Meniscal repair for a traumatic meniscal tear is increasingly used to preserve the meniscus. Interpreting postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans remains challenging, especially in symptomatic patients. There is a lack of reliable MRI criteria to affirm the healed character of a traumatic meniscal injury repair.
Purpose:
To identify relevant MRI criteria for meniscal healing after meniscal repair.
Study Design:
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods:
We prospectively included all patients with a traumatic meniscal injury who underwent either an isolated meniscal repair or a repair during a concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A standardized preoperative and postoperative clinical evaluation was performed, along with collection of functional scores—Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm Score, and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. An MRI scan was performed 1 year postoperatively and compared with the preoperative MRI scan. The following MRI aspects were analyzed: variation of morphology and fat-saturated (FS) T2 intensity signal and pre- and postoperative tear diastasis measurement.
Results:
Fifty patients (age, mean ± SD, 28.7 ± 8.5 years [range, 16-45 years]) who were 1 year postoperative were included. All patients were considered clinically healed had the same MRI characteristics. A signal change (FS T2) was observed from a high signal intensity fluid to a nonfluid moderate signal intensity. The morphology of the lesion was more complex: from the initial lesion, line ramifications appeared, creating the appearance of tree branches. The tear diastasis decreased (from 2.3 ± 0.5 mm [range, 1.3-3.5] to 1.1 ± 0.28 mm [range, 0.5-1.5]).
Conclusion:
MRI criteria confirming meniscal healing after traumatic meniscal repair at 1 year were identified: a change in the intrameniscal signal becoming nonfluid and moderate in intensity; a reduction in tear diastasis to <1.5 mm; and a change in the signal morphology of the repaired meniscus.
ArnoczkySPCooperTGStadelmaierDMHannafinJA. Magnetic resonance signals in healing menisci: an experimental study in dogs. Arthroscopy. 1994;10(5):552-557.
3.
BarrettGRRichardsonKRuffCGJonesA. The effect of suture type on meniscus repair. A clinical analysis. Am J Knee Surg. 1997;10(1):2-9.
4.
BeaufilsPPujolN. Management of traumatic meniscal tear and degenerative meniscal lesions. Save the meniscus. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(suppl 8):S237-S244.
BengtssonJMöllborgJWernerS. A study for testing the sensitivity and reliability of the Lysholm knee scoring scale. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1996;4(1):27-31.
7.
BloughCLBobbaCMDiBartolaAC, et al. Biologic augmentation during meniscal repair. J Knee Surg. 2023;36(5):498-506.
8.
BronsteinRKirkPHurleyJ. The usefulness of MRI in evaluating menisci after meniscus repair. Orthopedics. 1992;15(2):149-152.
9.
ChoiNHKimBYHwang BoBHVictoroffBN. Suture versus FasT-Fix all-inside meniscus repair at time of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(10):1280-1286.
10.
CılızDCılızAElvericiESakmanBYükselEAkbulutO. Evaluation of postoperative menisci with MR arthrography and routine conventional MRI. Clin Imaging. 2008;32(3):212-219.
11.
CollinsNJMisraDFelsonDTCrossleyKMRoosEM. Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score physical function short form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(suppl 11):S208-S228.
12.
CrawfordRWalleyGBridgmanSMaffulliN. Magnetic resonance imaging versus arthroscopy in the diagnosis of knee pathology, concentrating on meniscal lesions and ACL tears: a systematic review. Br Med Bull. 2007;84:5-23.
13.
CruesJVMinkJLevyTLLotyschMStollerDW. Meniscal tears of the knee: accuracy of MR imaging. Radiology. 1987;164(2):445-448.
14.
De SmetAA. MR imaging and MR arthrography for diagnosis of recurrent tears in the postoperative meniscus. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2005;9(2):116-124.
15.
De SmetAANathanDHGrafBKHaalandBAFineJP. Clinical and MRI findings associated with false-positive knee MR diagnoses of medial meniscal tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(1):93-99.
16.
DeutschALMinkJHFoxJM, et al. Peripheral meniscal tears: MR findings after conservative treatment or arthroscopic repair. Radiology. 1990;176(2):485-488.
17.
FarleyTEHowellSMLoveKFWolfeRDNeumannCH. Meniscal tears: MR and arthrographic findings after arthroscopic repair. Radiology. 1991;180(2):517-522.
18.
FeeleyBTLauBC. Biomechanics and clinical outcomes of partial meniscectomy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018;26(24):853-863.
19.
GopezAKavanaghE. MR imaging of the postoperative meniscus: repair, resection, and replacement. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2006;10(3):229-240.
20.
HamadaMTsujiiA. Editorial commentary: all-inside double-vertical cross-suture is an effective technique for knee meniscus radial tear repair, but there is no gold-standard evaluation tool for evaluating healing and function of the repaired meniscus. Arthroscopy. 2022;38(6):1930-1932.
21.
HantesMEZachosVCZibisAH, et al. Evaluation of meniscal repair with serial magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study between conventional MRI and indirect MR arthrography. Eur J Radiol. 2004;50(3):231-237.
22.
HawkerGAMianSKendzerskaTFrenchM. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(suppl 11):S240-S252.
