The Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0) is a disease-specific, quality of life patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that is valid and reliable in patients with recurrent lateral patellofemoral instability (LPI). Quality of life encompasses the physical, emotional, and psychological aspects of patient functioning and recovery.
Purposes:
To concurrently validate the BPII 2.0 to the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and the Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Return to Sport after Injury Scale (ACL-RSI) in patients presenting with recurrent LPI and to assess baseline values for the PROMs in patients with LPI.
Study Design:
Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.
Methods:
A total of 107 consecutive patients with recurrent LPI were assessed between January and October 2021. Patients completed the BPII 2.0, TSK-11, PCS, and ACL-RSI. A Pearson r correlation coefficient was employed to examine relationships between the PROMs. Baseline values, as well as floor and ceiling effects and Cronbach alpha, were assessed for all PROMs.
Results:
All 107 patients completed the 4 PROMs. Patients included 28 men (26.2%) and 79 women (73.8%), with a mean (SD) age of 25.7 (9.8) years. The mean (SD) age at first dislocation was 14.8 (6.3) years. The TSK-11, PCS, and ACL-RSI were all statistically significantly correlated with the BPII 2.0 (P < .01; 2-tailed), with moderate correlations (r = -0.361-0.628) The R2 values indicated an overlap of the constructs measured by the PROMs.
Conclusion:
A statistically significant correlation was evident between the BPII 2.0 and the other PROMs. The BPII 2.0 does not explicitly measure kinesiophobia or pain catastrophizing; however, the significant statistical relationship of the TSK-11 and PCS to the BPII 2.0 suggests that this information is being captured and reflected.
AilyJBde AlmeidaACRamirezPCda Silva AlexandreTMattielloSM.Lower education is an associated factor with the combination of pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia in patients with knee osteoarthritis?Clin Rheumatol. 2021;40(6):2361-2367.
2.
ArdernCLTaylorNFFellerJAWebsterKE.A systematic review of the psychological factors associated with returning to sport following injury. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(17):1120-1126.
3.
ArdernCLTaylorNFFellerJAWhiteheadTSWebsterKE.Psychological responses matter in returning to preinjury level of sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(7):1549-1558.
4.
ArdernCLWebsterKETaylorNFFellerJA.Return to the preinjury level of competitive sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: two-thirds of patients have not returned by 12 months after surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(3):538-543.
5.
AshoorionVSadeghiradBWangL, et al. Predictors of persistent post-surgical pain following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Pain Med. 2023;24(4):369-381.
6.
BalcarekPMilinkovicDDZimmererAZimmermannF.Mental and physical health-related quality of life in patients with recurrent patellar dislocations—a generic and disease-specific quality of life questionnaire assessment. J Exp Orthop. 2022;9(1):60.
7.
BecherCAttalRBalcarekP, et al. Successful adaption of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII) 2.0 into German. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(9):2679-2684.
8.
BrowningRBClappIMAlterTDNwachukwuBUNhoSJ.Pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia affect return to sport in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021;3(4):e1087-e1095.
9.
BurgiCRPetersSArdernCL, et al. Which criteria are used to clear patients to return to sport after primary ACL reconstruction? A scoping review. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(18):1154-1161.
10.
ChaudhuriKRMartinez-MartinPBrownRG, et al. The metric properties of a novel non-motor symptoms scale for Parkinson’s disease: results from an international pilot study. Mov Disord. 2007;22(13):1901-1911.
11.
ChristensenKBCominsJDKrogsgaardMR, et al. Psychometric validation of PROM instruments. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021;31(6):1225-1238.
12.
CominsJDBrodersenJSiersmaVJensenJHansenCFKrogsgaardMR.How to develop a condition-specific PROM. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021;31(6):1216-1224.
13.
DimitriadisZKapreliEStrimpakosNOldhamJ.Do psychological states associate with pain and disability in chronic neck pain patients?J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2015;28(4):797-802.
14.
FilardoGRoffiAMerliG, et al. Patient kinesiophobia affects both recovery time and final outcome after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(10):3322-3328.
15.
ForsdykeDSmithAJonesMGledhillA.Psychosocial factors associated with outcomes of sports injury rehabilitation in competitive athletes: a mixed studies systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(9):537-544.
16.
GiustiEMMannaCVaralloG, et al. The predictive role of executive functions and psychological factors on chronic pain after orthopaedic surgery: a longitudinal cohort study. Brain Sci. 2020; 10(10):685.
17.
GulbrandsenMTHartiganDRiceRCRuckleDEPatelKChhabraA.Do current stability scores after MPFL reconstruction correlate with patient satisfaction postoperatively?Iowa Orthop J. 2022;42(1):187-192.
18.
HelminenEEArokoskiJPSelanderTASinikallioSH.Multiple psychological factors predict pain and disability among community-dwelling knee osteoarthritis patients: a five-year prospective study. Clin Rehabil. 2020;34(3):404-415.
19.
HiemstraLAKerslakeSLafaveMMohtadiNG.Concurrent validation of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument to the Norwich Patellar Instability Score and the Kujala Score in patients with patellofemoral instability. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016;4(5):2325967116646085.
20.
HiemstraLAKerslakeSLafaveMR.Patellar apprehension is reduced in most but not all patients after successful patellar stabilization. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(4):975-981.
