A biomechanical comparison of eight popular commer cially available rehabilitative knee braces was under taken using a specially designed mechanical surrogate and computerized data acquisition system. Tests con ducted included passive extension, valgus rotation, and anterior-posterior tibial translation. Most of the braces tested significantly reduced both translations and rota tions compared to the unbraced limb under static test conditions. Braced versus braced performance varied and was found to depend upon a number of mechanical and design factors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Clancy WG, Narechania RG, Roland GC: In-vivo measurement of normal and abnormal knee joint laxity. Trans Orthop Res Soc24: 281 , 1978
2.
Daniel DM, Malcom LL, Losse G., et al: Instrumented measurement of antenor laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg67A: 720-726, 1985
3.
Grood ES, Noyes FR, Butler DL, et al: Ligamentous and capsular restraints preventing straight medial and lateral laxity in intact human cadaver knees. J Bone Joint Surg63A: 1257-1269, 1981
4.
Hofman AA, Wyatt Rwb, Boume MH, et al: Knee stability in orthotic knee braces. Am J Sports Med12: 371-374, 1984
5.
Jacobsen K.: Stress radiographical measurement of the anteroposterior medial and lateral stability of the knee joint. Acta Orthop Scand47: 335-344, 1976
6.
Kennedy JC, Fowler PJ: Medial and anterior instability of the knee: An anatomical and clinical study using stress machines. J Bone Joint Surg53A: 1257-1270, 1971
7.
Klein KK: An instrument for testing the medial and lateral collateral ligament stability of the knee. Am J Surg104: 768-772, 1962
8.
Krackow KA, Vetter WL: Knee motion in a long leg cast. Am J Sports Med9: 233-239, 1981
9.
Lowe PJ, Saunders Gab: Knee analyzer: An objective method of evaluating mediolateral stability in the knee. Med Biol Eng Comput15: 548-552, 1977
10.
Markolf KL, Graff-Radford A., Amstutz HC: In vivo knee stability. A quantitative assessment using an instrumented clinical testing apparatus. J Bone Joint Surg60A: 664-674, 1978
11.
Oliver JH, Coughlin LP: Objective knee evaluation using the Genucom knee analysis system: Clinical implications. Am J Sports Med15: 571-577, 1987
12.
Paulos LE, France EP, Rosenberg TD, et al: The biomechanics of lateral knee bracing Part I: Response of the valgus restraints to loading. Am J Sports Med15: 419-429, 1987
13.
Skyhar MJ, Cawley PW: Clinical evaluation of the 4-point ACL brace: A preliminary report of phase one (Technical report). DonJoy Orthopedic, 1983
14.
Sprague RB, Tipton CM, Flatt AE: Evaluation of a photographic method for measuring leg abduction and adduction . Physiotherapy46: 1068-1078, 1966
15.
Torzilli PA , Greenberg RL, Hood RW, et al: Measurement of anterior-posterior motion of the knee in injured patients using a biomechanical stress technique . J Bone Joint Surg66A: 1438-1442, 1984
