SammonJDAbdollahFChoueiriTKet al. Prostate-specific antigen screening after 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. JAMA2015; 314: 2077–2079.
3.
GosselaarCRoobolMJRoemelingSet al. The role of the digital rectal examination in subsequent screening visits in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam. Eur Urol2008; 54(3): 581–588.
4.
NajiLRandhawaHSohaniZet al. Digital rectal examination for prostate cancer screening in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Fam Med2018; 16(2): 149–154.
5.
NensiAChandeN.A survey of digital rectal examination training in Canadian medical schools. Can J Gastroenterol2012; 26(7): 441–444.
6.
CuiTKovellRCTerleckiRP.Is it time to abandon the digital rectal examination? Lessons from the PLCO cancer screening trial and peer-reviewed literature. Curr Med Res Opin2016; 4: 1–7.
7.
PorpigliaFManfrediMMeleFet al. Diagnostic pathway with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging versus standard pathway: results from a randomized prospective study in biopsy-naïve patients with suspected prostate cancer. Eur Urol2017; 72(2): 282–288.
8.
PahwaSSchiltzNKPonskyLEet al. Cost-effectiveness of MR imaging-guided strategies for detection of prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men. Radiology2017; 285(1): 157–166.
