BloomDAKaplanDJMojicaE, et al. The minimal clinically important difference: a review of clinical significance. Am J Sports Med. 2023;51(2):520-524.
2.
BoyerCWLeeIETenanMS. All MCIDs are wrong, but some may be useful. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022;52(6):401-407.
3.
ElkinsMRPintoRZVerhagenA, et al. Statistical inference through estimation: recommendations from the International Society of Physiotherapy Journal Editors. Phys Ther. 2022;102(6):pzac066.
4.
ElkinsMRPintoRZVerhagenA, et al. Statistical inference through estimation: recommendations from the International Society of Physiotherapy Journal Editors. J Physiother. 2022;68(1):1-4.
5.
FranceschiniMBoffaAPignottiEAndrioloLZaffagniniSFilardoG. The minimal clinically important difference changes greatly based on the different calculation methods. Am J Sports Med. 2023;51(4):1067-1073.
6.
LakensD. Correspondence: Reward, but do not yet require, interval hypothesis tests. J Physiother. 2022;68(3):213-214.
7.
LohseK. In defense of hypothesis testing: a response to the joint editorial from the international Society of Physiotherapy Journal Editors on statistical inference through estimation. Phys Ther. 2022;102(11):pzac118.
8.
LohseK. No Estimation without inference: a response to the International Society of Physiotherapy Journal Editors. Commun Kinesiol. 2022;1(4).
9.
Public Workshop on Patient-Focused Drug Development. Guidance 4: Incorporating Clinical Outcome Assessments Into Endpoints for Regulatory Decision Making. FDA; December6, 2019. Accessed July 11, 2023. https://www.fda.gov/media/132505/download
10.
TenanMCaldwellA. Confidence intervals and smallest worthwhile change are not a panacea: a response to the International Society of Physiotherapy Journal Editors. Commun Kinesiol. 2022;1(4).
11.
TenanMSSimonJERobinsRJLeeISheeanADickensJF. Anchored minimal clinically important difference metrics are biased by regression-to-the-mean. J Athl Train. 2021;56(9):1042-1049.
