FentonS.S., SchaubelD.E., DesmeulesM., MorrisonH.I., MooY., CoplestonP., JefferyJ.R., KjellstrandC.M.Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: A comparison of adjusted mortality rates. Am J Kidney Dis1997; 30: 334–42.
7.
GokalR.Peritoneal dialysis in the 21st century: An analysis of current problems and future developments. J Am Soc Nephrol2002; 13(suppl 1): S104–16.
8.
LysaghtM.J., VoneshE.F., GotchF., IbelsL., KeenM., LindholmB., NolphK.D., PollockC.A., ProwantB., FarrellP.C.The influence of dialysis treatment modality on the decline of remaining renal function. ASAIO Trans1991; 37: 598–604.
9.
MoistL.M., PortF.K., OrzolS.M., YoungE.W., OstbyeT., WolfeR.A., Hulbert-ShearonT., JonesC.A., BloembergenW.E.Predictors of loss of residual renal function among new dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol2000; 11: 556–64.
10.
McKaneW., ChandnaS.M., TattersallJ.E., GreenwoodR.N., FarringtonK.Identical decline of residual renal function in high-flux biocompatible hemodialysis and CAPD. Kidney Int2002; 61: 256–65.
11.
BargmanJ.M., ThorpeK.E., ChurchillDN; CANUSA Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. Relative contribution of residual renal function and peritoneal clearance to adequacy of dialysis: A reanalysis of the CANUSA study. J Am Soc Nephrol2001; 12: 2158–62.
12.
TermorshuizenF., KorevaarJ.C., DekkerF.W., van ManenJ.G., BoeschotenE.W., KredietRT; NECOSAD Study Group. The relative importance of residual renal function compared with peritoneal clearance for patient survival and quality of life: an analysis of the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD)-2. Am J Kidney Dis2003; 41: 1293–302.
13.
WangA.Y., SeaM.M., IpR., LawM.C., ChowK.M., LuiS.F., LiP.K., WooJ.Independent effects of residual renal function and dialysis adequacy on actual dietary protein, calorie, and other nutrient intake in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol2001; 12: 2450–7.
14.
MenonM.K., NaimarkD.M., BargmanJ.M., VasS.I., OreopoulosD.G.Long-term blood pressure control in a cohort of peritoneal dialysis patients and its association with residual renal function. Nephrol Dial Transplant2001; 16: 2207–13.
15.
BammensB., EvenepoelP., VerbekeK., VanrenterghemY.Removal of middle molecules and protein-bound solutes by peritoneal dialysis and relation with uremic symptoms. Kidney Int2003; 64: 2238–43.
16.
LiP.K., ChowK.M., WongT.Y., LeungC.B., SzetoC.C.Effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor on residual renal function in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. A randomized, controlled study. Ann Intern Med2003 15; 139: 105–12.
17.
SennfaltK., MagnussonM., CarlssonP.Comparison of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis a cost-utility analysis. Perit Dial Int2002; 22: 39–47.
18.
GoreeR., ManalichJ., GrootendorstP., BeecroftM.L., ChurchillD.N.Cost analysis of dialysis treatments for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Clin Invest Med1995; 18: 455–64.
19.
XueJ.L., MaJ.Z., LouisT.A., CollinsA.J.Forecast of the number of patients with end-stage renal disease in the United States to the year 2010. J Am Soc Nephrol2001; 12: 2753–8.
20.
LysaghtM.J.Maintenance dialysis population dynamics: current trends and long-term implications. J Am Soc Nephrol2002; 13(suppl 1): S37–40.
21.
ApostolouT., GokalR.Quality of life after peritoneal dialysis. In: GokalR., KhannaR., KredietR., NolphK., eds. Text book of peritoneal dialysis.Klewer Academic Press, 2000; pp 709–735.
22.
JuliusM., KneisleyJ.D., Carpentier-AltingP., HawthorneV.M., WolfeR.A., PortF.K.A comparison of employment rates of patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis vs in-center hemodialysis (Michigan End-Stage Renal Disease Study). Arch Intern Med1989; 149: 839–42.
23.
BleyerA.J., RussellG.B., SatkoS.G.Sudden and cardiac death rates in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int1999; 55: 1553–9.
24.
CollinsA.J., HaoW., XiaH., EbbenJ.P., EversonS.E., ConstantiniE.G., MaJ.Z.Mortality risks of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis1999; 34: 1065–74.
25.
