Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

Osteochondral autografts may be subject to suboptimal healing and graft degeneration due to surgical insult and the inflammatory environment of an injured joint.

Purpose/Hypothesis:

The purpose of this study was to alleviate the negative effect of this inflammatory milieu on the healing of osteochondral grafts by treating operative joints with interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra; Anakinra) in a porcine model. It was hypothesized that such treatment would reduce markers of inflammation and lead to improved implant structural and functional outcomes.

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

The authors performed an osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT) procedure on the weightbearing surface of the medial femoral condyle of adult Yucatan minipigs. Beginning 1 week after surgery, a subset of animals received an intra-articular injection of 8 mg Anakinra in the operative stifle on a weekly basis for 4 weeks. At the 5-week endpoint, mechanical testing of the cartilage was performed, synovium and osteochondral specimens were analyzed histologically using semiquantitative scoring systems, and subchondral bone was analyzed via micro–computed tomography.

Results:

IL-1ra–treated joints showed significantly less histological evidence of synovial inflammation. Autografts from treated joints showed better retention of mechanical properties and better histological scores.

Conclusion:

Results indicate that intra-articular IL-1ra administration after surgery significantly improves graft structure and function and dramatically enhances healing.

Clinical Relevance:

This study demonstrates that local provision of adjuvant anti-inflammatory therapeutics after OAT may enhance healing and protect graft integrity. This not only has implications for current clinical practice of osteochondral autograft (and allograft) procedures but also may allow expanded indications for advanced biological repair in a greater number of patients.

Keywords

articular cartilage resurfacing biologic healing enhancement biomechanics articular cartilage clinical medicine by anatomic region clinical medicine by specialty interest growth factors/healing enhancement knee,general research,in vivo or in vitro

Articular cartilage exhibits a poor endogenous healing response due to its avascular and hypocellular nature, and any damage that articular cartilage sustains may progress to the joint-wide disease of osteoarthritis (OA).¹⁸ Knee OA in particular represents an enormous clinical burden, with treatment for end-stage disease limited to partial or total joint replacement (TJR).¹¹ While limiting pain and restoring function, these metal and plastic devices begin to wear immediately on implantation, and many eventually require costly and invasive revision surgeries.¹ TJR of the knee carries elevated risk in younger patients given the limited functional longevity of the artificial joint.¹

Given this, earlier treatment through biological cartilage reconstruction with living tissue may be an optimal solution, and several such interventions exist for early-stage cartilage damage. These include marrow-stimulating techniques such as microfracture^5,16 and more advanced multistage procedures such as matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation, in which a patient's healthy cartilage cells are harvested, seeded in a collagen matrix, and reimplanted into the defect.⁶² However, these procedures are costly and involve a long postoperative recovery period, and the repair tissue that is formed is inferior to native cartilage.¹⁷ Osteochondral autografting (or allografting), which involves moving an osteochondral unit from a nonweightbearing portion of the knee (or from a fresh cadaver) into a defect site, is an attractive alternative to these cell-based procedures. This process restores a defect with immediately viable and mechanically robust cartilage tissue,²¹ has excellent outcomes, and can return patients to full weightbearing faster than other repair procedures.^8,59 However, these implants suffer from poor cartilage integration, may also suffer from poor bony integration, require precise shape and size matching, and, in the case of allografts, require strict disease screening¹⁸ and storage considerations.³ Moreover, like many biological repair strategies, these procedures are only indicated for use in otherwise healthy knees.¹⁷

Several groups have investigated osteochondral grafting in large animal models, both to expand the basic science knowledge of parameters impacting graft function^38,43-45 and to repair naturally occurring defects in companion animals¹⁰ and zoological specimens.²³ In these studies, close inspection of grafted tissue after implantation has revealed several limitations. For instance, Kleemann et al²⁸ performed an osteochondral autograft procedure on the weightbearing surface of femoral condyles in an ovine model and found reduction in cartilage mechanical properties 3 months after implantation, as well as abnormally fibrillated graft edges in both autograft and adjacent tissue. Similarly, in a caprine model of an osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT) procedure, Raub et al⁴⁹ found significant degenerative structural changes in the graft tissue. While observing healing of subchondral bone, Tibesku et al⁵⁸ also observed poorly healed and degenerated cartilage after an OAT procedure in sheep. And in a porcine model, osteochondral autografts show poor cartilage integration with the surrounding tissue.²²

OAT procedures, even in the most ideal surgical scenario, are inherently traumatic to cartilage and other joint tissues. Despite the excellent primary stability that press-fitting of grafts provides,¹³ the forces involved in graft placement may be deleterious to the health of the cartilage.^25,61 Not only does the osteochondral graft undergo potentially damaging loading during the process of implantation, but also initial surgical insult likely produces a joint-wide inflammatory response. Inflammation is one of the critical drivers of joint pathology after joint injury¹⁹ and a major driver of chronic pain and progression in OA.^35,41,50 Active inflammation can also inhibit the repair process and limit the efficacy of biological restoration strategies.^15,20,36,39 Catabolic cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) present in an inflamed joint degrade native extracellular matrix (ECM) and can prevent normal chondrogenic differentiation.⁶⁰

