CucaJM: NIH grant applications for clinical research: Reasons for poor ratings or disapproval. Clin Res31:453–463, 1983
2.
EavesGN: The project grant application of the National Institutes of Health. Fed Proc32:1541–1543, 1973
3.
EavesGN: Review of research grant applications at National Institutes of Health. Proceedings from a workshop on thinking and writing clearly: Preparing an application for support, 1982, pp. 3 —
4.
EavesGN: A successful grant application to the National Institutes of Health: Case history. Grants Mag1:263 —, 1978
5.
HenleyC: Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health. 1. Assignment and referral processes. Fed Proc36:2066–2068, 1977; 2.
6.
Review by an initial review group. Fed Proc36:2186–2190, 1977; 3. Review by an advisory board council. Fed Proc36:2335–2338, 1977
7.
MerrittDHEavesGH: Site visits for the review of grant applications to the National Institutes of Health. Views of an application and scientist administrator. Fed Proc34:131–136, 1975
8.
NIH guide for grants and contracts, US Department of Health and Human Services. Vol 14No 4, 1985.
9.
NovelloAC: The peer review process: How to prepare research grant applications to the NIH. Miner Electrolyte Metab11:281–286, 1985