Validation of a Composite Outcome Score for Assessing Return to Sports After Achilles Tendon Repair

Abstract

Background:

The Ankle-GO is a composite outcome score based on 4 functional tests and 2 patient-reported outcome measures. It was initially described and validated for its ability to predict return to sports (RTS) at the same level of play after lateral ankle sprains.

Purpose/Hypothesis:

The main aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Ankle-GO in patients after Achilles tendon repair. The second objective was to evaluate its ability to predict RTS at the same level of play. It was hypothesized that this composite outcome score is a valid and reliable tool that is able to discriminate and predict the level of RTS at 9 months after Achilles tendon repair.

Study Design:

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

This was a prospective multicenter study. Patients who were active in sports and underwent primary acute Achilles tendon repair between April 2021 and December 2022 were included. A control group comprising 30 participants with no history of lower limb injuries was also evaluated. After standard rehabilitation for the first 2 months, the Ankle-GO was administered at 6 and 9 months after repair by the same experienced physical therapist. During testing, the patients were asked whether they were able to practice their main sport again and, if so, whether at the same or a lower level of play. A comparison between control participants and patients at 9 months after surgery was performed.

Results:

A total of 50 patients (24 women and 26 men), with a mean age of 38.3 ± 10.1 years, were included. No patients were lost to follow-up at 9 months. The Ankle-GO score at 6 months was 10.7 ± 4.8. At 9 months, the score had risen by 4.8 points. All participants scored above the minimum threshold. The minimum score achieved was 3 points (n = 5 [10%]). Only 1 patient (2%) obtained the maximum score (25 points). There was a significant difference in the Ankle-GO score between patients at 6 and 9 months and between control participants and patients at 9 months after Achilles tendon repair. Of the 50 patients included in the study, 14 (28%) returned to their preinjury level of sport at 9 months. The ability of the Ankle-GO score at 6 months to predict RTS at the preinjury level at 9 months was good (area under the curve = 0.71 [95% CI, 0.56-0.85]; P < .01). A Youden index of 0.42 was observed for a cut-off score of 8 points, which corresponds to a sensitivity of 81.8% and a specificity of 41.2%.

Conclusion:

The Ankle-GO is a valid tool to evaluate and discriminate patients during the RTS continuum after Achilles tendon repair and to predict RTS at the same level at 9 months after surgery. This composite outcome score assesses ankle function and the patient’s psychological readiness to avoid premature RTS and worsening of the injury. Further studies are needed to assess its value in identifying and predicting patients at risk of a recurrence.