William Jones, famously, by identifying close linkages between Sanskrit and European languages, gave birth to research into the common ancestry between Indians and Europeans. In the earlier years of contention on the matter, India was considered the cradle of civilisation and Sanskrit as the mother of all Indo-European languages. With the rise in the imperial power of Europe over India, the cradle of civilisation began to shift outside India and ultimately landed in Europe. Simultaneously, the idea of invasion of India by the ‘Aryan race’, or the Aryan invasion theory (AIT), was promoted. Since then, however, one archaeological find over another have consistently refuted the AIT, proving it as false. As flawed as it remains, this theory has, nonetheless, persisted and morphed in its current form as the Aryan migration theory (AMT) and continues to find mention and favour in contemporary academic discourse. In mainstream academia, today, whether in grade-school texts or in texts meant for undergraduate and graduate study, whenever India and Hinduism are mentioned, the coming of Aryans from outside of India and establishing Hinduism and civilisation in India are discussed as veritable facts. By examining the theory in anticolonial and postcolonial contexts, we show that despite considerable archaeological evidence refuting the theories of the invasion or migration of Aryans into India, its colonial embeddedness in the notion of the racial superiority of the Europeans or people with European ancestry that the theory does not fade into oblivion.
AgarwalD. P., and SoodR. K.‘Ecological Factors and Harappan Civilization’. In Harappan Civilization: A Contemporary Perspective, edited by PossehlGregory L., 223–31. Delhi: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
2.
AllchinF. R.The Archaeology of Early Historic South Asia: The Emergence of Cities and States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
3.
BryantE.The Quest for the Origins of Vedic Culture: The Indo-Aryan Migration Debate. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
4.
California Department of Education. Chapter Ten: History Social Science Framework for California Public Schools: Kindergarten Through Grade Twelve, 2016, https://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/hs/cf/documents/hssfwchapter10.pdf (accessed on 15May2019).
5.
Cavalli-SforzaL., MenozziP., and PiazzaA.. The History and Geography of Human Genes. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.
6.
ChakrabartiD.K. ‘India and the Druids’. Antiquity, 197 (1976): 66–67.
7.
ChakrabartiD. K.Colonial Indology: Sociopolitics of the Ancient Past. Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal, 1997.
8.
ChakrabartiD. K.The Battle for Ancient India: An Essay in the Sociopolitics of Indian Archaeology. New Delhi: Aryan Books International, 2008.
DaninoM.The Lost River: On the Trail of the Sarasvati. New York: Penguin, 2010.
11.
FlamL.The Paleogeography and Prehistoric Settlement Patterns in Sindh, Pakistan (ca. 4000–2000 b.c.), Ph.D. diss., South Asia Regional Studies, University of Pennsylvania, 1981.
12.
FlamL.‘Fluvial Geomorphology of the Lower Indus Basin (Sindh, Pakistan) and the Indus Civilization’. In Himalaya to the Sea: Geology, Geomorphology and the Quaternary, edited by SchroderJ. F., 265–326. New York: Routledge, 1993.
13.
FloodG.An Introduction to Hinduism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
14.
GamkrelidzeT., and VjaceslavV. Ivanov. ‘The Ancient Near East and the Indo-European Question: Temporal and Territorial Characteristics of Proto-Indo-European Based on Linguistic and Historical-Cultural Data’. Journal of Indo-European Studies, 13 (1985a): 3–48.
15.
GamkrelidzeT., and IvanovVjaceslav V.. ‘The Migration of Tribes Speaking the Indo-European Dialects from Their Original Homeland in the Near East to Their Historical Habitations in Eurasia’. Journal of Indo-European Studies, 13 (1985b): 49–91.
16.
GimbutasM.‘Primary and Secondary Homeland of the Indo-Europeans’. Journal of Indo-European Studies, 13(1985): 185–202.
HeestermanJ. C.The Inner Conflict of Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.
19.
JonesW.‘On the Origin and Family of Nations’. Asiatic Researches, Vol. 3. Reprinted in The Collected Works of William Jones, edited by CannonGarland, 185–204. New York: New York University Press, 1792/1993.
20.
Kautilya. The Arthashastra. Translated and edited by RangarajanL. N.. New Delhi: Penguin Books, 1992.
21.
KellyRobin D. G.‘Poetics of Anticolonialism’. In Discourse on Colonialism, edited by CésaireAimé, and translated by PinkhamJoan, 7–28. New York: Monthly Review Press, 2000.
22.
KennedyK. A. R.‘Skulls, Aryans and Flowing Drains: The Interface of Archeology and Skeletal Biology in the Study of the Harappan Civilization’. In Harappan Civilization: A Contemporary Perspective, edited by PossehlGregory L., 289–95. Delhi: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
23.
KennedyK. A. R.‘Trauma and Disease in Ancient Harappans’. In Frontiers of the Indus Civilization, edited by LalB. B. and GuptaS. P., 425–36. Delhi: Books & Books, 1984.
24.
KennedyK.A. R. ‘Biological Anthropology of Human Skeletons from Harappa: 1928–1988’. Eastern Anthropologist, 45, no. 1–2 (1992): 55–86.
25.
KennedyK.A. R.‘Identification of Sacrificial and Massacre Victims in Archeological Sites: The Skeletal Evidence’. Man and Environment, 19, no. 1–2 (1994), 247–51.
26.
