This article describes three cases in which a dislocated hip prosthesis was reduced by a new reduction technique – that we previously described – using traction table. The dissociation of a prosthesis is a rare but serious complication of closed reduction manoeuvre. The new reduction manoeuvre using a traction table may be a good option to avoid dissociation of the prosthesis during closed reduction for treatment of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty.
BouchetRMercierNSaragagliaD.Posterior approach and dislocation rate: a 213 total hip replacements case-control study comparing the dual mobility cup with a conventional 28-mm metal head/polyethylene prosthesis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2011; 97(1): 2–7.
2.
JonkerRCvan BeersLWAHvan der WalBCH, et al. Can dual mobility cups prevent dislocation without increasing revision rates in primary total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2020; 106(3): 509–517.
3.
HutenDFournierYGicquelT, et al. Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty with a dual-mobility cup. Matched case-control study (16 cases vs. 48 controls). Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2019; 105(7): 1303–1309.
4.
MartinotPBlaironAPutmanS, et al. Course of dislocated posterior hip arthroplasty: a continuous 232-patient series at a mean 10 years’ follow up (range, 1–22 years). Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2018; 104(3): 325–331.
5.
FessyMHPutmanSVisteA, et al. What are the risk factors for dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty? A multicenter case-control study of 128 unstable and 438 stable hips. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2017; 103(5): 663–668.
6.
ReinaNPutmanSDesmarchelierR, et al. Can a target zone safer than Lewinnek’s safe zone be defined to prevent instability of total hip arthroplasties? Case-control study of 56 dislocated THA and 93 matched controls. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2017; 103(5): 657–661.
7.
SimianEChatellardRDruonJ, et al. Dual mobility cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: dislocation rate and survival after 5 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2015; 101(5): 577–581.
8.
CharissouxJLAsloumYMarcheixPS.Surgical management of recurrent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2014; 100(1 Suppl): S25–S34.
9.
GibonEScemamaCDavidB, et al. Oxinium femoral head damage generated by a metallic foreign body within the polyethylene cup following recurrent dislocation episodes. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2013; 99(7): 865–869.
10.
GirardJKernGMigaudH, et al.; Société française de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique. Primary total hip arthroplasty revision due to dislocation: prospective French multicenter study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2013; 99(5): 549–553.
11.
ChuCMWangSJLinLC.Dissociation of modular total hip arthroplasty at the femoral head-neck interface after loosening of the acetabular shell following hip dislocation. J Arthroplasty2001; 16(6): 806–809.
ShigemuraTMiuraMMurataY, et al. A new closed reduction technique using a traction table to treat a traumatic posterior dislocation of the hip joint. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2020; 106(5): 881–884.
14.
StarMJColwellCWJrDonaldsonWFIII, et al. Dissociation of modular hip arthroplasty components after dislocation. A report of three cases at differing dissociation levels. Clin Orthop Relat Res1992; 278: 111–115.
