Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
The Effect of Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters and Kinematics on the Morphology and Symptomatology of Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) morphology is common in asymptomatic adults. Spinopelvic alignment modulates hip mechanics and influences hip range of motion. Specific spinopelvic parameters, such as pelvic incidence and dynamic parameters, have been inconsistently associated with FAI. Yet, their specific influence on FAI morphology and symptomatology remains uncertain.
Purpose:
To determine how morphologic, postural, and dynamic spinopelvic parameters differ according to FAI morphology (cam, pincer) and symptomatology.
Study Design:
Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched from inception to December 23, 2024. Studies reporting spinopelvic parameters in symptomatic or asymptomatic FAI compared with controls were included. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and rated methodological quality (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale [NOS]). Fixed- or random-effects meta-analyses of mean differences were stratified by parameter, FAI type, and concept (morphology vs symptomatology).
Results:
A total of 41 studies (n = 3750; 1343 symptomatic, 821 asymptomatic FAI; 1586 controls; median NOS 6/9) were included. Symptomatic cam hips had higher pelvic incidence (PI) than asymptomatic cam hips (mean difference [MD], 4.94° [95% CI, −0.10 to 9.98]; P = .05). Pincer morphology was linked to lower PI versus controls (MD, −5.13° [95% CI, −8.70 to −1.57]; P < .01). No significant differences emerged for pelvic tilt or sacral slope. Cam FAI exhibited reduced posterior pelvic excursion in late-phase squat (MD, −5.23° [95% CI, −7.17 to −3.30]; P < .01) and a modest global excursion increase during gait (MD, 0.38° [95% CI, 0.05 to 0.72]; P = .03).
Conclusion:
Low PI was linked to pincer morphology, suggesting a primary prevention target during development. Cam hips with higher PI were predisposed to symptoms. Symptomatic cam FAI also showed diminished pelvic rollback and increased anterior pelvic tilt, identifying kinematic targets for conservative management. Finally, dynamic spinopelvic characteristics more consistently demonstrated significant differences than static ones and may be more clinically pertinent in FAI research.
AlterTDWichmanDMFennTW, et al. Hip and pelvis movement patterns in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome differ from controls and change after hip arthroscopy during a step-down pivot-turn task. Orthop J Sports Med. 2024;12(2):23259671231169200.
2.
AtkinsPRFiorentinoNMHartleJA, et al. In vivo pelvic and hip joint kinematics in patients with cam femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a dual fluoroscopy study. J Orthop Res. 2020;38(4):823-833.
3.
AzevedoDCPaivaEBLopesAMA, et al. Pelvic rotation in femoroacetabular impingement is decreased compared to other symptomatic hip conditions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016;46(11):957-964.
4.
BagwellJJPowersCM. Persons with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome exhibit altered pelvifemoral coordination during weightbearing and non-weightbearing tasks. Clin Biomech. 2019;65:51-56.
5.
BagwellJJSnibbeJGerhardtMPowersCM. Hip kinematics and kinetics in persons with and without cam femoroacetabular impingement during a deep squat task. Clin Biomech. 2016;31(Complete):87-92.
6.
BoulayCTardieuCHecquetJ, et al. Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(4):415-422.
7.
BrissonNLamontagneMKennedyMJBeauléPE. The effects of cam femoroacetabular impingement corrective surgery on lower-extremity gait biomechanics. Gait Posture. 2013;37(2):258-263.
8.
Brown-TaylorLSchroederBLewisCL, et al. Sex-specific sagittal and frontal plane gait mechanics in persons post-hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. J Orthop Res. 2020;38(11):2443-2453.
9.
CatelliDSKowalskiEBeauléPELamontagneM. Increased pelvic mobility and altered hip muscles contraction patterns: two-year follow-up cam-FAIS corrective surgery. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2019;6(2):140-148.
10.
CatelliDSKowalskiEBeauléPELamontagneM. Muscle and hip contact forces in asymptomatic men with cam morphology during deep squat. Front Sports Act Living. 2021;3:716626.
11.
CatelliDSKowalskiEBeauléPESmitKLamontagneM. Asymptomatic participants with a femoroacetabular deformity demonstrate stronger hip extensors and greater pelvis mobility during the deep squat task. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6(7):2325967118782484.
12.
CatelliDSNgKCGWesselingM, et al. Hip muscle forces and contact loading during squatting after cam-type FAI surgery. J Bone Joint Surg. 2020;102(Suppl 2):34-42.
13.
ChenHFZhaoCQ. Pelvic incidence variation among individuals: functional influence versus genetic determinism. J Orthop Surg. 2018;13(1):59.
14.
CohenJ. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2. ed., reprint. Psychology Press; 1988.
15.
ColasantiCAShankarDSLiZI, et al. Effect of spinopelvic parameters on outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2024;52(7):1735-1743.