Several molecules with potentially disease-modifying properties have been explored for the treatment of inflammation associated with joint injury.^6,24,27 One cytokine to target, interleukin-1β (IL-1β),¹⁴ is associated with both chronic and acute joint injury.² IL-1β is upregulated in osteoarthritic knees^35,50 and in the synovial fluid of human patients after osteochondral allograft procedures.⁴ Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) competes with IL-1β for binding sites, blocking downstream signaling.²⁷ Anakinra, a recombinant IL1-Ra, has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and autoinflammatory syndromes and is often used off-label for the treatment of inflammation in gout flares.⁵¹ It has been investigated for the treatment of inflammation associated with OA.²⁷ In a canine model of surgically induced cruciate ligament rupture, Anakinra treatment reduced macroscopic and histological evidence of OA progression in the knee at an early (4-week) time point,⁷ and in a human trial, Anakinra administration after an acute anterior cruciate ligament injury significantly improved the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score compared with placebo.²⁹

Given these findings, in this study, we examined the effects of adjuvant therapy (intra-articular injection of recombinant IL1-Ra [Anakinra]) after an OAT procedure on the weightbearing surface of the medial femoral condyle in the porcine stifle joint. Our goal was to determine whether such adjuvant therapies could improve the function of the graft tissue and ameliorate inflammatory changes to the operated joint overall. To assess this, we investigated synovial pathology, cartilage mechanics, subchondral bone healing, and osteochondral histopathology 5 weeks after surgery, both with and without Anakinra treatment.

Methods

Surgical Methods and Joint Injections

This study received approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Pennsylvania. Surgery was performed unilaterally in 11 skeletally mature (12-month-old) Yucatan minipigs. A medial parapatellar arthrotomy was followed by patellar subluxation and hyperflexion of the stifle to allow for visualization of the medial femoral condyle. Next, a 6 mm–diameter × 10 mm–depth defect was created on the medial femoral condyle using a standard Arthrex OAT kit. A second defect, 7 mm in diameter × 10 mm in depth, was created, and the resulting osteochondral plug was press-fit into the first defect. Efforts were made to ensure congruence between the cartilage surfaces of the defect site and recipient plug, matching both surface curvature and defect depth. The empty 7-mm donor site served as a negative empty control. Each defect was made on the weightbearing midline of the medial femoral condyle, and their relative positions proximal or distal were alternated between subjects. Animals were singly housed on nonslip mats postoperatively, allowed unrestricted weightbearing as tolerated, and monitored daily for signs of pain and discomfort by laboratory animal veterinarians, with analgesia given as needed. Postoperative lameness resolved in all animals by the study endpoint. In a subset (n = 6) of animals, beginning 1 week after surgery, 8 mg Anakinra was injected intra-articularly in a saline carrier (1 mL) into the operative stifles of sedated animals on a weekly basis for 4 weeks. Animals were sacrificed 5 weeks after surgery (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Experimental design. All animals underwent a unilateral osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT) procedure on the medial femoral condyle. A 7 mm–diameter by approximately 10 mm–height donor plug was harvested and press-fit into a 6 mm–diameter by approximately 10 mm–deep recipient defect. The donor site was left empty. The relative positions of each site distal or proximal on the medial femoral condyle were alternated between cases. For the Anakinra group, beginning 1 week after surgery, sedated animals received a weekly intra-articular injection of 8 mg Anakinra in a 1-mL saline carrier into the operative stifle. All animals were sacrificed 5 weeks after surgery. Image partially created using BioRender.

Synovial Histopathology

After sacrifice, both operative and contralateral stifle joints were dissected, and synovial tissue was isolated from the joint lining along the distal edge of the patella. Synovium was then fixed in neutral buffered formalin, paraffin processed, and sectioned (to 7-micron thickness). Tissues were then stained with hematoxylin and eosin and imaged at ×10 using a Zeiss Axio Scan.Z1 slide scanner. Four fields of view from each slide were scored by 4 blinded observers (B.D.S., R.A.F., E.R.B., L.G.L.) for synovial pathology with parameters of lining hyperplasia, fibrosis, inflammation, and vasculature according to a modified version of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) histopathology scoring system.^34,52

Cartilage Mechanics

Osteochondral segments of the central portion of each medial femoral condyle were isolated. Specimens were potted using Field metal—a low melting temperature alloy containing bismuth, indium, and tin—with the cartilage surface facing up. A custom indention setup in conjunction with an Instron 5948 electromechanical test frame was used to apply a creep load of 0.1 N with a 2 mm–diameter spherical indenter. The load was held constant for 900 seconds while displacement was recorded. Specimens were tested in a phosphate-buffered saline bath at room temperature. Indentation creep tests were performed in the center of each autograft or empty defect as well as 5 mm adjacent to the edge of each defect. Contralateral medial femoral condyles were tested similarly at a location corresponding to the autograft location in the operative stifle. Resulting deformation curves were fitted to a Hertzian biphasic analytical model, and material parameters of compressive modulus (E_y_–), tensile modulus (E_y₊), and zero-strain permeability (k₀) were computed.⁴⁰

Micro–Computed Tomography

To assess bony features, after mechanical testing, each osteochondral specimen was fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and then scanned via micro–computed tomography (microCT; Scanco µCT 50) at 70 kVp, 85 µA, with a voxel size of 10.3 µm. DICOM files were imported into Dragonfly analysis software (Comet Group). Each empty defect and autograft repair was assigned a standardized cylindrical region of interest (ROI) 4 mm in diameter and 5 mm in height oriented parallel to the long axis of the defect and 1 mm below the surface of the bone-cartilage interface (see Figure 6, A and B). The built-in bone analysis tool in Dragonfly was used to compute bone volume fraction in each of these ROIs. After the initial scan was obtained, specimens were immersed in Lugol solution (10% KI, 5% I₂ in water) for 24 hours to increase the radiopacity of the cartilage. Specimens were then rescanned via microCT with the same parameters as the first scan.

