Impact of setup orientation on blend electrospinning of poly-ε-caprolactone-gelatin scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering

Abstract

Introduction:

This article explores the effect of horizontal and vertical setups on blend electrospinning with two polymers having vastly different properties – poly-ε-caprolactone and gelatin, and subsequent effect of the resulting microstructure on viability of seeded cells.

Methods:

Poly-ε-caprolactone and gelatin of varying blend concentrations were electrospun in horizontal and vertical setup orientations. NIH 3T3 fibroblasts were seeded on these scaffolds to assess cell viability changes in accordance with change in microstructure.

Results:

Blend electrospinning yielded a heterogeneous microstructure in the vertical orientation beyond a critical concentration of gelatin, and a homogeneous microstructure in the horizontal orientation. Unblended poly-ε-caprolactone electrospinning showed no significant difference in fibre diameter or pore size in either orientation. Mechanical testing showed reduced elasticity when poly-ε-caprolactone is blended with gelatin but an overall increase in tensile strength in the vertically spun samples. Cells on vertically spun samples showed significantly higher viabilities by day 7.

Discussion:

The composite microstructure obtained in vertically spun poly-ε-caprolactone -gelatin blends has a positive effect on viability of seeded cells. Such scaffolds can be considered suitable candidates for cardiovascular tissue engineering where cell infiltration is crucial.

Keywords

Biocompatibility fibre diameter infiltration polymer blends pore size vascular graft

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

World Health Organization. Cardiovascular disease, http://www.who.int/cardiovascular_diseases/en/ (accessed 23 November 2017).

Diehm

Allenberg

J-R

Nimura-Eckert

et al . Color atlas of vascular diseases. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2000.

Robbins

Kumar

. Robbins basic pathology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier, 2007.

Harskamp

Lopes

Baisden

et al . Saphenous vein graft failure after coronary artery bypass surgery: pathophysiology, management, and future directions. Ann Surg 2013; 257(5): 824–833.

Klinkert

Post

Breslau

et al . Saphenous vein versus PTFE for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass. A review of the literature. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004; 27(4): 357–362.

Wong

Griffiths

. Immunogenicity in xenogeneic scaffold generation: antigen removal versus decellularization. Acta Biomater 2014; 10(5): 1806–1816.

Pashneh-Tala

MacNeil

Claeyssens

. The tissue-engineered vascular graft – past, present, and future. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2016; 22(1): 68–100.

Pfeiffer

Stefanitsch

Wankhammer

et al . Endothelialization of electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL) small caliber vascular grafts spun from different polymer blends. J Biomed Mater Res A 2014; 102(12): 4500–4509.

Bhardwaj

Kundu

. Electrospinning: a fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnol Adv 2010; 28(3): 325–347.

10.

Sell

Wolfe

Garg

et al . The use of natural polymers in tissue engineering: a focus on electrospun extracellular matrix analogues. Polymers 2010; 2(4): 522–553.

11.

Pham

Sharma

Mikos

. Electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone) microfiber and multilayer nanofiber/microfiber scaffolds: characterization of scaffolds and measurement of cellular infiltration. Biomacromolecules 2006; 7(10): 2796–2805.

12.

Baker

Gee

Metter

et al . The potential to improve cell infiltration in composite fiber-aligned electrospun scaffolds by the selective removal of sacrificial fibres. Biomaterials 2008; 29(15): 2348–2358.

13.

Whited

Whitney

Hofmann

et al . Pre-osteoblast infiltration and differentiation in highly porous apatite-coated PLLA electrospun scaffold. Biomaterials 2011; 32(9): 2294–2304.

14.

Zhang

Ouyang

Lim

et al . Electrospinning of gelatin fibers and gelatin/PCL composite fibrous scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005; 72(1): 156–165.

15.

Hwang

PTJ

Murdock

Alexander

et al . Poly(ε-caprolactone)/gelatin composite electrospun scaffolds with porous crater-like structures for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A 2016; 104(4): 1017–1029.

16.

Jiang

Carlson

Teusink

et al . Expanding two-dimensional electrospun nanofiber membranes in the third dimension by a modified gas-foaming technique. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2015; 1(10): 991–1001.

17.

Nam

Huang

Agarwal

et al . Improved cellular infiltration in electrospun fiber via engineered porosity. Tissue Eng 2007; 13(9): 2249–2257.

18.

Stankus

Guan

Fujimoto

et al . Microintegrating smooth muscle cells into a biodegradable, elastomeric fiber matrix. Biomaterials 2006; 27(5): 735–744.

19.

Park

Kim

et al . Development of 3-D nanofibrous fibroin scaffold with high porosity by electrospinning: implications for bone regeneration. Biotechnol Lett 2008; 30(3): 405–410.

20.

Leong

Chan

Chian

. Cryogenic electrospinning: proposed mechanism, process parameters and its use in engineering of bilayered tissue structures. Nanomedicine 2013; 8(4): 555–566.