KennedyK. A. R.‘Have the Aryans Been Identified in the Prehistoric Skeletal Record from South Asia? Biological Anthropology and Concepts of Ancient Races’. In The Indo-Aryans of Ancient South Asia: Language, Material Culture and Ethnicity, edited by ErdosyG., 32–66. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1995.
27.
KennedyK.A. R. God-Apes and Fossil Men: Paleoanthropology in South Asia. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2000.
28.
KennedyV.Researches into the Origin and Affinity of the Principal Languages of India. London: Longman, 1828.
29.
KenoyerJ. M.‘Urban Process in the Indus Tradition: A Preliminary Model from Harappa’. In Harappa Excavations 1986–1990, edited by MeadowR. H., 29–60. Madison: Prehistory Press, 1991.
30.
KenoyerJ. M.‘Culture Change During the Late Harappan Period at Harappa: New Insights on Vedic Aryan Issues’. In The Indo-Aryan Controversy: Evidence and Inference in Indian History, edited by BryantEdwin F. and PattonLaurie L., 21–49. New York: Routledge, 2005.
31.
LalB. B.‘Aryan Invasion of India: Perpetuation of a Myth’. In The Indo-Aryan Controversy: Evidence and Inference in Indian History, edited by BryantEdwin F. and PattonLaurie L., 50–74. New York: Routledge, 2005.
32.
LalB. B.How Deep are the Roots of Indian Civilization? Archaeology Answers. New Delhi: Aryan Books, 2009.
33.
LalB. B.Piecing Together: Memoirs of an Archaeologist. New Delhi: Aryan Books, 2011.
34.
Lamberg-KarlovskyC.C.‘Archeology and Language: The Indo-Iranians’. Current Anthropology, 43(2002): 63–88.
35.
MalloryJ. P.In Search of the Indo-Europeans: Language, Archeology, and Myth. London: Thames and Hudson, 1989.
36.
MillJ.The History of British India: Volume 1. London: Baldwin, Cradock, and Joy, 2015.
37.
MonboddoJ. B.Of the Origins and Progress of Language. Edinburgh: J. Balfour; T. Cadell, 1774.
38.
MughalR.M. ‘Harappan Settlement Systems and Patterns in the Greater Indus Valley’. Pakistan Archeology, 25(1990): 1–72.
39.
MughalR. M.Ancient Cholistan: Archaeology and Architecture. Karachi: Department of Culture and Tourism, Government of Sindh, 1997.
RenfrewC.Archeology and Language: The Puzzle of Indo-European Origin. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
44.
ShafferJ. G.‘The Protohistoric Period in the Eastern Punjab: A Preliminary Assessment’. In Indus Civilization: New Perspectives, edited by DaniA. H., 65–101. Islamabad: Quaid-i-Azam University, 1981.
45.
ShafferJ. G.‘Harappan Culture: A Reconsideration’. In Harappan Civilization: A Contemporary Perspective, edited by PossehlGregory L., 41–50. Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing, 1982.
46.
ShafferJ. G.‘Cultural Development in the Eastern Punjab’. In Studies in the Archeology of India and Pakistan, edited by JacobsonJ., 74–90. Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing, 1986.
47.
ShafferJ. G.‘Indus Valley, Baluchistan, and the Helmand Traditions: Neolithic through Bronze Age’. In Chronologies in Old World Archaeology. Vols. I and II, edited by EhrichR. W.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 441–64 in Vol. 1 and pp. 425–46 in Vol. II, 1992.
48.
ShafferJ. G.‘Reurbanization: The Eastern Punjab and Beyond’. In Urban form and Meaning in South Asia: The Shaping of Cities from Prehistoric to Precolonial Times, edited by SpodekH. and SrinivasanD. M., 53–67. Washington, DC: National Gallery of Art, 1993.
49.
ShafferJ. G., and LichtensteinD. A.‘Ethnicity and Change in the Indus Valley Cultural Tradition’. In Old Problems and New Perspectives in the Archeology of South Asia, edited by KenoyerJ. M., 17–26. Madison: University of Wisconsin, 1989.
50.
ShafferJ. G., and LichtensteinD. A.‘The Concepts of Cultural Tradition and Paleoethnicity in South Asian Archaeology’. In The Indo-Aryans of Ancient South Asia: Language, Material Culture and Ethnicity, edited by ErdosyG., 126–54. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1995.
51.
ShafferJ. G., and LichtensteinD. A.‘Migration, Philology and South Asian Archeology’. In Aryan and Non-Aryan in South Asia: Evidence, Interpretation and Ideology, edited by BronkhurstJ. and DeshpandeM. M., 239–60. New Delhi: Manohar Publishers, 1999.
52.
ShafferJ. G., and AD.‘South Asian Archeology and the Myth of Indo-Aryan Invasions’. In The Indo-Aryan Controversy: Evidence and Inference in Indian History, edited by BryantEdwin F. and PattonLaurie L., 75–104. New York: Routledge, 2005.
53.
TrautmannT. R.‘Elephants and the Mauryas’. In India: History and Thought, editd by MuckerjeeS., 245–81. Calcutta: University of Calcutta, 1982.
54.
WheelerR.E. M. ‘Harappa 1946: The Defenses and Cemetery R-37’. Ancient India, 3(1947): 58–130.
55.
WheelerR. E. M.‘Early India and Pakistan: To Ashoka’. New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1959.
