Abstract
Clearance of low (LMW) and middle molecular weight (MMW) solutes was investigated in vitro for different dialyzer configurations and mutual flow directions. Single pass tests were performed with two low flux Fresenius F6HPS hemodialyzers placed in series (12 tests) and in parallel (6 tests), and results were compared with those for one single dialyzer (2 tests). Either high concentrated (45mS/cm) bicarbonate dialysis fluid (surrogate LMW) or trisodiumphosphate (surrogate MMW) concentration (31mS/cm) was used as blood substitution fluid. Standard blood and dialysate flows of 250 and 500ml/min, respectively, were prescribed. Clearance was derived from conductivity measurements in blood and dialysate compartment, correcting for the overall ultrafiltration rate of 0.1–0.5l/h. In a single dialyzer, changing the counter current flow to co-current deteriorates diffusive clearance by 14% (LMW) and 18% (MMW). Compared to one single dialyzer using counter current flow, clearance increases by 3 to 8% (LMW) and by 15 to 18% (MMW) using two dialyzers in parallel and in series, respectively. As a consequence, the benefit by using a second dialyzer is more prominent for larger molecules. Moreover, pressure profiles drawn for the different configurations show the impact of limited convection on diffusive clearance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.