Abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses offer an efficient way to digest the full text, however; abstracts that contain spin, defined as reporting greater efficacy or safety of the experimental treatment than is supported by the results, can negatively affect clinical decisions.
Purpose/Hypothesis:
The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze the incidence and types of spin present in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of trochleoplasty procedures while also determining if any identifiable patterns of spin exist. It was hypothesized that abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on trochleoplasty would contain spin elements.
Study Design:
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods:
This study was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Peer-reviewed articles were collected from the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases as of January 2025. Inclusion criteria were systematic reviews or meta-analyses assessing trochleoplasty. Quality was assessed using AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews Version 2). Two independent authors examined the incidence of the 15 most severe categories of spin. The Fisher exact test with a 95% confidence interval was used to examine associations between spin type and various study characteristics.
Results:
Twenty studies met inclusion criteria, and 9 were meta-analyses. All studies contained at least 1 type of spin (median, 1; range, 1-5). There were no significant associations between spin type or study characteristics, including PRISMA adherence. The most common type of spin was type 5 (conclusion claims the beneficial effect of the experimental treatment despite a high risk of bias in primary studies), which was observed in 10 (50.0%) articles.
Conclusion:
Reporting bias is highly prevalent in many abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on trochleoplasty. When present, spin in the abstracts of the reviewed studies inappropriately favored safety, beneficial effects, and efficacy of the experimental treatment. These findings emphasize the need for clinicians to assess full-text articles regarding trochleoplasty as results presented in abstracts may frequently be misleading. The authors recommend the addition of spin bias evaluation to the PRISMA abstract checklist to help authors recognize and avoid spin in future abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
AljadaanBMAlhakbaniMSAAlmonaieSHCahusacPMB. Outcomes of surgical interventions for patellofemoral instability in the presence of trochlear dysplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2025;53(5):1216-1230. doi:10.1177/03635465241252805
2.
BalcarekPRehnSHowellsNR, et al. Results of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction compared with trochleoplasty plus individual extensor apparatus balancing in patellar instability caused by severe trochlear dysplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(12):3869-3877. doi:10.1007/s00167-016-4365-x
3.
BastianHGlasziouPChalmersI.Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up?PLoS Med. 2010;7(9):e1000326. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000326
4.
BedeirYHDeghidyEAA. Outcomes of trochleoplasty versus tibial tubercle osteotomy for treatment of patellar instability associated with trochlear dysplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Knee Surg. 2025;38(3):154-162. doi:10.1055/a-2430-0192
5.
BellerEMGlasziouPPAltmanDG, et al. PRISMA for abstracts: reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts. PLoS Med. 2013;10(4):e1001419. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001419
6.
BoutronIDuttonSRavaudPAltmanDG.Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes. JAMA. 2010;303(20):2058-64. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.651
7.
CarrMDyeDArthurW, et al. Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses covering treatments for Achilles tendon ruptures. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2021;6(1):247301142 11000637. doi:10.1177/24730114211000637
8.
ChaclasNOrellanaKHuangKAmatoCWilliamsBA.Trochleoplasty in pediatric patients—a systematic review. Iowa Orthop J. 2024;44(2):100-106.
9.
CookDJMulrowCDHaynesRB.Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126(5):376-80. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-126-5-199703010-00006
10.
DaviesMRAllahabadiSDiabTE, et al. Sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty as an isolated or combined treatment strategy for patellar instability and trochlear dysplasia: a systematic review. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020;2(5):e661-e669. doi:10.1016/j.asmr.2020.06.009
11.
DejourHWalchGNove-JosserandLGuierC.Factors of patellar instability: an anatomic radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1994;2(1):19-26. doi:10.1007/BF01552649
12.
Dwi DamayanthiEPinedaTMaruli Tua LubisAArioharjo UtoyoGFi Ahsani Nur AlainaI. Sulcus deepening trochleoplasty versus Bereiter trochleoplasty for high grade trochlear dysplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis for clinical outcome and recurrent instability. Knee. 2023;45:147-155. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2023.10.001
13.
EikaniCKnapikDMVadheraAS, et al. No significant difference in thick versus thin osteochondral flap trochleoplasty in the treatment of trochlear dysplasia: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024;32(5):1168-1178. doi:10.1002/ksa.12108
14.
GalloLYuanMGalloM, et al. Evaluation of “spin” in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of therapeutic interventions published in high-impact plastic surgery journals: a systematic review. Aesthet Surg J. 2022:1332-1342. doi:10.1093/asj/sjac109
15.
GulbrandsenMTFillerRJRiceRC, et al. Spin in the abstracts of meta-analyses and systematic reviews: midshaft clavicle fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2022:e128-e134. doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000002497
16.
HarrisIMouradMKadirASolomonMYoungJ.Publication bias in abstracts presented to the annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. J Orthop Surg. 2007;15(1):62-66. doi:10.1177/230949900701500114
17.
HarrisJDBrandJCCoteMPDhawanA.Research pearls: the significance of statistics and perils of pooling. Part 3: Pearls and pitfalls of meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(8):1594-1602. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2017.01.055
18.
