Abstract
The article engages with the ideal of deliberation within the theoretical contours of deliberative democracy, situating its inquiry in the intellectual and political traditions of ancient India. Drawing upon canonical texts such as the Rig Veda, Atharva Veda, Arthashastra and Mahabharata, it interrogates the embedded deliberative practices characterised by dialogical engagement, rational reciprocity and consensus-oriented decision-making. These traditions underscore the centrality of deliberation as a normative principle in governance, reflecting a sophisticated understanding of its epistemic and procedural dimensions. Modern deliberative democratic theory, predominantly rooted in Western intellectual traditions, often delineates a linear and prescriptive pathway for democratic deliberation. However, this emphasis risks marginalising alternative cultural and historical paradigms. This study contends that the deliberative practices of ancient India, with their distinct normative and procedural configurations, offer a fertile ground for rethinking and expanding the theoretical scope of deliberative democracy. The integration of these traditions addresses feasibility challenges, particularly in contexts marked by sociopolitical plurality and historical complexity. By tracing the continuity of deliberative ideals from ancient to contemporary India, this inquiry situates itself within a broader epistemological project that seeks to pluralise democratic theory. It underscores the capacity of Indian deliberative traditions to contribute to the conceptual enrichment and contextual adaptability of deliberative democracy in an increasingly diverse and globalised world.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