Osteochondral Histology

Medial femoral condyle osteochondral specimens were decalcified by immersion in Formical-2000 for 5 weeks with weekly solution changes, and the paraffin was processed. Specimens were embedded such that the sectioning plane was oriented sagittally. Ten-micron sections were cut through the width of each autograft and empty defect. Sections taken from the center of each defect were stained with either safranin O and fast green or picrosirius red and imaged at ×10 under brightfield using a Zeiss Axio Scan.Z1 slide scanner. Picrosirius red–stained slides were also imaged under polarized light using a Zeiss Axio Scan.Z1 slide scanner. Safranin O/fast green images were cropped to only show empty or autograft repair tissue (see Figure 5, A and B) and were scored by 4 blinded observers (B.D.S., R.A.F., E.R.B., L.G.L.) using the OARSI histopathology scoring system.³⁴ The mean of the independent scores of the 4 observers was computed for each slide for each parameter.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were computed using Microsoft Excel. All other statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism Version 10. Statistical outliers were detected and excluded using the ROUT method with a Q value of 1%. Comparisons between testing sites (autograft center and adjacent, empty defect center and adjacent, and contralateral) for mechanical testing parameters were computed using a 2-way analysis of variance separately for untreated and Anakinra-treated cohorts. Post hoc Tukey tests were used for pairwise comparisons where significant effects were found (α = .05). A Student t test (2-tailed, unpaired) was used to determine differences between untreated and Anakinra-treated specimens or between operative and contralateral limbs within each treatment group, with statistical significance set at a P value ≤.05 for all other quantitative results.

Results

Surgical Outcomes

One subject in the Anakinra-treated group was eliminated from further cartilage analysis due to cartilage-bone delamination of the graft that occurred during surgery. Otherwise, no other complications occurred. All animals in this study recovered uneventfully from surgery, with pain managed well by the standard course of analgesics provided postsurgery, and reached their intended time points 5 weeks after surgery.

Synovial Histopathology

Synovium sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin to visualize cell and tissue morphology (Figure 2, A-C) and scored for synovial pathology (inflammation, hyperplasia, vasculature, and fibrosis). Scores were averaged among graders and fields of view yielding a single score per parameter for each specimen. Interrater reliability was determined to be between moderate and strong agreement among graders (see Supplemental Table 1). Scores are presented as change from contralateral, computed by subtracting the mean score for the contralateral stifles from each experimental animal (untreated or Anakinra-treated) (Figure 2, D-G). In untreated animals, the score for lining hyperplasia was significantly higher in operative stifles compared with contralateral (P = .0022), and while elevated, this increase did not reach statistical significance in Anakinra-treated subjects (P = .119). The increase from contralateral was significantly (P = .022) greater without Anakinra treatment (Figure 2D). The fibrosis parameter was unchanged from contralateral in both groups (Figure 2E). Synovium from operative stifles had significantly more inflammatory cell infiltration compared with contralateral in untreated animals (P = .011). While this metric was again elevated, the increase did not reach statistical significance with Anakinra treatment (P = .058). The increase from contralateral was significantly greater (P = .04) in untreated stifles compared with treated (Figure 2F). Similarly, the vascular score significantly increased in the operative stifle compared with contralateral in untreated joints (P = .028), while the increase was not statistically significant in Anakinra-treated joints (P = .088). However, when comparing the change from contralateral between Anakinra-treated and untreated joints, there was no statistically significant difference (P = .36) between groups (Figure 2G).

Figure 2.

(A-C) Representative hematoxylin and eosin–stained synovium sections from contralateral stifle joints, operated stifles without Anakinra treatment, and operated stifles with weekly intra-articular Anakinra. Scale bar = 100 µm. (D-G) Synovial histopathology scores for lining hyperplasia (D), subintimal fibrosis (E), inflammation (F), and vasculature (G) in operative stifles 5 weeks after surgery, expressed as an increase relative to the contralateral baseline. # = statistically significant difference from contralateral baseline; +/– = with or without IL1-ra administration.

Cartilage Mechanics

The material parameters of compressive modulus (E_y_–), tensile modulus (E_y₊), and zero-strain permeability (k₀) were computed for each testing location by fitting the indentation creep deformation curve to a Hertzian biphasic analytical model.⁴⁰ The contralateral means of these parameters for each treatment group were computed and used to normalize results in the operative stifle as the fraction of contralateral. The compressive modulus of the autograft cartilage in untreated stifles was 39.5% ± 10.2% of contralateral, while in Anakinra-treated stifles it was 63.1% ± 20.8% of contralateral. The tensile modulus of the autograft cartilage in untreated stifles was 28.2% ± 12.1% of contralateral cartilage—significantly less (P < .0001) than in Anakinra-treated stifles (128.8% ± 23.6% of contralateral). Zero-strain permeability in untreated stifles was 183.9% ± 104.4% of contralateral—significantly elevated (P = .02) in comparison with that of Anakinra-treated stifles (44.2% ± 28.2% of contralateral) (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Cartilage mechanical properties in the center of each osteochondral autograft plug 5 weeks after surgical implantation, expressed as a fraction of the contralateral stifle (dashed line). +/– = with or without IL1-ra administration.

