AbernethyB.: Visual search strategies and decision-making in sport. Int J Sport Psychol22: 189–210, 1991
2.
AbernethyB.: The effects of age and expertise upon perceptual skill development in a racquet sport. Res Quart Exerc Sport59: 210–221, 1988
3.
AbernethyB., RussellD.G.: Expert-novice differences in an applied selective attention task. J Sport Psychol9: 326–345, 1987
4.
AbernethyB., RussellD.Q.: The relationship between expertise and visual search strategy in a racquet sport. Hum Movement Sci6: 283–319, 1987
5.
AbernethyB., WannJ.P., ParksS.L.: Training perceptual-motor skills for sport, in ElliottB.C. (ed): International Handbook of Sport Sciences. Volume 3. Chichester, Wiley, in press, 1996
6.
AbernethyB., WoodJ.: An assessment of the effectiveness of selected visual training programs in enhancing sports performance. Report to the Australian Sports Commission. Canberra, Australia, 1992
7.
AlainC., ProteauL.: Decision-making in sport, in NadeauC.H., HalliwellW.R., NewellK.M. (eds): Psychology of Motor Behavior and Sport 1979.Champaign, IL, Human Kinetics, 1980, pp 465–477
8.
AllardF., GrahamS., PaarsaluM.E.: Perception in sport: Basketball. J Sport Psychol2: 14–21, 1980
9.
CarelloC., TurveyM.T., KuglerP.N.: Inadequacies in the computer metaphor, in GazzanigaM. (ed): Handbook of Cognitive Neuroscience.New York, Plenum, 1984, pp 229–248
10.
ChaseW.G., SimonH.A.: Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychol4: 55–81, 1973
11.
EricssonK.A., KrampeR.T., Tesch-RomerC.: The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev100: 363–406, 1993
12.
HelsenW., PauwelsJ.M.: The relationship between expertise and visual information processing in sport, in StarkesJ., AllardF. (eds): Cognitive Issues in Motor Expertise.Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1993, pp 109–134
13.
HowarthC., WalshW.D., AbernethyB.: A field examination of anticipation in squash: Some preliminary data. Aust J Sci Med Sport16(3): 6–10, 1984
14.
HymanR.: Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. J Exp Psychol45: 188–196, 1953
15.
JohanssonG.: Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept Psychophys14: 201–211, 1973
16.
LeibowitzH.W., VingerP.F., LandersD.M.: Can visual training improve athletic performance? Report to the US Olympic Committee, 1989
17.
MilgramP.: A spectacle-mounted liquid crystal tachistoscope. Behav Res Meth Instr Computers19: 449–456. 1987
18.
PosnerM.I., NissenM.J., KleinR.M.: Visual dominance: An information processing account of its origins and significance. Psychol Rev83: 157–171, 1976
19.
SingerR.N.: Motor learning research: Meaningful for physical educators or a waste of time?Quest42: 114–125, 1990
20.
StarkesJ.L.: Skill in field hockey: The nature of the cognitive advantage. J Sport Psychol9: 146–160, 1987
21.
StarkesJ.L., DeakinJ.: Perception in sport: A cognitive approach to skilled performance, in StraubW.F., WilliamsJ.M. (eds): Cognitive Sport Psychology.Lansing, NY, Sport Science Associates, 1984, pp 115–128
22.
ThomasJ.R., FrenchK.E., HumphriesC.A.: Knowledge development and sport performance: Directions for motor behavior research. J Sport Psychol8: 259–272, 1986
23.
VickersJ.N.: Knowledge structures of elite-novice gymnasts. Hum Movement Sci7: 47–72, 1988
24.
WilliamsA.M., DavidsK., BurwitzL.: Visual search strategies in experienced and inexperienced soccer players. Res Q Exerc Sport65: 127–1351994
25.
YandellK.M., SpirdusoW.W.: Sex and athletic status as factors in reaction latency and movement time. Res Q Exerc Sport52: 495–504, 1981