An increasing body of evidence indicates therapy dose and intensity influence the outcome of dialyzed ARF patients. However, a number of unanswered questions remain on this issue. These questions need to be addressed in future prospective, controlled trials that assess the effect of dose and intensity on outcome both within and between the various ARF renal replacement therapies, with appropriate and clinically relevant control arms. Such investigations should provide guidelines ultimately for the dialytic management of critically ill patients with ARF.
ClarkW.R., MuellerB.A., AlakaK.J., MaciasW.L.A comparison of metabolic control by continuous and intermittent therapies in acute renal failure.J Am Soc Nephrol1994; 4: 1413–20.
3.
ChimaC.S., MeyerL., HummellA.C., BosworthC., HeykaR., PaganiniE., WerynskiA.Protein catabolic rate in patients with acute renal failure on continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration and total parenteral nutrition.J Am Soc Nephrol1993; 3: 1516–21.
4.
ClarkW.R., MuellerB.A., KrausM.A., MaciasW.L.Extracorporeal therapy requirements for patients with acute renal failure.J Am Soc Nephrol1997; 8: 804–12.
LeblancM., GarredL., CardinalJ., PichetteV., NolinL., QuimetD., GeadahD.Catabolism in critical illness: Estimation from urea nitrogen appearance and creatinine production during continuous renal replacement therapy.Am J Kidney Dis1998; 32: 444–53.
7.
ClarkW.R., MuellerB.A., KrausM.A., MaciasW.L.Quantification of creatinine kinetic parameters in patients with acute renal failure.Kidney Int1998; 54: 554–60.
8.
BrunetS.Leblanc M, Geadah D, Parent D, Corteau S, Cardinal J. Diffusive and convective solute clearance during continuous renal replacement therapy at various dialysate and ultrafiltration flow rates.Am J Kidney Dis1999; 34: 486–92.
9.
EvansonJ., IkizlerT., WingardR., KnightsS., ShyrY., SchulmanG., HimmelfarbJ., HakimR.Measurement of the delivery of dialysis dose in acute renal failure.Kidney Int1999; 55: 1501–8.
10.
KanagasundaramN.S., LariveB., PaganiniE.P.A fractional dialysate collection method to estimate solute removal in continuous venovenous hemodialysis.Kidney Int2000; 58: 2579–84.
11.
HimmelfarbJ., EvansonJ., HakimR.M., FreedmanS., ShyrY., IkizlerT.A.Urea volume of distribution exceeds total body water in patients with acute renal failure.Kidney Int2002; 61: 317–23.
12.
ClarkW.R., RoncoC.Renal replacement therapy quantification in acute renal failure: Solute removal mechanisms and dose quantification.Kidney Int1998; 53(Suppl 66): S133–7.
13.
GillumD.M., DixonB.S., YanoverM.J., KelleherS., ShapiroM., BenedettiR.The role of intensive dialysis in acute renal failure.Clin Nephrol1986; 25: 249–55.
14.
PaganiniE.P., TapolyaiM., GoormasticM., HalstenbergW., KozlowskiL., LeblancM., LeeJ.C., MorenoL., SakaiK.Establishing a dialysis therapy/patient outcome link in intensive care unit acute dialysis for patients with acute renal failure.Am J Kidney Dis1996; 28(Suppl 3): S81–9.
15.
SchifflH., LangS.M., FischerR.Daily hemodialysis and the outcome of acute renal failure.NEJM2002; 346: 305–10.
16.
DaugirdasJ.T.Second-generation estimates of single-pool variable volume Kt/V: An analysis of error.J Am Soc Nephrol1993; 4: 1205–13.
17.
CasinoF.G., LopezT.The equivalent renal urea clearance: A new parameter to assess dialysis dose.Nephrol Dial Transplant1996; 11: 1574–91.
18.
GotchF.A.The current place of urea kinetic modeling with respect to different dialysis modalities.Nephrol Dial Transplant1998; 13(Suppl 6): S10–4.
19.
ClarkW.R., LeypoldtJ.K., HendersonL.W., MuellerB.A., ScottM.K., VoneshE.F.Quantifying the effect of changes in the hemodialysis prescription on effective solute removal with a mathematical model.J Am Soc Nephrol1999; 10: 601–9.
20.
ClarkW.R., HendersonL.W.Renal vs continuous vs intermittent therapies for removal of uremic toxins.Kidney Int2001; 59(Suppl 78): S298–303.
21.
StorckM., HartlW., ZimmererE., InthornD.Comparison of pump-driven and spontaneous hemofiltration in postoperative acute renal failure.Lancet1991; 337: 452–5.
22.
RoncoC., BellomoR., HommelP., BrendolanA., DanM., PiccinniP., LaGrecaG.Effects of different doses in continuous veno-venous hemofiltration on outcomes in acute renal failure: A prospective, randomized trial.Lancet2000; 355: 26–30.
23.
HonoreP.M., JamezJ., WauthierM.Prospective evaluation of short-term, high-volume isovolemic hemofiltration on the hemodynamic course and outcome in patients with intractable circulatory failure resulting from septic shock.Crit Care Med2000; 28: 3581–7.
24.
GettingsL.G., ReynoldsH.N., ScaleaT.Outcome in post-traumatic acute renal failure when continuous renal replacement therapy is applied early vs. late.Intens Care Med1999; 25: 805–13.