HiemstraLAPetersonDYoussefMSolimanJBanfieldLAyeniOR.Trochleoplasty provides good clinical outcomes and an acceptable complication profile in both short and long-term follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(9):2967-2983. doi:10.1007/s00167-018-5311-x
19.
HwangNMSamuelJTThompsonAA, et al. Reporting bias in the form of positive spin is highly prevalent in abstracts of systematic reviews on primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy. Published online January 1, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2023.12.018
20.
JonesCRulonZArthurW, et al. Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. Published online January 19, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2020.11.026
21.
KimMSHasanLKFathiA, et al. Evaluation of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of superior capsular reconstruction. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022;31(8):1743-1750. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2022.03.015
22.
LeclercJTDartusJLabreucheJ, et al. Complications and outcomes of trochleoplasty for patellofemoral instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1000 trochleoplasties. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021;107(7):103035. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103035
23.
LongoUGBertonASalvatoreG, et al. Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction combined with bony procedures for patellar instability: current indications, outcomes, and complications. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(7):1421-1427. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2016.01.013
24.
LongoUGVincenzoCManneringN, et al. Trochleoplasty techniques provide good clinical results in patients with trochlear dysplasia. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(9):2640-2658. doi:10.1007/s00167-017-4584-9
25.
MarxRGWilsonSMSwiontkowskiMF.Updating the assignment of levels of evidence. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(1):1-2. doi:10.2106/JBJS.N.01112
26.
MoultonSGHartwellMJFeeleyBT.Evaluation of spin bias in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of rotator cuff repair with platelet-rich plasma. Am J Sports Med. 2024;52(13):3412-3418. doi:10.1177/03635465231213039
27.
NolanJEIIISchottelPCEndresNK.Trochleoplasty: indications and technique. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018;11(2):231-240. doi:10.1007/s12178-018-9478-z
28.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71
29.
PhillipsARSinghHHanebergECDanilkowiczRMYankeAB.Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction results in lower failure and complication rates than isolated trochleoplasty and tibial tubercle osteotomy: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. Published online June 4, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.019
30.
PlattBNBowersLCMagnusonJA, et al. Return to sport after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50(1):282-291. doi:10.1177/0363546521990004
31.
ReddyAKShepardSOttwellR, et al. Over 30% of systematic reviews and meta-analyses focused on rotator cuff tear treatments contained spin in the abstract. Arthroscopy. 2021;37(9):2953-2959. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2021.03.066
32.
ReddyKRReddyNS.Trochleoplasty and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation. Indian J Orthop. 2012;46(2):242-245. doi:10.4103/0019-5413.93691
33.
RenBZhangXZhangL, et al. Isolated trochleoplasty for recurrent patellar dislocation has lower outcome and higher residual instability compared with combined MPFL and trochleoplasty: a systematic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139(11):1617-1624. doi:10.1007/s00402-019-03244-1
34.
RongaMOlivaFLongoUGTestaVCapassoGMaffulliN.Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(9):1735-1742. doi:10.1177/0363546509333482
35.
SaintSChristakisDASahaS, et al. Journal reading habits of internists. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(12):881-884. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.00202.x
36.
SheaBJReevesBCWellsG, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008. doi:10.1136/bmj.j4008
SiexPNowlinWOttwellR, et al. Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses covering surgical management, or quality of life after surgical management, of osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2020;2(4):100121. doi:10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100121
39.
SmithTOLeighD. Outcomes following trochleoplasty for patellar instability with trochlear dysplasia: a systematic review. In: Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet]. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 2008. Accessed April 20, 2025. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK75714/
40.
SongGYHongLZhangH, et al. Trochleoplasty versus nontrochleoplasty procedures in treating patellar instability caused by severe trochlear dysplasia. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(4):523-532. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2014.01.011
41.
TanCMPZhuYGuoLLohSYJ. Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with and without trochleoplasty for patients with patella instability—correlation of trochlear dysplasia and patient outcome, classification and outcome measure in the past decade—a systematic review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022;32(4):595-607. doi:10.1007/s00590-021-03030-z
42.
TanSSHLawGWKimSSSethiELimAKSHuiJHP. Trochleoplasty provides good outcomes for recurrent patellofemoral dislocations with no clear superiority across different techniques. J Clin Med. 2024;13(10)doi:10.3390/jcm13103009
43.
TestaEACamathiasCAmslerFHenlePFriederichNFHirschmannMT.Surgical treatment of patellofemoral instability using trochleoplasty or MPFL reconstruction: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(8):2309-2320. doi:10.1007/s00167-015-3698-1
44.
van SambeeckJDPvan de GroesSAWVerdonschotNHanninkG.Trochleoplasty procedures show complication rates similar to other patellar-stabilizing procedures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(9):2841-2857. doi:10.1007/s00167-017-4766-5
45.
YavchitzARavaudPAltmanDG, et al. A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:56-65. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.020
46.
ZaffagniniSPrevitaliDTamboriniSPagliazziGFilardoGCandrianC.Recurrent patellar dislocations: trochleoplasty improves the results of medial patellofemoral ligament surgery only in severe trochlear dysplasia. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(11):3599-3613. doi:10.1007/s00167-019-05469-4