16.
CoulombRMichaudJMauryE, et al. Radiological signs of femoroacetabular impingement are linked to pelvic version in asymptomatic subjects. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023;109(suppl 8):103719.
17.
DiamondLEBennellKLWrigleyTV, et al. Trunk, pelvis and hip biomechanics in individuals with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: strategies for step ascent. Gait Posture. 2018;61:176-182.
18.
DiamondLEBennellKLWrigleyTVHinmanRSO’DonnellJHodgesPW. Squatting biomechanics in individuals with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49(8):1520-1529.
19.
van ErpJHGielisWPArbabiV, et al. Unravelling the hip-spine dilemma from the CHECK-cohort: is sagittal pelvic morphology linked to radiographic signs of femoroacetabular impingement?HIP Int. 2023;33(6):1079-1085.
20.
FaderRRTaoMAGaudianiMA, et al. The role of lumbar lordosis and pelvic sagittal balance in femoroacetabular impingement. Bone Joint J. 2018;100B(10):1275-1279.
21.
GebhartJJWeinbergDSBohlMSLiuRW. Relationship between pelvic incidence and osteoarthritis of the hip. Bone Jt Res. 2016;5(2):66-72.
22.
González-De-La-FlorÁGarcía-ArrabéMFernández-PardoTCotteretC. Clinical presentation of anterior pelvic tilt and trunk muscle endurance among patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024;60(6).
23.
GraffosAMohtajebMMonyM, et al. Biomechanics during cross-body lunging in individuals with and without painful cam and/or pincer morphology. Clin Biomech. 2020;76.
24.
GrammatopoulosGSpeirsADNgKCG, et al. Acetabular and spino-pelvic morphologies are different in subjects with symptomatic cam femoro-acetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 2018;36(7):1840-1848.
25.
van der GrondeB a. TDSchlösserTPCvan ErpJHJ, et al. Current evidence for spinopelvic characteristics influencing total hip arthroplasty dislocation risk. JBJS Rev. 2022;10(8).
26.
HaleRFMeluginHPZhouJ, et al. Incidence of femoroacetabular impingement and surgical management trends over time. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(1):35-41.
27.
HeckmannNDLiebermanJR. Spinopelvic biomechanics and total hip arthroplasty: a primer for clinical practice. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021;29(18):e888-e903.
28.
HeimannAFMurmannVSchwabJMTannastM. Influence of acetabular and femoral morphology on pelvic tilt: a study of 388 hips. Bone Joint J. 2024;106-B(5 Supple B):3-10.
29.
HellmanMDHaughomBDBrownNMFillinghamYAPhilipponMJNhoSJ. Femoroacetabular impingement and pelvic incidence: radiographic comparison to an asymptomatic control. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(3):545-550.
30.
HetsroniIFunkSBen-SiraDNyskaMPalmanovichEAyalonM. Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome is associated with alterations in hindfoot mechanics: a three-dimensional gait analysis study. Clin Biomech. 2015;30(10):1189-1193.
31.
HigginsJPTThomasJChandlerJ, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.4 (Updated August 2023). Cochrane; 2023.
32.
KobayashiNHigashihiraSKitayamaH, et al. Effect of decreasing the anterior pelvic tilt on range of motion in femoroacetabular impingement: a computer-simulation study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9(4):2325967121999464.
33.
LamontagneMKennedyMJBeauléPE. The effect of cam FAI on hip and pelvic motion during maximum squat. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(3):645-650.
34.
LandisJRKochGG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-174.
35.
LawtonCDButlerBASelleyRS, et al. Pelvic incidence in a femoroacetabular impingement population. J Orthop. 2020;22:90-94.
36.
LerchTDBoschungASchmaranzerF, et al. Lower pelvic tilt, lower pelvic incidence, and increased external rotation of the iliac wing in patients with femoroacetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion compared to hip dysplasia. Bone Jt Open. 2021;2(10):813-824.
37.
LewisCLKhuuALoverroKL. Gait alterations in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome differ by sex. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48(8):649-658.
38.
LewisCLLoverroKLKhuuA. Kinematic differences during single-leg step-down between individuals with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and individuals without hip pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48(4):270-279.
39.
LoCKLMertzDLoebM. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers’ to authors’ assessments. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:45.
40.
Mac-ThiongJMBerthonnaudÉDimarJRIBetzRRLabelleH. Sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis during growth. Spine. 2004;29(15):1642.
41.
MalloyPNeumannDAKippK. Hip biomechanics during a single-leg squat: 5 key differences between people with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and those without hip pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019;49(12):908-916.
42.
MalloyPWichmanDMGarciaFEspinoza-OríasAChahlaJNhoSJ. Impaired lower extremity biomechanics, hip external rotation muscle weakness, and proximal femoral morphology predict impaired single-leg squat performance in people with FAI syndrome. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(11):2984-2993.
