Sequential Convective Therapies (SCT): A Prospective Study on Feasibility,Safety,Adequacy and Tolerance of On-Line Hemofiltration and Hemodiafiltration in Sequence

Abstract

Sequential dialysis techniques (i.e pure ultrafiltration followed by dialysis) have been used in the past, due to their capability to remove large volumes of fluids without inducing hemodynamic instability. The disadvantages of inadequate efficiency and lack of technology lead to the decline of such methods. Hemofiltration (HF) and hemodiafiltration (HDF) are recently being utilized in a greater proportion thanks to on-line fluid preparation systems. Each process (HF and HDF) has its own benefits in the removal of small, medium and high-molecular weight substances and in hemodynamic stability. Sequential convective therapies (SCT) such as hemofiltration-hemodiafiltration in sequence (HF-HDF) may combine the benefits and eliminate the disadvantages of each method and should be studied in order to explore their potential application in modern dialysis. Furthermore they can be easily applied nowadays, due to the development of new sophisticated dialysis machines. In order to evaluate the feasibility, safety, efficiency and tolerance of different SCT methods we studied 3 schedules: SCT1: 1h pre-dilution HF followed by 3h of postdilution HDF (in the HF mode we lost 25% of the total fluid that had to be removed). SCT2: 1h pre-dilution HF followed by 3h of post-dilution HDF (in the HF mode we lost 50% of the total fluid that had to be removed). SCT3: 2h pre-dilution HF followed by 2h of post-dilution HDF (in the HF mode we lost 50% of the total fluid that had to be removed). We studied 6 chronic hemodialysis patients using the same machine (AK200 ULTRA), with on-line fluid preparation system and the same type of dialyzer (Polyflux 210). SCT schedules were compared to on-line HF, on-line HDF and high flux dialysis performed with the same dialyzers.

The treatments resulted safe, easy, feasible and well tolerated with an improved hemodynamic response to high volume convective therapies. Adequacy of treatment was satisfactory in all SCT schedules while middle molecular weight solute clearance and removal resulted higher in treatments with higher convective component.

SCT might represent an interesting option for the future especially in patients with hemodynamic instability and requirements for interventions during treatment.