In terms of absolute values before normalization, in the absence of Anakinra treatment, autograft cartilage had significantly lower (P = .0031) compressive modulus than contralateral cartilage (0.49 ± 0.13 MPa vs 1.25 ± 0.33 MPa). Similarly, tensile modulus was significantly reduced (P = .0085, 3.59 ± 1.54 MPa vs 12.73 ± 5.43 MPa). Permeability did not show a significant change (0.0081 ± 0.0046 mm⁴/Ns vs 0.0054 ± 0.0054 mm⁴/Ns). With anakinra treatment, only compressive modulus was significantly reduced (P = .029) in autograft cartilage in comparison with contralateral (0.93 ± 0.31 MPa vs 1.48 ± 0.35 MPa). Tensile modulus and permeability were unchanged compared to contralateral with Anakinra treatment (Supplemental Figure S1).

Unsurprisingly, the tissue filling the empty defects at 5 weeks was significantly softer and more permeable across all parameters and treatment groups in comparison with the corresponding contralateral cartilage (Supplemental Figure S1). However, when comparing empty defect tissue between untreated and Anakinra-treated stifles as a fraction of the contralateral, infill tissue in Anakinra-treated stifles was significantly stiffer than untreated (P = .0015; 35.9% ± 16.1% vs 3.1% ± 1.7%) (Supplemental Figure S2).

Osteochondral Histology

Sagittal sections through the autograft and empty defects on each medial femoral condyle were stained with safranin O and fast green to visualize ECM and tissue structure (Figure 4, A and B; Supplemental Figure S5). Qualitatively, regardless of treatment group, bony integration of autografts was excellent, with few if any discontinuities along the bony margin. However, graft edges were still plainly visible in the cartilage region, with some loss of proteoglycan content and mild surface roughening (especially in untreated stifles). Picrosirius red staining showed collagen content and structure (Figure 4, C and D), which again exhibited tissue discontinuity in the cartilage layer between the autograft and adjacent cartilage. When imaged with polarized light (Figure 4, E and F), which allows for the visualization of collagen architecture and organization, it was evident that the tissue was more disorganized toward the defect edges, as well as across the superficial layer of the autograft cartilage. This disorganization appeared to progress deeper into the cartilage tissue in untreated specimens compared to those treated with Anakinra. As expected, empty defects healed poorly at this time point, with the defect fill consisting largely of disorganized, collagen-rich fibrous tissue and little to no proteoglycan content. Notably, however, new bone deposition appeared to have been accelerated in empty defects with Anakinra treatment (Supplemental Figure S3).

Figure 4.

(A and B) Representative safranin O– and fast green–stained medial femoral condyle sections from untreated and Anakinra-treated stifles at the midplane of each autograft. (C and D) Picrosirius red–stained medial femoral condyle sections imaged under brightfield. (E and F) Picrosirius red–stained medial femoral condyle sections imaged under polarized light. Scale bar = 5 mm.

Safranin O– and fast green–stained images were cropped to show only the center of each autograft for scoring using the OARSI histopathology scoring system³⁴ by 4 trained and blinded observers (B.D.S., R.A.F., E.R.B., L.G.L.) (Figure 5, A and B). Interrater reliability was determined to be between strong and perfect agreement among graders (see Supplemental Table 1). This analysis yielded scores for 5 parameters: structure, interterritorial safranin O, chondrocyte density, cell cloning, and tidemark. The sum of these parameters was computed as the total histopathology score for each specimen, with higher numbers corresponding to a greater degree of degeneration. The total score was significantly higher (indicating more degeneration) for autografts in untreated stifles in comparison to those in Anakinra-treated joints (P = .0043; 9.95 ± 1.47 vs 5.35 ± 2.15, out of a maximum score of 25) (Figure 5C). The difference was readily apparent in the structure subscore (P = .0001; 3.50 ± 0.40 vs 1.35 ± 0.55, out of 10) (Figure 5D) and in the safranin O staining intensity score (P = .014; 1.95 ± 0.72 vs 0.70 ± 0.54, out of 4) (Figure 5E), as well as in the tidemark assessment subscore (P = .013; 1.50 ± 0.40 vs 0.50 ± 0.59, out of 3) (Figure 5H). There were no significant differences in either chondrocyte density (Figure 5F) or cell cloning (Figure 5G) subscores.

Figure 5.

(A and B) Representative safranin O– and fast green–stained medial femoral condyle sections from untreated and Anakinra-treated stifles cropped and zoomed for scoring of the center of each autograft. Scale bar = 1 mm. (C) Total Osteoarthritis Research Society International histopathology score. (D-H) Sum of subscores for structure, safranin O staining intensity, chondrocyte density, cell cloning, and tidemark. +/– = with or without IL1-ra administration.

Micro-Computed Tomography

Three-dimensional microCT reconstructions of the operative medial femoral condyles showed excellent autograft retention and shape conformation, regardless of treatment group (Figure 6, A and B). Similarly, 2-dimensional slices across the center of each autograft demonstrated fully integrated osseus tissue at this 5-week time point, both with and without Anakinra treatment. This was reflected in the calculation of bone volume fraction within the autograft (P = .22; 0.49 ± 0.083 for untreated vs 0.44 ± 0.055 for Anakinra treated) (Figure 6C). There appeared to be more new bone formation in the empty defects of Anakinra-treated stifles, which was confirmed via calculation of the bone volume fraction (P = .0031; 0.019 ± 0.02 for untreated vs 0.18 ± 0.09 for Anakinra treated) (Figure 6D).

Figure 6.

