This study has examined a range of methods of studying the calcification process in bovine pericardial and polyurethane biomaterials. The calcification methods include static and dynamic, in vitro and in vivo tests. The analytical methods include measurement of depletion rates of calcium and phosphate from in vitro calcifying solutions, analysis of tissue contents of calcium, histological staining of tissue sections for calcium, X-ray elemental analysis, by scanning electron microscopy, of calcium and phosphorus distributions over valve leaflets calcified in vitro under dynamic conditions. Bovine pericardium, in all test settings, calcified to a much greater degree than polyurethane biomaterials. Polyurethane extracts calcified to a greater degree than bulk polyurethanes. The test protocol used allows progress through increasily demanding calcification tests, with the possibility of eliminating unsuitable materials with tests of limited complexity and expense.
RossD.N.. The evolution of the biologic valve. In: CohnL.H., GalluciV., eds. Cardiac bioprostheses.New York: Yorke Medical Books1982; 1–8.
2.
BlackM.M.. Artificial heart valves- past performance and future trends. Biomedical Polymers1988; 3: 1–4.
3.
SchoenF.J., CollinsJ.J., CohnL.H.. Long-term failure rate and morphologic correlations in porcine bioprosthetic heart valves. Am J Cardiol1983; 51: 957–64.
4.
ReulG.J., CooleyD.A., DuncanJ.M.Valve failure with the lonescu-Shiley bovine pericardial bioprosthesis: analysis of 2680 patients. J Vase Surg1985; 2: 192–204.
5.
NistalF., Garcfa-SatueE., ArtihanoE., DuranC.M.G., GalloI.. Comparative study of primary tissue failure between lonescu-Shiley pericardial and Hancock porcine valves in the aortic position. Am J Cardiol1986; 57: 161–4.
6.
BernaccaG.M.. Calcification in pericardial and polyurethane biomaterials used to fabricate prosthetic heart valve leaflets. Glasgow, UK: Strathclyde University1991; 2365 PhD thesis.
7.
BernaccaG.M., FisherA.C., MackayT.G., WheatleyD.J.. A dynamic in vitro method for studying bioprosthetic heart valve calcification. Materials in Medicine1992; 3(in press).
8.
HeraldM., LoH.B., RauG.The Helmholtz-Institute-trileaflet-polyurethane-heart valve prosthesis: design, manufacturing and first in vitro and in vivo results. In: PlanckH., SyreI., DaunerM., EgbersG., eds. Polyurethanes in biomedical engineering II.Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1987; 231–56.
9.
KolffW.J., YuL.S.. The return of elastomer valves. Ann Thorac Surg1989; 48: S98–9.
10.
NistalF., Garcia-MartinezV., ArbeE., FernandezD., MazorraF., GalloI.. In vivo experimental assessment of polytetrafluoroethylene trileaflet heart valve prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1990; 99: 1074–81.
11.
ThubrikarM.J., DeckJ.D., AouadD.V.M., NolanS.P.. Role of mechanical stress in calcification of aortic bioprosthetic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1983; 86: 115–25.
12.
HarasakiH., MoritzA., UchidaN.Initiation and growth of calcification on a polyurethane-coated blood pump. Trans ASAIO1987; 33: 643–9.
13.
BruckS.D.. Properties of biomaterials in the physiological environment.Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press Inc, 1980.
14.
HamonR.F., KhanA.S., ChowA.. The cation-chelation mechanism of metal-ion sorption by polyurethanes. Talanta1982; 29: 313–26.
15.
LongM.M., UrryD.W.. On the molecular mechanism of elastic fibre calcification. Trans ASAIO1981; 27: 690–6.
16.
AndersonH.C.. Normal and abnormal mineralization in mammals. Trans ASAIO1981; 27: 702–7.
17.
FisherL.W., TermineJ.D.. Non-collagenous proteins influencing the local mechanisms of calcification. Clin Orthop1985; 200: 362–85.
18.
LevyR.J., SchoenF.J., LevyJ.T., NelsonA.C., HowardS.L., OshryL.J.. Biologic determinants of dystrophic calcification and osteocalcin deposition in glutaraldehyde-preserved porcine aortic valve leaflets implanted subcu-taneously in rats. Am J Pathol1983; 113: 143–55.
19.
WuthierR.E., GoreS.T.. Partition of inorganic ions and phospholipids in isolated cell, membrane and matrix vesicle fractions: evidence for Ca-Pracidic phospholipid complexes. Calcif Tiss Res1977; 24: 163–71.
20.
SpytT.J., FisherJ., ReidJ., AndersonJ.D., WheatleyD.J.. Animal evaluation of a new pericardial bioprosthetic heart valve. Artif Organs1988; 12: 328–36.
21.
JonesM., EidboE.E., HilbertS.L., FerransV.J., ClarkR.E.. Anticalcification treatments of bioprosthetic heart valves: in vivo studies in sheep. J Card Surg1989; 4: 69–73.
22.
WoutersL.H.G., RousseauE.P.M., Van SteenhovenA.A., GermanA.L.. Development of artificial leaflets for heart valves prostheses. At: Polymers in medicine and surgery, the Plastics and Rubber Institute, Holland, 1986.
23.
GlasmacherB., ReulH., RauG., ErckesC., WielandJ.. In vitro investigation of the calcification behaviour of Polyurethane biomaterials. In: PlanckH., SyreI., DaunerM., EgbersG., eds. Polyurethanes in biochemical engineering II.Amsterdam: Elsevier Science1987; 151–67.
