The left ventricular assist device (LVAD) goes through a counterclockwise dynamic characteristic loop under heart-pump coupled working state. However, few studies have investigated the underlying physical mechanisms from the flow field perspective.
Method:
Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) methods are used for unsteady flow field simulations and hemolytic possibility predictions in one cardiac cycle. The pressure boundary conditions are set based on the prior in vitro experiment.
Results:
Flow blockage started at the inlet guide vanes (IGVs) and affected the downstream flow field at early systole, and occurred mainly at the outlet guide vanes (OGVs) during diastole. At a typical flow-rate, the residence time in IGVs accounted for 42.55% of all parts during systole whereas only 18.75% during diastole.
Conclusion:
The dynamic characteristic loop is closely related to the movement of vortices within the pump, as the low-speed vortices failing to respond in time to the changes in boundary conditions. An increased likelihood of adverse events is anticipated at early systole.
Significance:
This study reveals the physical mechanisms underlying the flow field changes within the pump during coupled working. The detailed hemolytic analysis at different cardiac events helps the subsequent real-time intelligent pump adjust strategies.
TravisARGiridharanGAPantalosGM, et al. Vascular pulsatility in patients with a pulsatile- or continuous-flow ventricular assist device. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2007; 133(2): 517–524.
2.
KonishiHAntakiJFAminDV, et al. Controller for an axial flow blood pump. Artif Organs1996; 20(5): 618–620.
3.
AkimotoTYamazakiKLitwakP, et al. Relationship of blood pressure and pump flow in an implantable centrifugal blood pump during hypertension. ASAIO J 200; 46(5): 596–599.
4.
StolińskiBMJRosenbaumCFlamengW.The heart-pump interaction: Effects of a microaxial blood pump. Int J Aritif Organs2002; 25(11): 1082–1088.
5.
ShuFVandenbergheSBrackettJ, et al. Classification of unsteady flow patterns in a rotodynamic blood pump: introduction of non-dimensional regime map. Cardiovasc Eng Technol2015; 6(3): 230–241.
6.
JahrenSEOchsnerGShuF, et al. Analysis of pressure head-flow loops of pulsatile rotodynamic blood pumps. Artif Organs2014; 38(4): 316–326.
7.
StanfieldJRSelzmanCH.In vitro pulsatility analysis of axial-flow and centrifugal-flow left ventricular assist devices. J Biomech Eng2013; 135(3): 1–6.
8.
MoscatoFDanieliGASchimaH.Dynamic modeling and identification of an axial flow ventricular assist device. Int J Artif Organs2009; 32(6): 336–343.
9.
YokoyamaYKawaguchiOKitaoT, et al. Prediction of the external work of the native heart from the dynamic H-Q curves of the rotary blood pumps during left heart bypass. Artif Organs2010; 34(9): 766–777.
10.
BoësSThamsenBHaasM, et al. Hydraulic characterization of implantable rotary blood pumps. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng2019; 66(6): 1618–1927.
11.
LiSJinDGuiX.Dynamic characteristic modeling of left ventricular assist devices based on hysteresis effects. Comput Biol Med2023; 157: 106737.
12.
LiSJinDGuiX, et al. Numerical analysis of different cardiac functions and support modes on blood damage potential in an axial pump. Int J Artif Organs2023; 46(4): 215–225.
13.
WangSTanJYuZ, et al. Shear stress and hemolysis analysis of blood pump under constant and pulsation speed based on a multiscale coupling model. Math Probl Eng2020; 2020: 8341827.
14.
MartinezJSmegnerKTomodaM, et al. Encouraging regular aortic valve opening for EVAHEART 2 LVAD support using virtual patient hemodynamic speed modulation analysis. ASAIO J2024; 70(3): 207–216.
15.
GreitzerEMMooreFK.A theory of post-stall transients in axial compression systems: Part I—development of equations. J Eng Gas Turbines Power1986; 108(2): 68–76.
16.
GreitzerEMMooreFK.A theory of post-stall transients in axial compression systems: Part II—application. J Eng Gas Turbines Power1986; 108(2): 231–239.
17.
Al-KhomairiAM.Use of steady-state pump head-discharge curve for unsteady pipe flow applications. J Hydraul Eng2003; 129(12): 1001–1006.
18.
WuDWuPLiZ, et al. The transient flow in a centrifugal pump during the discharge valve rapid opening process. Nucl Eng Des2010; 240(12): 4061–4068.
19.
YangSChenXWuD, et al. Dynamic analysis of the pump system based on MOC-CFD coupled method. Ann Nucl Energy2015; 78: 60–69.
20.
ChenZJenaSKGiridharanGA, et al. Shear stress and blood trauma under constant and pulse-modulated speed CF-VAD operations: CFD analysis of the HVAD. Med Biol Eng Comput2018; 57(4): 807–818.
21.
FraserKHZhangTTaskinME, et al. A quantitative comparison of mechanical blood damage parameters in rotary ventricular assist devices: shear stress, exposure time and hemolysis index. J Biomech Eng2012; 134(8): 1–11.
22.