21.

O’Brien

. Biomaterials and scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Today 2011; 14(3): 88–95.

22.

Nava

Draghi

Giordano

et al . The effect of scaffold pore size in cartilage tissue engineering. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2016; 14(3): e223–e229.

23.

Loh

Choong

. Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2013; 19(6): 485–502.

24.

Murphy

Haugh

O’Brien

. The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen–glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2010; 31(3): 461–466.

25.

O’Brien

Harley

Yannas

et al . The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials 2005; 26(4): 433–441.

26.

Karageorgiou

Kaplan

. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 5474–5491.

27.

Chakraborty

Liao

Adler

et al . Electrohydrodynamics: a facile technique to fabricate drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2009; 61(12): 1043–1054.

28.

Yang

Jia

et al . Comparisons of fibers properties between vertical and horizontal type electrospinning systems. In: Conference on electrical insulation and dielectric phenomena (CEIDP), Virginia Beach, VA, 18–21 October 2009, pp. 204–207. New York: IEEE.

29.

Rodoplu

Mutlu

. Effects of electrospinning setup and process parameters on nanofiber morphology intended for the modification of quartz crystal microbalance surfaces. J Eng Fiber Fabr 2012; 7(2): 118–123.

30.

Liu

de Bruyn

et al . Optimization of the electrospinning process for core–shell fiber preparation. J Biomater Tiss Eng 2014; 4(11): 973–980.

31.

Azimi

Nourpanah

Rabiee

et al . Poly (ε-caprolactone) fiber: an overview. J Eng Fiber Fabr 2014; 9(3): 74–90.

32.

Woodruff

Hutmacher

. The return of a forgotten polymer – polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog Polym Sci 2010; 35(10): 1217–1256.

33.

W-J

Shanti

Tuan

. Electrospinning technology for nanofibrous scaffolds in tissue engineering. In: Kumar

(ed.) Nanotechnologies for the life sciences Volume 9: tissue, cell and organ engineering. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2006, pp. 135–187.

34.

Feng

Yuan

et al . Acetic-acid-mediated miscibility toward electrospinning homogeneous composite nanofibers of GT/PCL. Biomacromolecules 2012; 13(12): 3917–3925.

35.

Gautam

Dinda

Mishra

. Fabrication and characterization of PCL/gelatin composite nanofibrous scaffold for tissue engineering applications by electrospinning method. Mater Sci Eng C 2013; 33(3): 1228–1235.

36.

Feng

Duan

et al . Effect of inhomogeneity of the electrospun fibrous scaffolds of gelatin/polycaprolactone hybrid on cell proliferation. J Biomed Mater Res A 2015; 103(2): 431–438.

37.

Sant

Hwang

Lee

et al . Hybrid PGS-PCL microfibrous scaffolds with improved mechanical and biological properties. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2011; 5(4): 283–291.

38.

Panda

Bissoyi

Pramanik

et al . Development of novel electrospun nanofibrous scaffold from P. ricini and A. mylitta silk fibroin blend with improved surface and biological properties. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2015; 48: 521–532.

39.

Kim

Ryu

et al . Effect of fiber diameter on surface morphology, mechanical property, and cell behavior of electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone) mat. Fiber Polym 2016; 17(7): 1033–1042.

40.

Raghavan

Coffin

. Control of inter-fiber fusing for nanofiber webs via electrospinning. J Eng Fiber Fabr 2011; 6(4): 1–5.

41.

Argento

. Biomechanical design of an electrospun scaffold for in situ cardiovascular tissue engineering. PhD Thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven, 2014.

42.

Kancheva

Toncheva

Manolova

et al . Enhancing the mechanical properties of electrospun polyester mats by heat treatment. Express Polym Lett 2015; 9(1): 49–65.

43.

Asti

Gioglio

. Natural and synthetic biodegradable polymers: different scaffolds for cell expansion and tissue formation. Int J Artif Organs 2014; 37(3): 187–205.

44.

Ghasemi-Mobarakeh

Prabhakaran

Morshed

et al . Electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone)/gelatin nanofibrous scaffolds for nerve tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2008; 29(34): 4532–4539.

45.

Chaudhari

Vig

Baganizi

et al . Future prospects for scaffolding methods and biomaterials in skin tissue engineering: a review. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17(12): E1974.

46.

Karimi

Navidbakhsh

Shojaei

et al . Measurement of the uniaxial mechanical properties of healthy and atherosclerotic human coronary arteries. Mater Sci Eng C 2013; 33(5): 2550–2554.

47.

Gorgieva

Kokol

. Collagen-vs. gelatine-based biomaterials | their biocompatibility: review and perspectives. In: Pignatello

(ed.) Biomaterials applications for nanomedicine. Rijeka: InTech, 2011, pp. 17–52.

48.

Ulery

Nair

Laurencin

. Biomedical applications of biodegradable polymers. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 2011; 49(12): 832–864.