23.
HoffelnerTReschHForstnerRMichaelMMinnichBTauberM. Arthroscopic all-inside meniscal repair—does the meniscus heal? A clinical and radiological follow-up examination to verify meniscal healing using a 3-T MRI. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40(2):181-187.
24.
KijowskiRRosasHWilliamsALiuF. MRI characteristics of torn and untorn post-operative menisci. Skeletal Radiol. 2017;46(10):1353-1360.
25.
KoukouliasNPapastergiouSKazakosKPouliosGParisisK. Clinical results of meniscus repair with the meniscus arrow: a 4- to 8-year follow-up study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15(2):133-137.
26.
LauBCConwayDMulvihillJZhangALFeeleyBT. Biomechanical consequences of meniscal tear, partial meniscectomy, and meniscal repair in the knee. JBJS Rev. 2018;6(4):e3.
27.
LimPSSchweitzerMEBhatiaM, et al. Repeat tear of postoperative meniscus: potential MR imaging signs. Radiology. 1999;210(1):183-188.
28.
LubowitzJHPoehlingGG. Save the meniscus. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(3):301-302.
29.
MageeT. Accuracy of 3-Tesla MR and MR arthrography in diagnosis of meniscal retear in the post-operative knee. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;43(8):1057-1064.
30.
MageeT. Three-tesla MR imaging of the knee. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007;45(6):1055-1062, vii.
31.
MarianiPPSantoriNAdrianiEMastantuonoM. Accelerated rehabilitation after arthroscopic meniscal repair: a clinical and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. Arthroscopy. 1996;12(6):680-686.
32.
McCauleyTR. MR imaging evaluation of the postoperative knee. Radiology. 2005;234(1):53-61.
33.
MiaoYYuJKAoYFZhengZZGongXLeungKKM. Diagnostic values of 3 methods for evaluating meniscal healing status after meniscal repair: comparison among second-look arthroscopy, clinical assessment, and magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(4):735-742.
34.
MiaoYYuJ-kZhengZ-z, et al. MRI signal changes in completely healed meniscus confirmed by second-look arthroscopy after meniscal repair with bioabsorbable arrows. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17(6):622-630.
35.
MuellnerTEgkherANikolicAFunovicsMMetzV. Open meniscal repair: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings after twelve years. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27(1):16-20.
36.
MustonenAOTTielinenLLindahlJHirvensalo E, KiuruMKoskinenSK. MRI of menisci repaired with bioabsorbable arrows. Skeletal Radiol. 2006;35(7):515-521.
37.
OgawaHMatsumotoKSengokuMYoshiokaHAkiyamaH. Arthroscopic repair of horizontal cleavage meniscus tears provides good clinical outcomes in spite of poor meniscus healing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(11):3474-3480.
38.
PujolNPanarellaLSelmiTASNeyretPFithianDBeaufilsP. Meniscal healing after meniscal repair: a CT arthrography assessment. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(8):1489-1495.
39.
SelesnickFHNobleHBBachmanDCSteinbergFL. Internal derangement of the knee: diagnosis by arthrography, arthroscopy, and arthrotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;198:26-30.
40.
SongBTanWXuY, et al. 3D-MRI combined with signal-to-noise ratio measurement can improve the diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity in evaluating meniscal healing status after meniscal repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(1):177-188.
41.
Sonnery-CottetBFreychetBMurphyCGPupimBHBThaunatM. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and preservation: the single-anteromedial bundle biological augmentation (SAMBBA) technique. Arthrosc Tech. 2014;3(6):e689-e693.
42.
TapasviSShekharAChandorkarAPatilAPatilS. Indirect magnetic resonance arthrography may help avoid second look arthroscopy for assessment of healing after bucket handle medial meniscus repairs: a prospective clinico-radiological observational study. Indian J Orthop. 2021;55(2):416-424.
43.
ThorlundJBHolsgaard-LarsenACreabyMW, et al. Changes in knee joint load indices from before to 12 months after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: a prospective cohort study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016;24(7):1153-1159.
44.
TrattnigSRandTCzernyC, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the postoperative knee. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10(4):221-236.
45.
VerdonkRMadryHShabshinN, et al. The role of meniscal tissue in joint protection in early osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(6):1763-1774.
46.
VivesMJHomesleyDCiccottiMGSchweitzerME. Evaluation of recurring meniscal tears with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a randomized, prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31(6):868-873.
47.
WillingerLHerbstEDiermeierT, et al. High short-term return to sports rate despite an ongoing healing process after acute meniscus repair in young athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(1):215-222.
48.
YamasakiSHashimotoYNishidaY, et al. Assessment of meniscal healing status by magnetic resonance imaging T2 mapping after meniscal repair. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(4):853-860.
49.
ZhuSLiXLuZ, et al. Arthroscopic repair of degenerative medial meniscus tears in patients aged over 45 years resulted in favorable clinical oucomes and low clinical failure rates at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31(5):1815-1823.
50.
ZimmererASobauCNietschkeRSchneiderMEllermannA. Long-term outcome after all inside meniscal repair using the FasT-Fix system. J Orthop. 2018;15(2):602-605.