OnderAIncebayOSenMA, et al. Heuristic optimization of impeller sidewall gaps-based on the bees algorithm for a centrifugal blood pump by CFD. Int J Artif Organs2021; 44(10): 765–772.
23.
ArvandAHormesMReulH.A validated computational fluid dynamics model to estimate hemolysis in a rotary blood pump. Artif Organs2005; 29(7): 531–540.
24.
ZhangJZhangPFraserKH, et al. Comparison and experimental validation of fluid dynamic numerical models for a clinical ventricular assist device. Artif Organs2013; 37(4): 380–389.
25.
DaiWFWuPLiuGM.A two-phase flow approach for modeling blood stasis and estimating the thrombosis potential of a ventricular assist device. Int J Artif Organs2021; 44(7): 471–480.
26.
LiYYuJWangH, et al. Investigation of the influence of blade configuration on the hemodynamic performance and blood damage of the centrifugal blood pump. Artif Organs2022; 46(9): 1817–1832.
27.
BoraschiABozziSThamsenB, et al. Thrombotic risk of rotor speed modulation regimes of contemporary centrifugal continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. ASAIO J2021; 67(7): 737–745.
28.
WangMXuHJinD, et al. Unsteady character and flow fields in an axial blood pump under pulsatile pressure boundary condition. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng2018; 408: 012014.
29.
WiegmannLThamsenBDe ZélicourtD, et al. Fluid dynamics in the HeartMate 3: Influence of the artificial pulse feature and residual cardiac pulsation. Artif Organs2019; 43(4): 363–376.
30.
TaskinMEFraserKHZhangT, et al. Computational characterization of flow and hemolytic performance of the UltraMag blood pump for circulatory support. Artif Organs2010; 34(12): 1099–1113.
31.
ZhangJChenZGriffithBP, et al. Computational characterization of flow and blood damage potential of the new maglev CH-VAD pump versus the HVAD and HeartMate II pumps. Int J Artif Organs2020; 43(10): 653–662.
32.
LiSJinDGuiX, et al. Influence of heart rate on dynamic characteristics and hemolytic potential: a study using in-vitro and numerical methods. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng2025; 72(2): 689–704.
33.
LiuGMJinDHZhouJY, et al. Design and numerical evaluation of an axial partial-assist blood pump for Chinese and other heart failure patients. Int J Artif Organs2017; 40(9): 489–497.
34.
LiuGMJinDHZhouJY, et al. Numerical investigation of the influence of blade radial gap flow on axial blood pump performance. ASAIO J2019; 65(1): 59–69.
35.
PuentenerPSchuckMKolarJW.CFD assisted evaluation of in vitro experiments on bearingless blood pumps. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng2021; 68(4): 1370–1378.
36.
LiuGMChenHBHouJF, et al. Platelet adhesion emulation: a novel method for estimating the device thrombosis potential of a ventricular assist device. Int J Artif Organs2020; 43(4): 252–257.
37.
GiersiepenMWurzingerLJOpitzR, et al. Estimation of shear stress-related blood damage in heart valve prostheses - in vitro comparison of 25 aortic valves. Int J Artif Organs1990; 13(5): 300–306.
38.
HeuserGOpitzR. A Couette viscometer for short time shearing of blood. Biorheology1980; 17: 17–24.
39.
BludszuweitC.Three-dimensional numerical prediction of stress loading of blood particles in a centrifugal pump. Artif Organs1995; 19(7): 590–596.
40.
TaskinMEFraserKHZhangT, et al. Evaluation of Eulerian and Lagrangian models for hemolysis estimation. ASAIO J2012; 58(4): 363–372.
KanCDChenWLLinCH, et al. Optimal flow adjustment of veno-venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with an adaptive prediction model: Cannula sizes screening and pump speeds estimation. IET Sci Meas Technol2016; 10(3): 177–184.
43.
KanCDWangJNLinCH, et al. Handmade trileaflet valve design and validation for patch-valved conduit reconstruction using generalized regression machine learning model. Technol Heal Care2018; 26(4): 605–620.
44.
ChenWLLinCHWangJN, et al. Assistive technology using regurgitation fraction and fractional-order integration to assess pulmonary valve insufficiency for pre-surgery decision making and post-surgery outcome evaluation. Biomed Signal Process Control2018; 44: 247–257.
45.
ShuFVandenbergheSAntakiJF.The importance of dQ/dt on the flow field in a turbodynamic pump with pulsatile flow. Artif Organs2009; 33(9): 757–762.
46.
VincentFRauchALoobuyckV, et al. Arterial pulsatility and circulating von willebrand factor in patients on mechanical circulatory support. J Am Coll Cardiol2018; 71(19): 2106–2118.
47.
LescroartMHébertJLVincentF, et al. Pulsatility in ventricular assistance devices: a translational review focused on applied haemodynamics. Arch Cardiovasc Dis2020; 113(6–7): 461–472.
48.
LiaoSWuELNeidlinM, et al. The influence of rotary blood pump speed modulation on the risk of intraventricular thrombosis. Artif Organs2018; 42(10): 943–953.
