PetitclercT., GouxN., ReynierA.L., BénéB.A model for noninvasive estimation of in vitro dialyser performances and patient's conductivity during hemodialysis. Int J Artif Organs1993; 16: 585–91.
4.
GotchF.A.On-line clearance: Advanced methodology to monitor adequacy of dialysis at no cost. Contrib Nephrol2002; 137: 268–71.
5.
MercadalL., PetitclercT., JaudonM.C., BénéB., GouxN., JacobsC.Is ionic dialysance a valid parameter for quantification of dialysis efficiency?Artif Organs1998; 22: 1005–9.
6.
DiFilippoS., ManzoniC., AndrulliS., PontorieroG., Dell'OroC., La MiliaV., BacchiniG., CrepaldiM., BigiM.C., LocatelliF.How to determine ionic dialysance for the online assessment of delivered dialysis dose. Kidney Int2001; 59: 774–82.
7.
LindsayR.M., BénéB., GouxN., HeidenheimA.P., LandgrenC., SternbyC.Relationship between effective ionic dialysance and in vivo urea clearance during hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis2001; 38: 565–74.
8.
MercadalL., Tezenas Du MontcelS.T., JaudonM.C., HamaniA., IzzedineH., DerayG., BeneB., PetitclercT.Ionic dialysance vs urea clearance in the absence of cardio pulmonary recirculation. Nephrol Dial Transplant2002; 17: 106–11.
9.
KatopodisK.P., HoenichN.A.Accuracy and clinical utility of dialysis dose measurement using online ionic dialysance. Clin Nephrol2002; 57: 215–20.
10.
GoldauR., KuhlmannU., SamadiN., GrossM., GrafT., OrlandiniG., MarcelliD., LangeH.Ionic dialysance measurement is urea distribution volume dependent: A new approach to better results. Artif Organs2002; 26: 321–32.
11.
GotchF., PanilioR., BayakiT., FoldenT.A new method to measure blood access flow rate (Qacc) from conductivity dialysance (Den). ASAIO J1998; 44: 62A.
12.
MercadalL., ChallierL., CluzelP., HamaniA., BoulechfarH., BoukhalfaZ., IzzedineH., BassiliosN., BarrouB., DerayG., PetitclercT.Detection of vascular access stenosis by measurement of access blood flow from ionic dialysance. Blood Purif2002; 20: 177–81.
13.
RahnatiM.A., RahmatiS., HoenichN., RoncoC., KaysenG.A., LevinR., LevinN.W.On-line clearance: A useful tool for monitoring the effectiveness of the reuse procedure. ASAIO J2003; 49: 543–6.
14.
DaugirdasJ.T., GreeneT., DepnerT.A., ChumleaC., RoccoM.J., ChertowG.M.Anthropometrically estimated total body water volumes are larger than modeled urea volume in chronic hemodialysis patients: Effect of age, race, and gender. Kidney Int2003; 64: 1108–19.
15.
McIntyreC.W., LambieS.H., MaartenW.T., FluckR.J.Assessment of hemodialysis adequacy by ionic dialysance: Intra-patient variability of delivered treatment. Nephrol Dial Transplant2003; 18: 559–62.
16.
RamS.J., WorkJ., CalditoG.C., EasonJ.M., PervezA., PaulsonW.D.A randomized controlled trial of blood flow and stenosis surveillance of hemodialysis grafts. Kidney Int2003; 64: 272–80.
17.
GoureauY., ManN.K.On-line measurement of ionic dialysance and evaluation of plasma sodium by manipulation of dialysate conductivity. J Nephrol1991; 4: 275–8.