HouseA.A., PhamB., PageD.E.Transfusion and recombinant human erythropoietin requirements differ between dialysis modalities. Nephrol Dial Transplant1998; 13: 1763–9.
26.
SelgasR., Martinez-ZapicoR., BajoM.A., RomeroJ.R., MunozJ., RinonC., MirandaB., MiguelJ.L.Prevalence of hepatitis C antibodies (HCV) in a dialysis population at one center. Perit Dial Int1992; 12: 28–30.
27.
Cendoroglo NetoM., DraibeS.A., SilvaA.E., FerrazM.L., GranatoC., PereiraC.A., SessoR.C., GasparA.M., AjzenH.Incidence of and risk factors for hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection among haemodialysis and CAPD patients: evidence for environmental transmission. Nephrol Dial Transplant1995; 10: 240–6.
28.
AbbottK.C., AgodoaL.Y.Etiology of bacterial septicemia in chronic dialysis patients in the United States. Clin Nephrol2001; 56: 124–31.
29.
Van BiensenW., VanholderR., Van LooA., Van der VennetM., LameireN.Peritoneal dialysis favorably influences early graft function after renal transplantation compared to haemodialysis. Transplantation2000; 69: 508–14.
30.
Van BiesenW., DequidtC., VijtD., VanholderR., LameireN.Analysis of the reasons for transfers between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis and their effect on survivals. Adv Perit Dial1998; 14: 90–4.
31.
MaitraS., BurkartJ., FineA., PrichardS., BernardiniJ., JindalK.K., OreopoulosD.G.Patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis for ten years or more in North America. Perit Dial Int2000; 20(suppl 2): S127–33.
32.
Van BiesenW., VanholderR.C., VeysN., DhondtA., LameireN.H.An evaluation of an integrative care approach for end-stage renal disease patients. J Am Soc Nephrol2000; 11: 116–25.
33.
ThodisE., BhaskaranS., PasadakisP., BargmanJ.M., VasS.I., OreopoulosD.G.Decrease in Staphylococcus aureus exit-site infections and peritonitis in CAPD patients by local application of mupirocin ointment at the catheter exit site. Perit Dial Int1998; 18: 261–70.
34.
NakamotoH., KawaguchiY., SuzukiH.Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Japan. Adv Perit Dial2002; 18: 119–23.
35.
TeehanB.P., ScheiflerC.R., SiglerM.H., GilgoreG.S.A quantitative approach to the CAPD prescription. Perit Dial Bull1985; 5: 152–6.
36.
MaiorcaR., BrunoriG., ZubaniR., CancariniG.C., ManiliL., CameriniC., MovilliE., PolaA., d'AvolioG., GelattiU.Predictive value of dialysis adequacy and nutritional indices for mortality and morbidity in CAPD and HD patients. A longitudinal study. Nephrol Dial Transplant1995; 10: 2295–305.
37.
Adequacy of dialysis and nutrition in continuous peritoneal dialysis: association with clinical outcomes.Canada-USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. J Am Soc Nephrol1996; 7: 198–207.
38.
PaniaguaR., AmatoD., VoneshE., Correa-RotterR., RamosA., MoranJ., MujaisS; Mexican Nephrology Collaborative Study Group. Effects of increased peritoneal clearances on mortality rates in peritoneal dialysis: ADEMEX, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Am Soc Nephrol2002; 13: 1307–20.
39.
OreopoulosD.G.Beyond Kt/V: Redefining adequacy of dialysis in the 21st century. Int Urol Nephrol2002; 34: 393–403.
40.
LiakopoulosV., KrishnanM., SavajS., KhandelwalM., GhareebS., MussoC., VasS., BargmanJ.M., JassalS.V., OreopoulosD.G.Improvement of uremic symptoms in stable PD patients after increasing dialysis dose. Present at the 17th World Congress of Nephrology, 8-12 June 2003, Berlin, Germany. Nephrol Dial Transplant2003; 18(suppl 4): S476.
41.
KoningsC.J., KoomanJ.P., SchonckM.Fluid status, blood pressure, and cardiovascular abnormalities in patients on peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int2002; 22: 477–87.
42.
AtesK., NergizogluG., KevenK.Effect of fluid and sodium removal on mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int2001; 60: 767–76.
43.
BrownE.A., DaviesS.J., RutherfordP., MeeusF., BorrasM., RiegelW., Divino FilhoJ.C., VoneshE., van BreeM; EAPOS Group. Survival of functionally anuric patients on automated peritoneal dialysis: the European APD Outcome Study. J Am Soc Nephrol2003; 14: 2948–57.
