MaduellF., NavarroV., CruzM.C.. Osteocalcin and myoglobin removal in on-line hemodiafiltration versus low-and high-flux hemodialysis.Am J Kidney Dis2002; 40: 582–9.
2.
SamtlebenW., DenglerC., ReinhardtB.. Comparision of the new polyethersulfone high-flux membrane Diapes® HF800 with conventional high-flux membranes during on-line haemodiafiltration.Nephrol Dial Transplant2003; 18: 2382–6.
3.
WardR., SchmidtB., HullinJ.. A comparision of on-line hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis: A prospective clinical study.J Am Soc Nephrol2000; 11: 2344–50.
4.
MineshimaM., IshimoriI., IshidaK.. Effects of internal filtration on the solute removal efficiency of a dialyzer.ASAIO J2000; 46: 456–60.
5.
RoncoC.. Backfiltration: A controversial issue in modern dialysis.Int J Artif Organs1988; 11: 69–74.
6.
RoncoC., BrendolanA., FerianiM.. A new scintigraphic method to characterize ultrafiltration in hollow fiber dialyzersKidney Int1992; 41: 1383–93.
7.
RoncoC., OrlandiniG., BrendolanA.. Enhancement of convective transport by internal filtration in a modified experimental hemodalyzer.Kidney Int1998; 54: 979–85.
8.
RoncoC., BrendolanA., LupiA.. Effect of a reduced inner diameter of hollow fibers in hemodialyzers.Kidney Int2000; 58: 809–17.
9.
BirdR.B., StewartW.E., LightfootE.N.. Transport phenomena.J Wiley & Sons, New York, 1960.