Predicting the Objective and Subjective Clinical Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Machine Learning Analysis of 432 Patients: Response
Restricted accessReplyFirst published online April, 2023
Predicting the Objective and Subjective Clinical Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Machine Learning Analysis of 432 Patients: Response
BenichouJGailMH.Methods of inference for estimates of absolute risk derived from population-based case-control studies. Biometrics. 1995;51(1):182-194.
2.
BloomDAKaplanDJMojicaE, et al. The minimal clinically important difference: a review of clinical significance. Am J Sports Med. 2023;51(2):520-524.
3.
BullockGSHughesTArundaleAH, et al. Black box prediction methods in sports medicine deserve a red card for reckless practice: a change of tactics is needed to advance athlete care. Sports Med. 2022;52(8):1729-1735.
4.
BullockGSMylottJHughesT, et al. Just how confident can we be in predicting sports injuries? A systematic review of the methodological conduct and performance of existing musculoskeletal injury prediction models in sport. Sports Med. 2022;52(10):2469-2482.
CollinsGSReitsmaJBAltmanDGMoonsKG.Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ. 2015;350:g7594.
7.
DhimanPMaJAndaur NavarroCL, et al. Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022;22(1):101.
8.
DupontWDPlummerWDJr.Understanding the relationship between relative and absolute risk. Cancer. 1996;77(11):2193-2199.
KarhadeAVBernsteinDNDesaiV, et al. What is the clinical benefit of common orthopaedic procedures as assessed by the PROMIS versus other validated outcomes tools?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022;480(9):1672-1681.
11.
KunzeKNPolceEMClappI, et al. Machine learning algorithms predict functional improvement after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome in athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021;103(12):1055-1062.
12.
KunzeKNPolceEMRanawatAS, et al. Application of machine learning algorithms to predict clinically meaningful improvement after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9(10):23259671211046575.
13.
MartinRKWastvedtSPareekA, et al. Predicting anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction revision: a machine learning analysis utilizing the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022;104(2):145-153.
MoonsKGAltmanDGReitsmaJB, et al. Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(1):W1-W73.
16.
NwachukwuBUChangBVoletiPB, et al. Preoperative Short Form Health Survey score is predictive of return to play and minimal clinically important difference at a minimum 2-year follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(12):2784-2790.
17.
NwachukwuBUSullivanSWRauckRC, et al. Patient-reported outcomes and factors associated with achieving the minimal clinically important difference after ACL reconstruction: results at a mean 7.7-year follow-up. JBJS Open Access. 2021;6(4):e21.00056.
18.
RamkumarPNKarnutaJMHaeberleHS, et al. Association between preoperative mental health and clinically meaningful outcomes after osteochondral allograft for cartilage defects of the knee: a machine learning analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(4):948-957.
19.
RamkumarPNKarnutaJMHaeberleHS, et al. Effect of preoperative imaging and patient factors on clinically meaningful outcomes and quality of life after osteochondral allograft transplantation: a machine learning analysis of cartilage defects of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(8):2177-2186.
20.
RamkumarPNKarnutaJMHaeberleHS, et al. Radiographic indices are not predictive of clinical outcomes among 1735 patients indicated for hip arthroscopic surgery: a machine learning analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(12):2910-2918.
21.
RileyRDDebrayTPACollinsGS, et al. Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a binary outcome. Stat Med. 2021;40(19):4230-4251.
22.
RileyRDEnsorJSnellKIE, et al. Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model. BMJ. 2020;368:m441.
23.
Van CalsterBMcLernonDJvan SmedenMWynantsLSteyerbergEW.Calibration: the Achilles heel of predictive analytics. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):230.
24.
van den GoorberghRvan SmedenMTimmermanDVan CalsterB. The harm of class imbalance corrections for risk prediction models: illustration and simulation using logistic regression. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022;29(9):1525-1534.
25.
VandenbrouckeJPvon ElmEAltmanDG, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):e297.
26.
YeZWuCXuJ, et al. Meniscal resection increases the risk of residual knee laxity even in patients undergoing anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with eight strands of hamstring autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. Published online November 15, 2022. doi:10.1007/s00167-022-07231-9
27.
YeZXuJChenJ, et al. Effect of anterolateral structure augmentation on graft maturity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a clinical and MRI follow-up of 2 years. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50(7):1805-1814.
28.
YeZZhangTWuC, et al. Predicting the objective and subjective clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a machine learning analysis of 432 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50(14):3786-3795.