44.
HeimburgerO., WaniewskiJ., WerynskiA., TranaeusA., LindholmB.Peritoneal transport in CAPD with permanent loss of ultrafiltration capacity. Kidney Int1990; 38: 495–506.
45.
WilliamsJ.D., CraigK.J., TopleyN., Von RuhlandC., FallonM., NewmanG.R., MackenzieR.K., WilliamsG.T.Morphologic changes in the peritoneal membrane of patients with renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol2002; 13: 470–9.
46.
NumataM., NakayamaM., NimuraS., KawakamiM., LindholmB., KawaguchiY.Association between an increased surface area of peritoneal microvessels and a high peritoneal solute transport rate. Perit Dial Int2003; 23: 116–22.
47.
YamamotoR., NakayamaM., HasegawaT.High-transport membrane is a risk factor for encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis developing after long-term continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis treatment. Adv Perit Dial2002; 18: 131–4.
48.
Di PaoloN., SacchiG., De MiaM.Morphology of the peritoneal membrane during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Nephron1986; 44: 204–11.
49.
KjellstrandP., MartinsonE., WieslanderA.Degradation in peritoneal dialysis fluids may be avoided by using low pH and high glucose concentration. Perit Dial Int2001; 21: 338–44.
50.
RippeB., SimonsenO., HeimburgerO.Long-term clinical effects of a peritoneal dialysis fluid with less glucose degradation products. Kidney Int2001; 59: 348–57.
51.
SkoufosL., TopleyN., CookerL., DawnayA., MillarD.J., HolmesCJ, FaictD.The in vitro biocompatibility performance of a 25 mmol/L bicarbonate/10 mmol/L lactate buffered peritoneal dialysis fluid. Kidney Int2003; 64(suppl 88): S94–9.
52.
TranaeusA.A long-term study of a bicarbonate/lactate-based peritoneal dialysis solution-clinical benefits. The bicarbonate lactate study group. Perit Dial Int2000; 20: 516–23.
53.
WilkieM.E., PlantM.J., EdwardsL., BrownC.B.Icodextrin 7.5% dialysate solution (glucose polymer) in patients with ultrafiltration failure: extension of CAPD technique survival. Perit Dial Int1997; 17: 84–7.
54.
JonesM., HagenT., BoyleC.A.Treatment of malnutrition with 1.1% amino acid peritoneal dialysis solution: Results of a multicenter outpatient study. Am J Kidney Dis1998; 32: 761–9.
55.
Le PooleC., WeijmerM., van IttersumF., ter WeeP., ValentijnR., van GeelenJ.Clinical effect of a peritoneal dialysis regimen low in glucose and glucose degradation product compared to a standard peritoneal dialysis regimen in new CAPD patients (Abstract). Perit Dial Int2003; 23(suppl 1): S52.
56.
MarshallJ., JenningsP., ScottA., FluckR.J., McIntyreC.W.Glycemic control in diabetic CAPD patients assessed by continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS). Kidney Int2003; 64: 1480–6.
57.
BergstromJ., LindholmB.Malnutrition, cardiac disease and mortality: Integrated point of view. Am J Kidney Dis1998; 32: 834–41.
58.
StenvinkelP., HeimburgerO., PaultreF., DiczfalusyU., WangT., BerglundL., JogestrandT.Strong association between malnutrition, inflammation, and atherosclerosis in chronic renal failure. Kidney Int1999; 55: 1899–911.
59.
Pecoits-FilhoR., CarvalhoM.J., ChungS.H., Divino-FilhoJ.C.interleukin 6 system and peritoneal solute transport rate: A longitudinal study (Abstract). J Am Soc Nephrol2002; 13: 42.
60.
ZeierM., SchwengerV., DeppischR.Glucose degradation products in PD fluids: Do they disappear from the peritoneal cavity and enter the systemic circulation?Kidney Int2003; 63: 298–305.
61.
PapanastasiouP., GrassL., RodelaH., PatrikareaA., OreopoulosD., DiamandisE.P.Immunological quantification of advanced glycosylation end-products in the serum of patients on hemodialysis or CAPD. Kidney Int1994: 216–22.
62.
Di PaoloN., PetriniG., GarosiG., BuoncristianiU., BrardiS., MonaciG.A new self-locating peritoneal catheter. Perit Dial Int1996; 16: 623–7.
63.
HeimburgerO., HolmesC., MujaisS.Introduction: Buffer system and biocompatibility in peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int2003; 64(suppl 88): S1–2.