JindalK.K., AriefM., GoldsteinM.B.Percent reduction in blood urea concentration during hemodialysis (PRU). A simple and accurate method to estimate Kt/V urea. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs1987; 33: 286–8.
4.
AebischerP., SchorderetD., JuilleratA., WautersJ.P., FellayG.Comparison of urea kinetics and direct dialysis quantification in hemodialysis patients. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs1985; 31: 338–42.
5.
EllisP.W., MalcheskyP.S., MagnussonM.O., GoormasticM., NakamotoS.Comparison of two methods of kinetic modeling. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs1984; 30: 60–4.
6.
SargentJ.A., GotchF.A.Principles and biophysics of dialysis. In: DrukkerW., ParsonsF.M., MaherJ.F., eds. Replacement of renal function by dialysis.Boston: Martinus Njhoff1983; 53–96.
7.
GotchF.A.The evaluation of dialysis adequacy. In: D'AmicoG., ColasantiG., eds. Contr Nephrol.Basel: Karger (in press).
8.
GoodkinD., RajaR.M., KramerM.S., GoldsteinS.J., MendezM.Inaccuracy of urea kinetic modelling based on estimated body weight and dialyzer clearances values. Am J Kidney Dis1988; 11: A8 (abstract).
9.
IlstrupK., HansonG., ShapiroW., KeshaviahP.Examining the foundations of urea kinetics. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs1985; 31: 164–8.