43.
MangionePGomezDSenegasJ. Study of the course of the incidence angle during growth. Eur Spine J. 1997;6(3):163-167.
44.
MascarenhasVVRegoPDantasP, et al. Can we discriminate symptomatic hip patients from asymptomatic volunteers based on anatomic predictors? A 3-dimensional magnetic resonance study on cam, pincer, and spinopelvic parameters. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(13):3097-3110.
45.
MascarenhasVVRegoPDantasP, et al. Imaging prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in symptomatic patients, athletes, and asymptomatic individuals: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(1):73-95.
46.
MendiguchiaJGonzalez De la FlorAMendez-VillanuevaAMorinJBEdouardPGarruesMA. Training-induced changes in anterior pelvic tilt: potential implications for hamstring strain injuries management. J Sports Sci. 2021;39(7):760-767.
47.
NgKCGLamontagneMAdamczykAPRahkraKSBeauléPE. Patient-specific anatomical and functional parameters provide new insights into the pathomechanism of cam FAI. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(4):1289-1296.
48.
NgKCGLamontagneMJeffersJRTGrammatopoulosGBeauléPE. Anatomic predictors of sagittal hip and pelvic motions in patients with a cam deformity. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(6):1331-1342.
49.
OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. The Oxford levels of evidence 2. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. 2011 (accessed May 6, 2025).
50.
OhJSCynnHSWonJHKwonOYYiCH. Effects of performing an abdominal drawing-in maneuver during prone hip extension exercises on hip and back extensor muscle activity and amount of anterior pelvic tilt. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(6):320-324.
51.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
52.
PierannunziiL. Pelvic posture and kinematics in femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review. J Orthop Traumatol. 2017;18(3):187-196.
53.
PytiakABomarJDPetersonJB, et al. Analysis of spinal alignment and pelvic parameters on upright radiographs: implications for acetabular development. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2016;3(3):208-214.
54.
RivièreCHardijzerALazennecJYBeauléPMuirhead-AllwoodSCobbJ. Spine-hip relations add understandings to the pathophysiology of femoro-acetabular impingement: a systematic review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(4):549-557.
55.
RoussoulyPGolloglySBerthonnaudEDimnetJ. Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing positionSpine. 2005;30(3):346-353.
56.
RuNLiJLiYSunJWangGCuiX. Sacral anatomical parameters varies in different Roussouly sagittal shapes as well as their relations to lumbopelvic parameters. JOR Spine. 2021;4(4):e1180.
57.
RylanderJShuBFavreJSafranMAndriacchiT. Functional testing provides unique insights into the pathomechanics of femoroacetabular impingement and an objective basis for evaluating treatment outcome. J Orthop Res. 2013;31(9):1461-1468.
58.
SadeghianSMLewisCLShefelbineSJ. Can pelvic tilt cause cam morphology? A computational model of proximal femur development mechanobiology. J Biomech. 2023;157(Complete).
59.
SavageTNSaxbyDJPizzolatoC, et al. Trunk, pelvis and lower limb walking biomechanics are similarly altered in those with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome regardless of cam morphology size. Gait Posture. 2021;83:26-34.
60.
SchlösserTPCJanssenMMAVrtovecT, et al. Evolution of the ischio-iliac lordosis during natural growth and its relation with the pelvic incidence. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(7):1433-1441.
61.
SpikerAMKraszewskiAPMaakTG, et al. Dynamic assessment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome hips. Arthroscopy. 2021;38(2):404-416.e3.
62.
Van HouckeJPattynCVanden BosscheLRedantCMaesJWAudenaertEA. The pelvifemoral rhythm in cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Biomech. 2013;29(1):63-67.
63.
VaswaniRWhiteAEFeingoldJRanawatAS. Hip-spine syndrome in the nonarthritic patient. Arthroscopy. 2022;38(10):2930-2938.
64.
VerhaegenJCFDeVriesZRakhraKSpeirsABeaulePEGrammatopoulosG. Which acetabular measurements most accurately differentiate between patients and controls? A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024;482(2):259-274.
65.
WeinbergDSGebhartJJLiuRWSalataMJ. Radiographic signs of femoroacetabular impingement are associated with decreased pelvic incidence. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(5):806-813.
66.
YaredFMassaadABakounyZ, et al. Differences in kinematic changes from self-selected to fast speed gait in asymptomatic adults with radiological signs of femoro-acetabular impingement. Cureus. 2023;15(8):e43733.
67.
YinQFZhangJLiangTLiuYJZhangSXLiCB. The evaluation of sagittal pelvic-femoral kinematics in patients with cam-type femoracetabular impingement. Orthop Surg. 2021;13(6):1748-1754.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