(A and B) Representative 3-dimensional renderings of the medial femoral condyle and sagittal 2-dimensional cross sections of autografts and empty defects for untreated and Anakinra-treated stifles. Scale bar = 5 mm. (C and D) Bone volume fraction within a cylindrical region of interest 4 mm in diameter and 5 mm in height beginning approximately 1 mm below the bone-cartilage interface in the center of each autograft and empty defect. BV, bone volume; TV, total volume; +/– = with or without IL1-ra administration.

Discussion

The goal of this study was to determine whether an adjuvant therapy, in this case intra-articular injection of recombinant IL1-ra (Anakinra), after an OAT procedure could enhance repair and ameliorate degenerative changes to graft tissue and improve overall joint health after surgery. We hypothesized that by blocking IL-1β signaling in the postoperative period, the deleterious effects of joint inflammation on healing could be attenuated. Our results show that, at an early 5-week time point, synovial pathology was significantly reduced in operative stifles receiving IL1-ra treatment in comparison with untreated controls. This is consistent with prior work from our group that showed that synovial explants from client-owned canines presenting with cruciate ligament injury displayed numerous histological and gene expression signatures of inflammatory pathology, but when these explants were treated with IL-1ra in culture, this inflammatory phenotype was significantly attenuated.³³

Synovial pathology, and the concurrent joint-wide inflammation that it implies, is a major signature of the degenerative changes that presage OA⁵⁰ and may contribute directly to cartilage degradation through MMP-mediated catabolism.^26,55 While MMPs play a role in normal cartilage tissue homeostasis, the upregulation that accompanies joint inflammation results in catabolic matrix degradation in the cartilage, and IL-1β (as well as other inflammatory cytokines) is a major contributor to the overexpression of MMP enzymes in injured and inflamed joints.^26,55 In vitro experiments clearly demonstrate the negative effects of IL-1β on the ECM content, structure, and integration potential of cartilage tissue,^12,39 which may be rescued with IL-1ra treatment.⁴⁸

This may help explain some of the most striking results in the current study. First, indentation creep testing showed that autografts better maintained their functional integrity in IL-1ra–treated operative stifles compared with untreated controls. This result was especially noteworthy in the parameters of tensile modulus and permeability, the former of which is directly related to the integrity of the collagen network in the superficial zone of cartilage.⁵³ Evaluation of the osteochondral histology, both qualitatively and quantitatively (via the structure OARSI subscore), clearly indicates that superficial zone structural perturbations are more pronounced in the autografts of untreated joints. Furthermore, with IL-1ra treatment, proteoglycan content (measured through safranin O staining) was better maintained. This combination implies a collagen matrix–preserving (or ECM deposition–promoting) effect of IL-1ra treatment after osteochondral autografting. This finding is further evidenced by analysis of the tissue ingrowth into the empty donor site defects. Picrosirius red–stained histological sections showed highly collagenous fibrous tissue infill in empty defects, and while still far below the contralateral baseline, mechanical testing revealed that this tissue was significantly stiffer in IL-1ra–treated joints in comparison with untreated. A recent study from our group in the context of annulus fibrosis repair showed that fibrous scar formation at the injury site was significantly greater with local IL-1ra release.⁴⁷ However, this direct or indirect influence on collagen network turnover leading to growth of fibrous tissue may not always be desirable, especially in the context of cartilage repair, and the potential negative consequences of this phenomenon will require careful study.

The same inflammatory cytokines that spur cartilage degradation may also adversely impact bone healing.^27,30 Rapid osseus integration is vital to the survival of osteochondral grafts,⁹ and abnormal bone healing, including subchondral and basal cyst formation and communication between the joint space and underlying bone, has been implicated in osteochondral graft failure.⁴⁶ Inadequate closure of the subchondral plate has been implicated as a major driver in donor site morbidity in osteochondral autograft procedures.⁴² Incomplete lateral integration between mating cartilage surfaces may allow communication between the joint space (and its cytokine-containing synovial fluid) and the subchondral bone, which may be a mechanism of bone cyst formation.⁴⁶ We did not observe any evidence of subchondral or basal bone cysts in any of our specimens, which is perhaps unsurprising given the early time point. However, in the autografts of our untreated control group we did observe histological evidence of abnormalities in the subchondral bone plate as shown by the elevated tidemark score. Interestingly, this was significantly improved in our Anakinra-treated group. There is evidence in the literature that IL-1ra may enhance bone healing. For instance, Lackington et al^31,32 showed that IL1-ra delivery rescues the osteogenic potential of mesenchymal stromal cells cultured in the presence of IL-1β and, in a follow-up in vivo study, showed that IL-1ra enhanced the efficacy of recombinant human bone morphogenic protein–2 in a femoral defect model of bone healing in a rat. Our data support the hypothesis that IL-1ra enhances bone healing. As evidenced by our microCT results, the empty defects from Anakinra-treated stifle joints show significantly more bony deposition than those of untreated controls, which may improve and accelerate osteointegration of the autografts. Additional early time points, coupled with quantitative assessment of bone formation rates,^63,64 will be required to assess this impact of IL-1ra on the rate of autograft bony integration.

