Membrane and centrifugal apheresis operate on different physical principles but are both capable of efficiently fractionating plasma proteins from whole blood. For therapeutic purposes, both formats yield about the same protein clearance per liter of solute exchanged and neither is significantly more rapid than the other. Only continuous centrifugation can be used to pherese cellular elements and only membrane filter can be deployed in ‘spontaneous’ circuits. Hardware for continuous centrifugation is more expensive and disposables less expensive than for the membrane methods; the ‘crossover’ occurs at 200 treatments. To date, only the centrifugal method is employed for donor apheresis; this may change in the future as membranes can yield a truly platelet-free product and appear to offer a much more rapid collection cycle.
CastinoF., FriedmanL.I., SolomanB.A., ColtonC.K., LysaghtM.J.: The filtration of plasma from whole blood: a novel approach to clinical detoxification. In: Artificial Kidney. Artificial Liver, and Artificial Cells.ChangT.M.S. (ed.), Plenum Press, New York, 259, 1978.
5.
TuiCo, BartterF.C., WrightA.M., HoltR.B.: Red cell reinfusion and the frequency of plasma donations.J.A.M.A.,124, 331, 1944.
6.
FriedmanL.I., CastinoF., LysaghtM.J., SolomanB.A., SandersonJ.E., WiltbankT.B.: A continuous flow plasmapheresis system. Final Report, Nat. Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Contract No. 1HB-6-2928, 1979.
7.
GloecknerW.M., SieberthH.G.: Plasmafiltration, a new method of plasma exchange.Proc. Europ. Soc. Artif. Organs,5, 214, 1978.
8.
GurlandH.J., LysaghtM.J., SametlebenW., SchmidtB.: Comparative evaluation of filters used in membrane plasmapheresis.Nephron, 36, 346, 198.
9.
HedonE.: On the transmusion of pure red corpuscles in suspension in an artificial serum, after hemorrhages.Arch. Med. Exp.,14, 297, 1902.
10.
LysaghtM.J., ColtonC.K., CastinoF., FriedmanL., SandersonJ.E.: Development of a microporous membrane system for continuous flow plasmapheresis. Abstracts Amer.Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs,6, 51, 1977.
LysaghtM.J., SchmidtB., SamtlebenW., GurlandH.J.: Transport considerations in flat sheet microporous membrane plasmapheresis.Plasma Ther., (in press).
14.
NoseY., HoriuchiT., MalcheskyP.S., SmithJ.W., MatsaburaS., AbeY.: Therapeutic cryogel removal in autoimmune disease: What is cryogel? In: Therapeutic Plasmapheresis II.OdaT. (ed.), Schattauer., Stuttgart, 15, 1982.
15.
PourratJ.P., SanchezV., ConteJ.J., ManN.K.: Online plasma reprocessing by convective electropheresis. In: Plasma Separation and Plasma Fractionation: Current Status and Future Directions.LysaghtM.J., GurlandH.J. (eds.), S. Karger, Basel, 303, 1983.
16.
RandersonD.H.: Kinetics of continuous apheresis: a theoretical basis for the comparison of centrifugal and membrane systems. Plasma Ther.Transfus. Technol.,4, 199, 1983.
SamtlebenW., LysaghtM.J., SchmidtB., GurlandH.J.: A very simple technique for spontaneous membrane exchange without arterial access.J. Blood Purification,1, 90, 1983.
19.
SchmidtB., LysaghtM.J., SamtlebenW., GurlandH.J.: Plasmapheresis without pumps for therapeutic and donor purposes. In: Plasma Separation and Plasma Fractionation: Current Status and Future Directions.LysaghtM.J., GurlandH.J. (eds), S. Karger, Basel,188, 1983.
