtained data were evaluated after match-pair analysis in a comparative manner between cases with a positive medical history of COVID-19 infection (Group 1, n: 48) and those without any COVID-19 infection (Group 2, n: 48).

Results:

There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups of cases with respect to age, gender, associated comorbidities, and stone characteristics (p > 0.05). The mean serum creatinine level was determined to be higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (1.15 ± 0.59 mg/dl, 0.83 ± 0.21 mg/dl, p = 0.007, respectively). Evaluation of the operative parameters revealed longer mean time from diagnosis to surgery (33.5 ± 14.27 vs 12.12 ± 6.33 days, p = 0.001), operating time, median length of stay in hospital along with higher additional intervention rates, and Clavien-Dindo complication scores again in Group 1 (p < 0.05).

Conclusion:

Our results indicate that the presence of COVID-19 infection anamnesis may affect the clinical and operative parameters of ureteroscopic stone management in cases with urolithiasis due to the possible effects of renal units damage and longer waiting time. Urologists may be aware of these unestimated problems during and after the intervention to take necessary measures for a safe and successful ureteroscopic stone removal.

Keywords

Ureterorenoscopy kidney stone ureteral stone COVID-19 infection

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

World Health Organization. WHO statement regarding cluster of pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China (Internet), https://www.who.int/china/news/detail/09-01-2020-who-statement-regarding-cluster-of-pneumonia-cases-in-wuhan-china (2020, accessed 29 March 2020).

Gorbalenya

Baker

Baric

, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: the species and its viruses – a statement of the Coronavirus Study Group. Nat Microbiol 2020; 5: 536–544.

WHO. WHO coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard, https://covid19.who.int/ (2020, accessed 28 November 2020).

Nicola

Alsafi

Sohrabi

, et al. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): a review. Int J Surg 2020; 78:185–193.

Chiancone

Fedelini

. Managing change in the urology department of a large hospital in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Urol 2020; 27(9): 820–822.

Ali

. Delay in OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic-perspectives from a virus hotspot. Headache 2020; 60(6): 1183–1186.

Yang

Shen

. Effect of COVID-19 epidemic on delay of diagnosis and treatment path for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:3859–3864.

Demirel

Adanur

. Epidemiology of urolithiasis. Turkiye Klinikleri J Urol-Special Topics 2009; 2(3): 1–5.

Kum

Mahmalji

Hale

, et al. Do stones still kill? An analysis of death from stone disease 1999–2013 in England and Wales. BJU Int 2016; 118(1): 140–144.

10.

Cepeda

Budía

Pérez-Fentes

, et al. Estrategias y recomendaciones para el tratamiento y seguimiento de la patología litiásica en el periodo de la pandemia COVID-19 (Strategies and recommendations for urolithiasis treatment and follow-up in COVID-19 pandemia). Arch Esp Urol 2020; 73(5): 438–446.

11.

Almeras

Denis

Meria

, et al. Recommandations du Comité Lithiase de l’Association Française d’Urologie pour la prise en charge des calculs urinaires durant la crise sanitaire liée à la pandémie à COVID-19 (Recommendations of the Urolithiasis Committee of the French Urology Association for the management and the treatment of the stone formers patients during the COVID-19 pandemic crisis). Prog Urol 2020; 30(8–9): 426–429.

12.

Ribal

Cornford

Briganti

, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines office rapid reaction group: an organisation-wide collaborative effort to adapt the European Association of Urology guidelines recommendations to the coronavirus disease 2019 era. Eur Urol 2020; 78(1): 21–28.

13.

McDermott

O’Kelly

Quinlan

, et al. A prospective study on the incidence of postponed time-sensitive urological procedures during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic due to patient preference. Ir J Med Sci 2021; 190:919–923.

14.

Flammia

Salciccia

Tufano

, et al. How urinary stone emergencies changed in the time of COVID-19? Urolithiasis 2020; 48(5): 467–469.

15.

Carrion

Mantica

Antón-Juanilla

M M

, et al. Assessment of trends and clinical presentation in the emergency department of patients with renal colic during the COVID-19 pandemic era. Actas Urol Esp 2020; 44(10): 653–658.

16.

Gul

Kaynar

Yildiz

, et al. The increased risk of complicated ureteral stones in the era of COVID-19 pandemic. J Endourol 2020; 34(8): 882–886.

17.

Dindo

Demartines

Clavien

. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240(2): 205–213.

18.

Faw

Wan

Hollingsworth

, et al. Impact of the timing of ureteral stent placement on outcomes in patients with obstructing ureteral calculi and presumed infection. J Endourol 2019; 33(9): 736–740.

19.

Ravintharan

Lim

Chng

. Ureterorenoscopy: factors influencing success. Singapore Med J 1991; 32(3): 151–153.

20.

Connor

Winkler

Miah

. COVID-19 pandemic – is virtual urology clinic the answer to keeping the cancer pathway moving? BJU Int 2020; 125(6): E3–E4.

21.

Ahmed

Hayat

Dasgupta

. Global challenges to urology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. BJU Int 2020; 125:E5–E6.

22.

Antonucci

Recupero

Marzio

, et al. The impact of COVID-19 outbreak on urolithiasis emergency department admissions, hospitalizations and clinical management in central Italy: a multicentric analysis. Actas Urol Esp 2020; 44(9): 611–616.

23.

Romantini

Saldutto

Maselli

, et al. Patient’s fear of being infected, another complication of COVID-19 outbreak: a lesson learned from a case of life-threatening urolithiasis. J Endourol Case Rep 2020; 6(4): 402–404.

24.

Oussalah

Gleye

Clerc Urmes

, et al. Long-term ACE inhibitor/ARB use is associated with severe renal dysfunction and acute kidney injury in patients with severe COVID-19: results from a referral center cohort in the northeast of France. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 71(9): 2447–2456.

25.

Preminger

Tiselius

Assimos

, et al. 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol 2007; 52:1610–1631.

26.

Wendt-Nordahl

Mut

Krombach

, et al. Do new generation flexible ureterorenoscopes offer a higher treatment success than their predecessors? Urol Res 2011; 39:185–188.

27.

Geraghty

Abourmarzouk

Rai

, et al. Evidence for ureterorenoscopy and laser fragmentation (URSL) for large renal stones in the modern era. Curr Urol Rep 2015; 16(8): 54.

28.

Kachroo

Wright

Sivalingam

. A tale of two eras: the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on stone disease presentations. Urology 2020; 144:270–272.