LeypoldtI.K., CheungA.K., CarrollC.E.. Effect of dialysis membranes and middle molecule removal on chronic hemodialysis patients survival.Am J Kidney Dis1999; 33: 349–55.
2.
RoncoC., BrendolanA., BragantiniL., ChiaramonteS., FerianiM., La GrecaG.. Technical and clinical evaluation of four different highly efficient short dialysis techniques.Contrib Nephrol1988; 61: 46–53.
3.
Lee CjHsiongC.H., ChangY.L., ChengC.H., LianI.D.. Statistical and parameteric analysis of beta-2 microglobulin removal from uremic patients in high flux hemodialysis.ASAJO1994; 140: 62–6.
4.
FloegeI., GranollerasC., DeschodtG.. High flux synthetic versus cellulosic membranes for beta-2 microglobulin removal during hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration and hemofiltration.Nephrol Dial Transplant1989; 4: 653–7.
5.
LocatelliF., MastrangeloF., RedaelliB.. Effects of different membranes and dialysis technologies on patient treatment tolerance and nutritional parameters.Kidney Int1996; 50: 1293–302.
6.
La GrecaG., BrendolanA., GhezziP.M.. The concept of sorbents in hemodialysis.Int J Artif Organs1998; 21: 303–8.
7.
TettaC., BellomoR., BrendolanA.. Use of adsorptive mechanisms in continuous renal replacement therapies in the critically ill.Kidney Int1999; 56(Suppl 72): S15–S19.
8.
JostW.. Diffusion in solids, liquids, gases.New York: Academic Press, 1965.
9.
ScheideggerA.E.. The physics of flow through porous media.New York: McMillan1960.
