Ten Gore-tex and ten Oreopoulos peritoneal catheters were evaluated in a comparative clinical trial with an average follow-up of 13 1/2 months per catheter. Catheter survival was significantly poorer in the Gore-tex group (p= 0.0016) because of catheter-related complications like tunnel infections, fissure, migration and painful catheter which made it necessary to remove seven Gore-tex catheters. Substantial corrections of the Gore-tex catheter design are proposed.
BoenS.T.Overview and history of peritoneal dialysis.Dial and Transplant1977; 6: 12–18.
2.
BayW.H., VaccaroP.S., PowellS.L.The Gore-tex peritoneal catheter: A clinical evaluation and comparison with the Tenckhoff catheter.Am J Kidney Dis1984; 4: 268–79.
3.
ShantiM.Gore-tex peritoneal catheter: clinical evaluation.Elkton, Maryland: WL Gore and Ass., Inc.1983.
4.
FrancisD.M.A., DonnellyP.K., VeitchP.S.Surgical aspects of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis - 3 years experience.Br J Surg, 1984; 71: 225–9.
5.
GloorH.J., NicholsW.K., SorkinM.I.Peritoneal access and related complications in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.Am J Med1983; 74: 593–8.
6.
DixonW.J., Chief Editor BMDP Statistical SoftwareUniversity of California Press, Life Table and Survival Functions, 557–75.