Several prior studies have investigated adjuvant therapeutics applied either during surgery or in the immediate postoperative period in the context of osteochondral repair in large animal models. Tibesku et al⁵⁷ found that intra-articular administration of hepatocyte growth factor after an OAT procedure in sheep produced less histological evidence of abnormal cell cloning in the graft cartilage compared with untreated control knees, with more subtle improvements in other histological outcomes. Siebert et al⁵⁴ performed an OAT procedure on the femoral condyles of sheep, with experimental grafts bathed in either basic fibroblast growth factor or bone morphogenic protein–2 before reimplantation, and found accelerated osseus integration with either growth factor in comparison to controls, but no differences in cartilage healing. Stefani et al⁵⁶ implanted an acellular dexamethasone-eluting graft into the autograft donor site during an OAT procedure in a canine model and observed improved functional outcomes and osteochondral healing but no differences in synovial fluid cytokine content compared with controls. They postulated the main effect of treatment to be pro-anabolic as opposed to anti-inflammatory.

Several limitations of this study will inform future directions. While we have shown promising results in the potential of intra-articular IL-1ra to enhance graft function in an in vivo model of osteochondral repair, we have not optimized the dosing regimen. Anakinra has a relatively short half-life systemically,²⁶ and the pharmacokinetics of this molecule in the joint environment is not fully understood. Furthermore, we do not know the durability of repair, and whether the protective effect of treatment on graft integrity is transient, necessitating longer endpoints in future studies. Should this be the case, we could consider inclusion of IL-1ra in drug delivery vehicles to prolong joint residence time.^47,48,63 Although these data support several hypotheses related to the mechanism of action leading to the marked improvements in graft function that we observed with IL-1ra treatment (reduction of inflammatory cytokine-driven catabolism and improved bone integration), experiments to specifically test these hypotheses in the appropriate time window will be required. Moreover, longer-term endpoints will be necessary to evaluate functional and behavioral outcomes such as pain, gait, and general activity, and differences between treatment groups may not become measurable until later time points. Future studies will also be required to evaluate and monitor off-target effects of intra-articular Anakinra treatment. Finally, although our intra-articular injection volume was small (1 mL), and we do not expect a response from the injection itself, we did not compare either of our experimental groups to saline carrier control. With regard to clinical relevance, there are several additional limitations to this study. Unlike humans, animals were allowed unrestricted weightbearing as tolerated immediately after surgery. Despite this, all implants remained well in place in both study cohorts; however, this early resumption of load-bearing activity may have influenced graft outcomes.

The results of this study show that adjuvant anti-inflammatory therapeutics delivered directly to a knee joint after an osteochondral repair procedure have the potential to enhance graft integrity and improve repair outcomes. This may not only enhance the results of osteochondral repair procedures as they are performed currently but may also expand indications for such treatments to a greater population of patients. OAT (and indeed all biological repair techniques) is currently only performed in near-ideal surgical scenarios, and patients with other comorbidities (including inflammatory conditions and OA) are nearly always excluded.³⁷ This “red knee” population, which represents the vast majority of patients receiving care for knee joint injury and degeneration, is currently treated palliatively, and many will eventually require a total knee replacement.³⁷ Adjuvant therapeutics such as the one described in this study may allow these patients to become candidates for the most advanced biological repair strategies, from which they are currently excluded.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-ajs-10.1177_03635465251401225 – Supplemental material for Intra-articular Delivery of Recombinant Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist Protein (Anakinra) Enhances Graft Function in a Porcine Model of Osteochondral Repair

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-ajs-10.1177_03635465251401225 for Intra-articular Delivery of Recombinant Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist Protein (Anakinra) Enhances Graft Function in a Porcine Model of Osteochondral Repair by Brendan D. Stoeckl, Rachel A. Flaugh, Akbar N. Syed, Kendall M. Masada, Elizabeth R. Bernstein, Elisabeth A. Lemmon, Austin C. Jenk, Lorielle G. Laforest, Natalie L. Fogarty, Bijan Dehghani, Carla R. Scanzello, James L. Carey, David R. Steinberg and Robert L. Mauck in The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Footnotes

Submitted June 12, 2025; accepted October 28, 2025.

One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: K.M.M. has received hospitality payments from Stryker and support for education from Paladin Technology Solutions. B.D. has received support for education from Paladin Technology Solutions. J.L.C. has received consulting fees and honoraria from Vericel Corporation; compensation for services other than consulting from Arthrex; consulting fees from Bioventus and Joint Restoration Foundation Inc; and he is an associate editor for AJSM. D.R.S. has received consulting fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Pennsylvania (Protocol No. 805077).

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (P30 AR069619) and the Department of Veterans Affairs (Merit Award I01 RX003375 and the CReATE Motion Center I50 RX004845).

ORCID iDs

Brendan D. Stoeckl

Austin C. Jenk

David R. Steinberg

Robert L. Mauck

References

Bayliss

Culliford

Monk

, et al. The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2017;389(10077):1424-1430.

Bleedorn

Greuel

Manley

, et al. Synovitis in dogs with stable stifle joints and incipient cranial cruciate ligament rupture: a cross-sectional study. Vet Surg. 2011;40(5):531-543.

Bugbee

Pallante-Kichura

Görtz

Amiel

Sah

. Osteochondral allograft transplantation in cartilage repair: graft storage paradigm, translational models, and clinical applications. J Orthop Res. 2016;34(1):31-38.

Carballo

Eliasberg

Khilnani

, et al. Local and systemic immunologic response to osteochondral allografts: a prospective study with one-year follow-up. Paper presented at: Orthopaedic Research Society Annual Meeting; February 7-11, 2025; Phoenix, AZ. https://www.ors.org/wp-content/uploads/AM25/147.pdf

Carey

. Fibrocartilage following microfracture is not as robust as native articular cartilage: commentary on an article by Aaron J. Krych, MD, et al.: “Activity levels are higher after osteochondral autograft transfer mosaicplasty than after microfracture for articular cartilage defects of the knee. A retrospective comparative study”. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(11):e80.

Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan

. The current role of disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2023;11(1):11-22.

Caron

Fernandes

Martel-Pelletier

, et al. Chondroprotective effect of intraarticular injections of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in experimental osteoarthritis: suppression of collagenase-1 expression. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39(9):1535-1544.

Chahla

Williams

Yanke

Farr

. The large focal isolated chondral lesion. J Knee Surg. 2023;36(4):368-381.

Chan

Liu

Semler

, et al. Association of 3-dimensional cartilage and bone structure with articular cartilage properties in and adjacent to autologous osteochondral grafts after 6 and 12 months in a goat model. Cartilage. 2012;3(3):255-266.

10.

Cook

Hudson

Kuroki

. Autogenous osteochondral grafting for treatment of stifle osteochondrosis in dogs. Vet Surg. 2008;37(4):311-321.

11.

Devitt

Bell

Webster

Feller

Whitehead

. Surgical treatments of cartilage defects of the knee: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Knee. 2017;24(3):508-517.

12.

Djouad

Rackwitz

Song

Janjanin

Tuan

. ERK1/2 activation induced by inflammatory cytokines compromises effective host tissue integration of engineered cartilage. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15(10):2825-2835.

13.

Duchow

Hess

Kohn

. Primary stability of press-fit-implanted osteochondral grafts: influence of graft size, repeated insertion, and harvesting technique. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(1):24-27.

14.

Fields

Günther

Sundberg

. Structural basis of IL-1 family cytokine signaling. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1412.

15.

Goldring

Otero

Plumb

, et al. Roles of inflammatory and anabolic cytokines in cartilage metabolism: signals and multiple effectors converge upon MMP-13 regulation in osteoarthritis. Eur Cell Mater. 2011;21:202-220.

16.

Gomoll

. Microfracture and augments. J Knee Surg. 2012;25(1):9-15.

17.

Gomoll

Farr

Gillogly

Kercher

Minas

. Surgical management of articular cartilage defects of the knee. Instr Course Lect. 2011;60:461-483.

18.

Gomoll

Minas

. The quality of healing: articular cartilage. Wound Repair Regen. 2014;22(Suppl 1):30-38.

19.

Griffin

Scanzello

. Innate inflammation and synovial macrophages in osteoarthritis pathophysiology. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019;37(5) Suppl 120(5):57-63.

20.

Guilak

Fermor

Keefe

, et al. The role of biomechanics and inflammation in cartilage injury and repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;423:17-26.

21.

Hangody

Kish

Kárpáti

Szerb

Udvarhelyi

. Arthroscopic autogenous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of femoral condylar articular defects: a preliminary report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1997;5(4):262-267.

22.

Harman

Weeden

Lichota

Brindley

. Osteochondral autograft transplantation in the porcine knee. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(6):913-918.

23.

Huckins

Chinnadurai

Ivančić

, et al. Osteochondral autograft transfer for treatment of stifle osteochondritis dissecans in two related snow leopards (Panthera uncia). J Zoo Wildl Med. 2018;49(3):788-793.

24.

Jones

Togashi

Wilson

Heckmann

Vangsness

. Intra-articular treatment options for knee osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2019;15(2):77-90.

25.

Kang

Friel

Williams

Cole

Wimmer

. Effect of impaction sequence on osteochondral graft damage: the role of repeated and varying loads. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(1):105-113.

26.

Kapoor

Martel-Pelletier

Lajeunesse

Pelletier

Fahmi

. Role of proinflammatory cytokines in the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011;7(1):33-42.

27.

Khella

Horvath

Asgarian

Rolauffs

Hart

. Anti-inflammatory therapeutic approaches to prevent or delay post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) of the knee joint with a focus on sustained delivery approaches. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(15):8005.

28.

Kleemann

Schell

Thompson

Epari

Duda

Weiler

. Mechanical behavior of articular cartilage after osteochondral autograft transfer in an ovine model. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(4):555-563.

29.

Kraus

Birmingham

Stabler

, et al. Effects of intraarticular IL1-Ra for acute anterior cruciate ligament knee injury: a randomized controlled pilot trial (NCT00332254). Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20(4):271-278.

30.

Kushioka

Chow

SKH

Toya

, et al. Bone regeneration in inflammation with aging and cell-based immunomodulatory therapy. Inflamm Regen. 2023;43(1):29.

31.

Lackington

Gehweiler

Zhao

, et al. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist enhances the therapeutic efficacy of a low dose of rhBMP-2 in a weight-bearing rat femoral defect model. Acta Biomater. 2022;149:189-197.

32.

Lackington

Gomez-Sierra

González-Vázquez

O’Brien

Stoddart

Thompson

. Non-viral gene delivery of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist using collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffold protects rat BM-MSCs from IL-1β-mediated inhibition of osteogenesis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:582012.

33.

Lemmon

Burt

Kim

, et al. Interleukin receptor therapeutics attenuate inflammation in canine synovium following cruciate ligament injury. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2024;32(10):1295-1307.

34.

Little

Smith

Cake

Read

Murphy

Barry

. The OARSI histopathology initiative—recommendations for histological assessments of osteoarthritis in sheep and goats. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18(suppl 3):S80-S92.

35.

Liu-Bryan

Terkeltaub

. Emerging regulators of the inflammatory process in osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015;11(1):35-44.

36.

Lotz

. Cytokines in cartilage injury and repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;391(Suppl):S108-S115.

37.

