CopayAGChungASEybergBOlmscheidNChutkanNSpangehlMJ. Minimum clinically important difference: current trends in the orthopaedic literature, part I: upper extremity: a systematic review. JBJS Rev. 2018;6(9):e1.
2.
JaeschkeRSingerJGuyattGH. Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10(4):407-415.
3.
MenendezMESudahSYCohnMR, et al. Defining minimal clinically important difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State after the Latarjet procedure. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50(10):2761-2766.
4.
PasqualiniIPiuzziNS. Patient-reported outcome measures: state of the art in patient-reported outcome measure application in lower extremity orthopaedics. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023;31(20):e883-e889.
5.
PasqualiniITanoiraIHurleyETRanallettaMAndrés RossiL. Effect of patient characteristics on the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state thresholds after arthroscopic Bankart repair. Am J Sports Med. 2024;52(1):174-180.
6.
ScanaliatoJPGreenCKSandlerABHurleyETHettrichCMParnesN. Establishing the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state after arthroscopic posterior labral repair for posterior glenohumeral instability. Am J Sports Med. 2024;52(1):207-214.
7.
SuFAllahabadiSBongbongDNFeeleyBTLansdownDA. Minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptom state of outcome measures relating to shoulder pathology and surgery: a systematic review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021;14(1):27-46.
