Radical Prostatectomy: Which Quality of Life?

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate quality of life in patients submitted to radical prostatectomy, by correlating the results of the post-operative condition with follow-up data at 6 and 12 months.

Materials and Methods.

Between october 2004 and december 2005, 68 patients - mean age 68 (range 49–76) - treated with radical retropubic prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer (T2a, T2b, No, Mo) were consecutively enrolled onto the study. All patients underwent sexual as well as urinary incontinence rehabilitation, showing good compliance. We evaluated quality of life before prostatectomy (T0), 6 (T1) and 12 (T2) months after surgery through the Short Form 36 questionnaire, for which an analysis of variance for repeated measures was carried out. Patients were interviewed by our department psychologist regarding urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. All patients were disease-free at the time of evaluation.

Results.

No significant differences were observed between physical and mental health indices. Conversely, a significant improvement (p<0.001) was seen in all SF-36-questionnaire 8 scales, comparing preoperative T0 values with T1 and T2 values. Of the 68 patients, 53 (78%) no longer needed pads at the T2 follow-up, while 15 (22%) reported using 3–4 pads/day A significant worsening of the sexual function (maintenance of erection) was observed in 51 (75%) patients, who had reported having normal sexual activity preoperatively (T0). On the other hand, 17 (25%) patients reported having an adequate erection to engage in sexual intercourse.

Conclusions.

Despite the differences observed in physical and mental health scores during the three periods evaluated (T0, T1 and T2), overall quality of life does not appear to have been greatly compromised by surgery. At T2 follow-up, in fact, all 68 patients reported to be satisfied with having undergone radical prostatectomy because of its benefits in terms of survival and its limited effects on their quality of life. (Urologia 2007; 74: 22–9)