Martín

Patel

Zlotnick

Carey

Mauck

. Emerging therapies for cartilage regeneration in currently excluded ‘red knee’ populations. NPJ Regen Med. 2019;4(1):12.

38.

McCarty

Fader

Mitchell

Glenn

Potter

Spindler

. Fresh osteochondral allograft versus autograft: twelve-month results in isolated canine knee defects. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(9):2354-236.

39.

Mohanraj

Huang

Yeger-McKeever

Schmidt

Dodge

Mauck

. Chondrocyte and mesenchymal stem cell derived engineered cartilage exhibits differential sensitivity to pro-inflammatory cytokines. J Orthop Res. 2018;36(11):2901-2910.

40.

Moore

DeLucca

Elliott

Burris

. Quantifying cartilage contact modulus, tension modulus, and permeability with Hertzian biphasic creep. J Tribol. 2016;138(4):0414051-414057.

41.

Neogi

Guermazi

Roemer

, et al. Association of joint inflammation with pain sensitization in knee osteoarthritis: the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(3):654-661.

42.

Nosewicz

Reilingh

van Dijk

Duda

Schell

. Weightbearing ovine osteochondral defects heal with inadequate subchondral bone plate restoration: implications regarding osteochondral autograft harvesting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(10):1923-1930.

43.

Pallante

Chen

Ball

, et al. The in vivo performance of osteochondral allografts in the goat is diminished with extended storage and decreased cartilage cellularity. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(8):1814-1823.

44.

Pallante

Görtz

Chen

, et al. Treatment of articular cartilage defects in the goat with frozen versus fresh osteochondral allografts: effects on cartilage stiffness, zonal composition, and structure at six months. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(21):1984-1995.

45.

Pallante-Kichura

Chen

Temple-Wong

Bugbee

Sah

. In vivo efficacy of fresh versus frozen osteochondral allografts in the goat at 6 months is associated with PRG4 secretion. J Orthop Res. 2013;31(6):880-886.

46.

Pallante-Kichura

Cory

Bugbee

Sah

. Bone cysts after osteochondral allograft repair of cartilage defects in goats suggest abnormal interaction between subchondral bone and overlying synovial joint tissues. Bone. 2013;57(1):259-268.

47.

Peredo

Gullbrand

Friday

, et al. Tension-activated nanofiber patches delivering an anti-inflammatory drug improve repair in a goat intervertebral disc herniation model. Sci Transl Med. 2023;15(722):eadf1690.

48.

Peredo

Duan

Dodge

Lee

Mauck

. Mechano-activated biomolecule release in regenerating load-bearing tissue microenvironments. Biomaterials. 2021;265:120255.

49.

Raub

Hsu

Chan

, et al. Microstructural remodeling of articular cartilage following defect repair by osteochondral autograft transfer. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21(6):860-868.

50.

Robinson

Lepus

Wang

, et al. Low-grade inflammation as a key mediator of the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016;12(10):580-592.

51.

Saag

Khanna

Keenan

, et al. A randomized, phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of anakinra in the treatment of gout flares. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021;73(8):1533-1542.

52.

Scanzello

Albert

DiCarlo

, et al. The influence of synovial inflammation and hyperplasia on symptomatic outcomes up to 2 years post-operatively in patients undergoing partial meniscectomy. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21(9):1392-1399.

53.

Setton

Elliott

Mow

. Altered mechanics of cartilage with osteoarthritis: human osteoarthritis and an experimental model of joint degeneration. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1999;7(1):2-14.

54.

Siebert

Schneider

Sopka

Wahner

Miltner

Niedhart

. Ingrowth of osteochondral grafts under the influence of growth factors: 6-month results of an animal study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006;126(4):247-252.

55.

Sokolove

Lepus

. Role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis: latest findings and interpretations. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2013;5(2):77-94.

56.

Stefani

Lee

Tan

, et al. Sustained low-dose dexamethasone delivery via a PLGA microsphere-embedded agarose implant for enhanced osteochondral repair. Acta Biomater. 2020;102:326-340.

57.

Tibesku

Daniilidis

Szuwart

Jahn

Schlegel

Fuchs-Winkelmann

. Influence of hepatocyte growth factor on autologous osteochondral transplants in an animal model. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131(8):1145-1151.

58.

Tibesku

Szuwart

Kleffner

, et al. Hyaline cartilage degenerates after autologous osteochondral transplantation. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(6):1210-1214.

59.

Wagner

Kaiser

DeFroda

Meeker

Cole

. Rehabilitation, restrictions, and return to sport after cartilage procedures. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022;4(1):e115-e124.

60.

Wehling

Palmer

Pilapil

, et al. Interleukin-1beta and tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibit chondrogenesis by human mesenchymal stem cells through NF-kappaB-dependent pathways. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(3):801-812.

61.

Whiteside

Jakob

Wyss

Mainil-Varlet

. Impact loading of articular cartilage during transplantation of osteochondral autograft. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(9):1285-1291.

62.

Zheng

Willers

Kirilak

, et al. Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI®): biological and histological assessment. Tissue Eng. 2007;13(4):737-746.

63.

Zlotnick

Locke

Hemdev

, et al. Gravity-based patterning of osteogenic factors to preserve bone structure after osteochondral injury in a large animal model. Biofabrication. 2022;14(4):10.

64.

Zlotnick

Locke

Stoeckl

, et al. Marked differences in local bone remodelling in response to different marrow stimulation techniques in a large animal. Eur Cell Mater. 2021;41:546-555.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

6.63 MB