On-Pump vs. Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery at a Non-Academic Community Hospital: Have Biocompatibility Improvements Eliminated the Superiority of Off-Pump Surgery?

Abstract

Objectives

Standard coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery involves cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) but given concerns over neurological and inflammatory complications related to CPB, many patients receive so-called off-pump procedures (OPCABG). Our objective is to determine if the recent improvements in the biocompatibility of CPB circuitry have improved post-operative outcomes at the community hospital level, particularly in terms of hospital length of stay (LOS), stroke and post-operative infection.

Methods

We analyzed hospital LOS, incidence of stroke, infection, and mortality along with several clinical variables in 209 patients (38% underwent OPCABG) at a single, non-academic community hospital. We constructed a series of forward, stepwise, multiple-variable regression models using mediastinal infection, hospital LOS, and stroke as dependant variables.

Results

OPCABG was associated with a shorter median hospital LOS (3 days vs. 4 days; p=0.0001) and a reduced occurrence of stroke (0% vs. 7.6%; p=0.03). However, mediastinal infections occurred more commonly in OPCABG cases (10% vs. 2.2%; p=0.02). CABG and pre-existing renal disease were predictors of increased hospital LOS (p< 0.0001) whereas CABG was the only factor associated with decreased risk of mediastinal infection (OR=0.21 (0.05–0.80); p=0.02).

Conclusions

At the community level, OPCABG appears to be superior in terms of LOS and incidence of stroke. Paradoxically, CABG surgery demonstrates a reduced rate of mediastinal infection. (Int J Artif Organs 2007; 30: 338–44)