21.
HiemstraLAKerslakeSLafaveMR.Quality-of-life outcomes of patients following patellofemoral stabilization surgery: the influence of trochlear dysplasia. J Knee Surg. 2017;30(9):887-893.
22.
HiemstraLAKerslakeSALafaveMR.Influence of risky pathoanatomy and demographic factors on clinical outcomes after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: a regression analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(12):2904-2909.
23.
HsuC-JMeierbachtolAGeorgeSZChmielewskiTL.Fear of reinjury in athletes: implications for rehabilitation. Sports Health. 2017;9(2):162-167.
24.
HurleyETMarkusDHManninoBJ, et al. Patients unable to return to play following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstructions demonstrate poor psychological readiness. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(11):3834-3838.
25.
LafaveMRHiemstraLKerslakeS. Factor analysis and item reduction of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII): introduction of BPII 2.0. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(8):2081-2086.
26.
LafaveMRHiemstraLAParikhSNPetersonDKerslakeS.Validity and reliability of the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0 in an adolescent population. J Pediatr Orthop. 2020;40(2):e103-e108.
27.
LaméIEPetersMLKesselsAGVan KleefMPatijnJ.Test-retest stability of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia in chronic pain over a longer period of time. J Health Psychol. 2008;13(6):820-826.
28.
MaclachlanLRCollinsNJMatthewsMLGHodgesPWVicenzinoB.The psychological features of patellofemoral pain: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(9):732-742.
29.
MaclachlanLRMatthewsMHodgesPWCollinsNJVicenzinoB.The psychological features of patellofemoral pain: a cross-sectional study. Scand J Pain. 2018;18(2):261-271.
30.
ManjunathAKHurleyETJazrawiLMStraussEJ.Return to play after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(4):1094-1100.
31.
McHorneyCATarlovAR.Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?Qual Life Res. 1995;4(4):293-307.
32.
MilinkovicDDJovandicIZimmermannFBalcarekP.The J-sign and the body mass index determine the disease-specific quality of life in patients with lateral patellar instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022;30(5):1672-1678.
33.
MirBVivekananthaPDhillonS, et al. Fear of reinjury following primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31(6):2299-2314.
34.
MitaniGSeriganoKTakagakiT, et al. MPFL reconstruction combined with a modified Elmslie-Trillat procedure for recurrent patellofemoral instability. J Knee Surg. 2024;37(3):167-174.
35.
MokkinkLBTerweeCBPatrickDL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737-745.
36.
NormanGRWyrwichKWPatrickDL.The mathematical relationship among different forms of responsiveness coefficients. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(5):815-822.
37.
PlattBNBowersLCMagnusonJA, et al. Return to sport after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50(1):282-291.
38.
Ramírez-MaestreCEsteveRRuiz-PárragaGGómez-PérezLLópez-MartínezAE.The key role of pain catastrophizing in the disability of patients with acute back pain. Int J Behav Med. 2017;24(2):239-248.
39.
SchneiderDKGraweBMagnussenRA, et al. Outcomes after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for the treatment of recurrent lateral patellar dislocations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(11):2993-3005.
40.
SchoberPBoerCSchwarteLA.Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(5):1763-1768.
41.
SlaterDKvistJArdernCL.Biopsychosocial factors associated with return to preinjury sport after ACL injury treated without reconstruction: NACOX Cohort Study 12-month follow-up. Sports Health. 2023;15(2):176-184.
42.
StreinerDL.A checklist for evaluating the usefulness of rating scales. Can J Psychiatry. 1993;38(2):140-148.
43.
SullivanMJBishopSPivikJ.The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess. 1995;7:524-532.
44.
SvenssonGLLundbergMOstgaardHCWendtGK.High degree of kinesiophobia after lumbar disc herniation surgery: a cross-sectional study of 84 patients. Acta Orthop. 2011;82(6):732-736.
45.
TerweeCBPrinsenCACChiarottoA, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1159-1170.
46.
ThomaLMRethornTJBestTMFlaniganDCSchmittLC.High kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing in people with articular cartilage defects in the knee and associations with knee function. Knee. 2021;28:17-24.
47.
ThompsonKKramarchukMYagnatovskyM, et al. Pain catastrophizing is associated with increased physical disability in patients with anterior knee pain. J Orthop. 2020;21:283-286.
48.
TkachukGAHarrisCA.Psychometric properties of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11). J Pain. 2012;13(10):970-977.
49.
TruongLKMosewichADHoltCJLeCYMiciakMWhittakerJL.Psychological, social and contextual factors across recovery stages following a sport-related knee injury: a scoping review. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(19):1149-1156.
50.
VascellariARamponiCVenturinDBenGColettiN.The relationship between kinesiophobia and return to sport after shoulder surgery for recurrent anterior instability. Joints. 2019;7(4):148-154.
51.
Von HeidekenJIversenMDHellstenAAskenbergerM.Adaptation of the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument (BPII) 2.0 into Swedish. Acta Orthop. 2023;94:537-542.
52.
WebsterKEFellerJA.Development and validation of a short version of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) scale. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6(4):2325967118763763.
53.
WobySRRoachNKUrmstonMWatsonPJ.Psychometric properties of the TSK-11: a shortened version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. Pain. 2005;117(1-2):137-144.
